The Conflicts In The Persian Wars

Superior Essays
Introduction
The Persian Wars were a series of conflicts involving the Persian Empire and many Greek city-states spanning from c.499-449 BCE. The conflict began around 499 BCE when Greek city-states in Anatolia, client states of the Persian Empire, rose in open rebellion against the Empire. Following the Persian Empire defeating the rebellion in 493 BCE, numerous conflicts would be fought between Persia and the Greek city-states until 449 BCE. The Greeks ―utilizing superior training, tactics, and Persian mistakes― were ultimately able to defeat the much larger Persian Empire. Greek superiority in the Persian Wars is best illustrated by three stages of the Wars: the first invasion of the Greek mainland, the second invasion of the Greek mainland, and the Greek counterattack into the Persian Empire (Delian Wars). Ultimately ending with the Peace of Callias in 449 BCE, the Greek states ended the Persian domination of the region.
First Invasion of Greek Mainland
Following the end of the Ionian Revolt, the Persian Empire sought to invade mainland Greece. Pagden writes that “Darius now began to gather a vast army from all the peoples who owed him allegiance.” Speaking to the prowess of the Persian Army, Peter Green writes “That Juggernaut, the Persian war-machine -- nothing so formidable had appeared since the collapse of the Assyrian empire.” The Persian Army, under General Mardonius, first moved in 492 BCE conquering Thrace and Macedon without much resistance but was delayed when Mardonius’ fleet was
…show more content…
Greek strategy overcame the sheer size of the Persian Army; utilizing the terrain around them and their men, the Greeks experienced great success in places like Marathon, the Straits of Salamis, and Mycale. However, the Persian’s over reliance on the size of their forces and some crucial battlefield mistakes, like the order to assault at Plataea, greatly aided the Greeks in their

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    At one point in time, the king of the Persians and The Medes looked out amongst a great army of some two million men. The sheer size of such a military was enough to send anyone who valued their life running. The great king of kings was going to accomplish what had not been done before, not by his father or anyone of the like. He was going to conquer Greece. Such confidence could only later be replaced with horror, as the once great king looked upon his defeat from the height of a mountain, a symbolic end to a powerful campaign.…

    • 1705 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He strengthened his flank and lured the Persians in, and then surrounded them and attacked their flanks. King Darius had 26,000 soldiers and the Greek’s had 9,000 soldiers, and they still were successful. After King Darius I his son Xerxes returned and defeated the Spartans at Thermopylae (480 B.C.). During 480 B.C. the Greeks won an important naval battle, and the following year the Spartans defeated the Persians at Plataea which ended the…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Persian Wars Dbq

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Persian wars occurred during 499–479. There are many factors including Greek colonization of Asia minor, the rise of the Persian empire, and the Ionian rebellion that all played a part in the conflicts started these wars. The end results however are the most important thing because they laid the groundwork for the golden age. During the 11th century the Greeks had flourishing colonies established in Asia minor.…

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    A tactic used by the Greeks is described by Green, “bronze rams or their bows at water level designed to pierce the enemy amidships and then back off, leaving him to sink”. The events that will set the war in motion begin with Antiochus looking at the realm of Philip of Macedon and Greecewith greed (Green). Philip had shown weakness before and under the guise of liberation Antiochus wished to occupy his territories (“Antiochus”). He is given an excuse for invasion when the Aetolian league invites him to help in the liberation of Greece (Taylor 110). Antiochus, with a minimal transport fleet, comes to Greece with 10,000 infantry and 500 cavalry (Taylor 115).…

    • 1550 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is puzzling as most modern historians acknowledge that a Persian cavalry force had already disembarked from the fleet onto land and Herodotus said the Persians chose Marathon because it was “the best ground for cavalry to manoeuvre in.”. It has also been assumed that Miltiades deployed the Greek phalanx with strong wings and a weak centre, a strategy that secured victory. As a former tyrant of Ionia he would have experience in Persian tactics, also possibly the reason why Callimachus headed his advice. However Herodotus also does not make any mention of…

    • 1118 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He blames the war on the Persian Empire and their imperialistic nature and hunger for power. Despite warnings from the Spartans, Persia invaded Greece around 492 B.C. This invasion of Greek settlements on Asia Minor triggered the first round of wars. Another cause of tension between the Persians and Greeks was a movement called the Ionian Revolution. Ionians were Greek settlers who lived in southwestern Asia Minor.…

    • 1208 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    They had fought for days and lost thousands of men but had not made any progress in their invasion. The Persian king brought out a prisoner (or it was a traitor who came on his own free will, the story is disputed) who was tortured and asked for information regarding the battle. The prisoner (or traitor) told the Persians about a small trail above Thermopylae that only the local farmers knew about. It would allow the Persians to sneak up on the Greeks from behind and corner them in the pass of Thermopylae. Sometime during the night, the Kings Guard (the Persian kings elite soldiers) followed the secret pass and ambushed the Greeks.…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Very old Greek warriors became the premier warriors of their classical world. Through intense internal war fighting, they perfected heavy infantry strategies, and when they were united, they were able to defeat a (sudden, unwanted entry into a place) by Persia, the super-power of their day. The heavily outnumbered Greek warriors, called hoplites, used superior strategies, training and arms to defeat two huge (sudden, unwanted entries into places). However, the Greeks returned to their constant war fighting once their common enemy was defeated. Philip of Hellenized Macedonia, king of what the Greeks thought about/believed a (dangerous, wild person) kingdom to their north, learned and even improved the Greek's group of (possibly armed) people…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The desire for Persian kings such as Darius and Xerxes on their expeditions into Europe could stem from a great number of factors. The desire for more luxurious goods may have played a large role in the campaigns as Xerxes is described as refusing Athenian dates until he can take them himself without paying. Another motivation could be derived from the military tradition of the Persians, as each ruler was expected to campaign and be skilled fighters, somewhat forcing the hands of the Persian kings to continuously campaign and expand their boundaries. This paper however will focus on what seems to be the most prominent factor playing into the Persians desire to campaign into Europe, the rebellious uprisings along western Anatolia. These uprisings brought attention to the Persian kings that the poisonous relationship that the Greeks played in their influence over those in Anatolia, thus causing the Persians to attempt cut out the problem at the source by directly attacking the source of the uprisings, which in turn were a catalyst for the Greco-Persian wars.…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stories and Histories Essay - Kyle Floyd The Spartans, led by Leonidas took a stand at Thermopylae. Leonidas led the Spartans against the Persians, who were led by King Xerxes. They were exceedingly valiant in battle. Although they were outnumbered, but they still fought for everything they believed in, their pride for Polis, their hate towards the Persians, the phalanx, and their thoughts towards death. Leonidas and the “300” confronted the Persians at Thermopylae even though it was impossible to stop their invasion of Greece, because of their pride for their Polis.…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In early fifth century B.C.E, the Greeks constantly suffered from the threat of being conquered by the Persian Empire. Although Persian power vastly exceeded, the Greeks unexpectedly triumphed. Similar to the tale of David versus Goliath, the Greeks defeated the Persians due to divine support and Greek unity. The threat of the Persian Empire expansion into Greece and the imminent possibility that they would lose their freedom and become slaves to the Persians, so horrified the Greeks that they united together and risked their lives in order to preserve the one thing they all shared in common, their "Greekness".…

    • 1445 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    However, being disgusted of watching his fleet beaten by the smaller Greek fleet and greatly reduced being “fit for nothing but the long voyage home,” Xerxes retreated back to Persia leaving his cousin, General Mardonius in charge of the Persian army, to fight their way home as best as they could (Green, 197-8). The Greeks had now broken the Persian fleet but still had to fight Xerxes “unconquered field-army” that awaited them opposite of the Salamis strait (198). War still raged…

    • 1959 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Battle Of Salamis Summary

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This was especially disheartening for the Persian army. Xerxes ordered the attack first. Also, this battle was very costly for Persia. They needed even more ships for supplies and to also transport troops. On the other hand, the Greeks were proud, not only did they trick the Persian army, which was proven a game-changing tactic, they were also triumphant over an army more than three times their size.…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Persian War Essay

    • 1039 Words
    • 4 Pages

    I believe the Persian wars led Greece to new discoveries and advancements that influenced many countries. Hollister and De Blois and Van Der Spek wrote on the time between the Persian and Peloponnesian war, and I am convinced by Hollister because his main point did not fail my assumed interoperation in the outcome of the…

    • 1039 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As I observed the routes through which the Persians tried to invade Greece the disadvantages that i can see are grief. Especially for the Persian of 480, the persian had to travel a far distance just to invade grace it is a ridiculous amount of time. By then there forces would tired leaving themselves wide open for any possible invasion if there would come forth and once the invasion would commence their forces would most likely be lessoned and weakened in strength and numbers due to the long travel route.. As for the persian invasion of 490 there weakness came from the ships that they deployed due to the surrounds lands known as cyclades (which are all greek islands) around the sea route the persians took it made them easy to spot and invade…

    • 155 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays