Australian Court Hierarchy Essay

Improved Essays
Having a court hierarchy in Australia’s legal system contributes to a great extent in achieving justice. The existence of a court hierarchy provides a structured format, dividing different types of courts with different jurisdictions to deal with their specialised category of cases. Without the existence of the court hierarchy, the Australian legal system would struggle immensely to operate as effectively and efficiently as they presently do to achieve justice in the Australian legal system. Justice is explored through two principles, fairness and equity, which both represent impartiality in the law which is essential for due process.

To begin, the effectiveness of the court hierarchy in Australia is judged by what degree it achieves justice in regards to fairness and equity. This is exemplified through the concept of judicial precedent. There needs to be an organized system to which the doctrine of precedent can apply. If there was no court hierarchy, all courts regardless of their status, were able to set precedent, the doctrine of precedent would become nonsense as previous minor offenses would have power over the decisions of major criminal cases. With the existence of a court hierarchy in the Australian legal system, all courts are strictly bound to follow decisions made by the courts above them in the hierarchy. Precedent provides fairness in the Australian legal system as it ensures consistency and fairness amongst
…show more content…
In theory, it sounds good to enforce consistency in the law however in practice, especially when the individual doesn’t have access to a lawyer, and this would be extremely difficult and time consuming to research and find the law themselves. Consequently, the law is too challenging and inaccessible for individuals to understand. This affects the degree of fairness that precedent applies to achieving justice in the Australian legal

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Hutchinson and Monahan see the thick rule of law as being committed to a certain vision of social justice that has respect for individual rights and fights to protect them. It serves to actively limit democratic rule by having an active judiciary that is able to strike down invalid laws in defense of political morality. The main distinction between the two visions of the rule of law is the way in which justice is utilized. With thin rule of law, procedural justice operates with common law and deals with and lays down the ways and means by which substantive law can be enforced. The thick rule of law is based on substantive law which is in turn represented by the implementation of statutory law by governmental powers in an effort to establish rights and obligations of individuals.…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Therefore, although the case of R v Brown highlighted that the mere statement of Premier Newman was insufficient to cause the public to undermine the judiciary, the functions of Chapter III courts should not be given, so as to diminish the public confidence in the court’s impartial exercise of judicial power. The legislation that was limiting the discretion of the courts in R v Brown, which further caused debate, are creating a potential for public confidence of the courts to be weakened in their impartial exercise of judicial…

    • 1010 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States adopted the English Common Law and court structure in the early day there were quarter sessions courts and surrogate courts. America was a frontier country, and each colony adapted differently. This all changed during the Constitutional Convention the decision was the separate the federal court and the state court known as the dual court system. Even in today’s society, we are under that same dual court system. A parallel system of criminal justice was formed with this.…

    • 660 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Discuss the dual court system in the United States, and the structure of the federal court system, and your home state court system. The structure of the American court system has been viewed as complex and confusing as federal and state courts differ in jurisdiction, and types of cases that can be handled at the many different levels. The Supreme Court is the ultimate decision maker in cases that has been appealed regarding decisions made at the lower level of federal and state Supreme Courts. The dual court system operates within the boundaries of the state and federal court systems.…

    • 384 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Evidence Act 1977 Essay

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The above statement makes commonwealth laws biding on judges, courts and everybody. Section 109 of the Australian Constitution is concern with inconsistency of laws, and it stated…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States Constitution fixed this problem by placing a Supreme Court at the highest court in the nation, and lower courts created by Congress. Article III, Section 1 of the United States Constitution states, “The judicial Power of the United States, shall be bested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish…” (United States Constitution,…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Australian Legal System

    • 1683 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In order to support this idea, the history of the Australian legal system should be discussed. Australia is a common law country and the history of the Australian legal system stems from English common law system.2 Common law is judge made laws that are created based around areas that are not included. The judges are required to interpret legislation if there is a dispute about the meaning or how to apply an Act in a case. These interpretations then become part of the common law.3…

    • 1683 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Australian government as do other British colonies, partake in the adversary system which establishes protocol of civil or criminal cases, however, there are other judicial systems the commonwealth governments could establish. This discussion will compare and evaluate the differences of the adversary and the inquisitorial system while associating the weaknesses and strengths of the judges and the jury for the systems. The adversary system is used commonly by the colonies of Britain *yet many countries such as France and Germany practice inquisitorial*. As seen in Hollywood, the adversary system always has one judge and twelve juries with two parties competing to defeat another.…

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Statute Law In Australia

    • 705 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Australian Legislation is established and administered at three levels, the Commonwealth, the State and the local Government level. Government Institutions or (Parliaments) make laws and all of these institutions, people and laws are all part of the legal system. Common Law or Case Law is referred to as Judge made law, cases are heard, a verdict is reached and then precedence is set. Statute Law is law made by Parliament, written as Acts, Regulations or Rules.…

    • 705 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This essay will discuss why the Australian Constitution has separated the legislative, executive and judicial powers. The separation of powers is about preserving our freedom as enshrined in the Australian Constitution. The history of the separation of powers theory will be discussed, also there will be references to weekly reading materials and weekly tasks. Argued will be that the reasoning behind the separation of power is to ensure that no branch of government or an individual has sole power of the government and the country with the checks and balances system being vital to ensure the former statement. Governmental Powers Described In order to understand why we separate the legislative, executive and judicial powers in the Australian…

    • 1817 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Judicial Branch Essay

    • 1364 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Thesis Question: Of the 3 branches Legislative, Executive and Judicial which one is the most powerful? The U.S Constitution is in control of many things. It is made up for the Americans by our founding fathers George Washington, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, James Monroe And Benjamin Franklin.…

    • 1364 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A lot of children and teenagers believe the laws are just put in the world to spoil fun; however laws allows the society to live in a safe world. “Law is the system by which a society is regulated” (Queensland Parliamentary Council, 2018). It consists of rules with regard to behaviour, both at the time of action. Rights also play an important role in achieving sustainable development; as they contribute to social and political stability. As Australian Citizens, we have found unity in our diversity and differences.…

    • 732 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Judicial Branch Essay

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Hamilton does not believe the Judicial branch has as much power as the other branches but he is wrong. The Judicial branch is the Supreme Court and all the other courts beneath it. In the government there are three branches, the Executive, Legislative and the Judicial branch. All three of these branches all have certain jobs and powers that the others do not. A lot of people believe that the executive branch is the branch with the most power but I do not think so.…

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The court system has a big role in the political process because they evaluate the issues that are brought to them and view them as terms of the legislation and the constitution. Furthermore, the court system is one of the largest in the nation with an estimate of at least two thousand judicial officers and employees. The court has at three levels which are superior courts, court of appeal and supreme court, they all have their own duties to uphold. Superior courts are the ones that take care of misdemeanors such as traffic offenses, felonies and civil suits. As well as this they can operate claim courts where people can bring in cases with damage claims up to a certain amount.…

    • 1326 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It is supposed to give back a voice to the people, and stop any corruption in governments. But the question to ask is whether the absolute separation of power actually exists in the Australian legal system. We can begin by looking at the billing process as a good example…

    • 1362 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays

Related Topics