His defense for psychology begins early on by confronting first against what he states is Berezow's largest argument against psychology; lack of adequate definitions and …show more content…
All of these examples help strengthen Jogalekar's argument that psychology is a "real" science. Jogalekar chose these experiments because in some way or another they each differ from "real" science standards, but as mentioned by Jogalekar, it is not likely one would find a person who would argue any of them are not "real" science. Having knowledge about one or more of these experiments would be helpful to create a more informed opinion about either writer's argument. The best opinion is a well-informed opinion. Although Jogalekar's statements rock back and forth between arguing Berezow's main point and agreeing with others, he has written a strong article about why psychology should be considered a "real" science, or at the minimum why psychology deserves recognition for being on the developmental path to a "real"