Argumentative Essay: What Is Positive Psychology?

Improved Essays
Assessing positive psychology Positive psychology refers to the branch of psychology which is concerned with one’s satisfaction of one’s life. It is different from the more scientific branches of psychology because it is not concerned with the pathological aspects of psychology or with mental illness. Rather, positive psychology focuses on how ‘positive’ mental attitudes can lead to more ‘positive’ and fulfilling lives. In short, it is more about personal growth than an actual hard science. However, some attack some forms of positive psychology as pseudo-science, especially those who are connecting positive psychology to ‘new wave’ beliefs and other similar forms of pseudo-science. Nonetheless, positive psychology as a general branch of …show more content…
How can we wake up in the morning in every day of our lives, excited for the things that will happen? Positive psychology recognizes the problem of human motivation and happiness. Just because we are eating three times a day does not mean that can become happy. A lot of people can have a lot of possessions and yet remain unfulfilled. Some people can feel a sense of inadequacy and weakness which can possibly lead to depression or even suicide. Positive psychology, for others, is a way of resolving these kinds of …show more content…
Positive psychology encourages people not to depend their happiness on how people see them. Rather, they should assess their lives through their own standards and their own standard of happiness.
Positive psychology encourages people to create sustainable and happiness-driven lives. It discourages people to become addicted to substances and habits which only provide short-term happiness. It also discourages people to become driven by unfriendly competition. People are encouraged to build a solid positive mental outlook towards life.
In short, positive psychology can help lead to a successful life by making the person more aware of his or her choices and beliefs. We are encouraged to look at our situations, strengths and limitations, from a sober and level-headed foundation of happiness. It is less about magical or pseudo-scientific laws but more about recognizing our real situations as human beings in a human

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    However, this appears to have some flaws. Positive psychology is a branch of psychology that, by definition, focus on the factors that help individuals live a better, happier and more fulfilled life (Sheldon). The definition does not imply that the problem and negative feeling of people should be dismissed at all (Peterson). Thus, it is important to differentiate between the two concepts. People do not just survive from illness, they live.…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism states that good is what brings the most happiness to people. Mill also believes that people are not satisfied with just physical pleasures, but they strive to achieve pleasure of the mind as well. There are two main types of utilitarianism including act utilitarianism and rule utilitarianism. Act utilitarianism focuses on the consequences of specific actions of a human person in a particular situation and rule utilitarianism suggests that the principle of utility can be used to generate and test rules can be employed is similar situations. The assumption is that if we follow a set of rules that give us the best consequences our actions will result in the greater good for everyone around us.…

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He demonstrated awareness of both and pointed out how different they were, and why these differences would make it difficult to combine the two into the field of positive psychology because it would end in narrow, contrasting research. While his points were a little biased, because he is a positivist, and used negative terms and arguments towards humanistic approaches like "unfortunately" or showing the little things that humanist psychologists may focus on, I agree with his overall statement that philosophical differences between the two are at superficial levels, and because of this, their limited cooperation to combine into the field of positive psychology will be met with limited success. I believe this because, based on what Waterman (2013) wrote, historically, both perspectives have always been vastly different, and to believe that they can, as a whole, come to agreement on all, or at least most, aspects of philosophy, is unreasonable and unlikely. This is considering not only that they both use different research and therapy methods, and have entirely different views on human nature, they both belittle each other's perspective's…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Our will must be good to want to cause the most pleasure and minimize suffering. Since one has a good will, they will most likely carry out the right act, whether that is an effective act is irrelevant. Voice 2: And here we come back to one of our first points, one does not have to have good will to do good. Yes, the good willed are more likely to carry out an act that maximizes happiness but it is not necessary to happen. Even if the person did not mean good, if we praise them then maybe they can be persuaded to act so that it maximizes everyone’s happiness and not just their own.…

    • 1036 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I think moral relativism is a sound theory. There is no wrong or right and people have just made it up to make their lives easier and better. It is a worthy theory because one cannot test for something that is right or wrong and people do things because it helps them or it makes them think more highly of themselves. If I said stealing was right could you prove to me that it was actually wrong? Ethics is not like science where someone can run some tests and figure out the answer.…

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some pros of their views is that the just life is always better than the unjust life. Meaning when a human acts right not on feelings but on what is truly right, they will live a much happier life compared to if they act on what is not right. According to them one is worse off from evil action, it is better if one is evil to be caught and punished because that will return you to yourself to freedom and reason. Another pro to their views is simply that once a person does reach harmony they have reached happiness, for example if one has fear about a certain thing, but then faces it head on and overcomes that fear. It brings satisfaction and true happiness.…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Theories Of Altruism

    • 1271 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Those are not altruistic people, or selfless in that sense, because the motivation stems from their success and the appearance that they are good. According to Webster, the definition of sacrifice is to give up for the sake of other considerations and the definition of self-sacrifice is the giving up of one’s own interests in order to help others or to advance a cause. Therefore, people are not self-sacrificing or…

    • 1271 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Most have an ideal perception of how they would like to view the world, but sometimes struggle to due to their desire to gain success by comparing themselves and competing against others. However, some perceive success through a less prideful manner. These people praise the success of others despite how close or impersonal the relationship. While they desire success for themselves, they don 't view the success of others as a threat because they acknowledge that someone 's strength might not be theirs. These individuals focus more on comparing their current selves to past selves, and asking if they 've improved from the person they used to be.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The most important thing about Stoicism is understanding that things that are external are out of your control and things that are internal are in your control. That concept is important because in Stoicism our happiness should not depend on the external world; it is dependent on our state of mind. The way you think affects your behavior and Stoicism is about how you live your life. It is focused on how you learn to be self disciplined about your thinking so you have the ability to overcome emotions that take away from your happiness. In order to practice Stoicism, you have to learn to let nature take its course, be happy within, not try to have control over the external world, learn how to overcome destructive emotions, and most importantly, minimize your desires in…

    • 1399 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If a person never experiences any negative emotions there would never be an appreciation for when we experience happiness. When a person is in a negative mood they “become more analytical, more critical, and more innovative” (Begley 456). Psychologists are now studying a new type of psychology, positive psychology, which is the study of mental heartiness rather than mental diseases or disorders (Wallis). Psychologists are “studying happiness as seriously as they did pathological states such as depression” because happiness is still a pathological state (Begley 455). Happiness may not be considered a pathological state to some people because it is more common and a need to be happy.The negative emotions a person feels helps develop their self as a person who is more understanding of those around them and what they go…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays