Drug Testing Welfare Recipients

Improved Essays
Drug Testing Welfare Recipients
Back in the day when a person didn’t have enough money to fulfill their needs and wants they went out and got a job. Today we have welfare, this is a well needed program in the United States for people in need. Although this is a helpful program for many, welfare has many flaws. Now, more than ever people are abusing the benefits they receive from the government. Recipients will take the taxpayers money and use it to buy drugs, and not use it to pay for what their family truly needs like food, and clothes. To stop the people who are abusing the welfare system there needs to be new rules and regulations put in place. Drug testing welfare recipients will help improve the welfare system and its recipients; it will
…show more content…
Well that is wrong because it is known that there are some people who are on welfare and that are using drugs. Dr. Pollack of the Substance Abuse Policy Research Program come out with a statement about welfare recipients and drug use. He said that 20% of people admitted that they recently used illegal drugs while accepting welfare (Concordian). In Michigan to receive government aid you had to take a random drug test. “Only 10% of people had a positive test for illicit drugs, and only 3% of the drug tests tested positive for "hard" drugs” (Grovum). This is a result from limited data though. People who already were granted government aid before they started drug testing may be getting drugs at the moment. Therefore if they continued to have drug testing when people had to reapply for aid in a few years then they would be caught. Michigan did not have that data because it stopped the program before it reached that point (Preface). People may say that 10% of positive results isn 't enough to continue the program. But that number is only small because of the limited time they drug tested, also you would still be cracking down on drug users who are abusing the welfare system (Grovum). Even a small portion of positive tests would help better the system and even maybe help the recipients who failed. People are not trying to judge you saying that you do drugs if you …show more content…
This may even cause people to be able to get a job if they got clean to pass the welfare drug test (Grovum). Opposition came up with a great point about children. People opposed to drug testing say that it may put vulnerable children at risk, if government aid was taken away from their parents. They say that if the benefits were taken away then the parents could not supply their children, food, housing, and clothing (Lewis, and Kenefick). But it should be pointed out that the only people who would lose benefits would be people who fail the drug tests. This is what someone said about their personal experience with a mother on welfare and who abused drugs ”Growing up, my mother was a recipient who abused the welfare system. I remember having no heat or electricity and being so hungry it was painful. My siblings and I would fist fight over food. She would trade her food stamp card for various things like cash, cigarettes and an occasional joint”(Ranee). So just like her situation, other parents parents will be buying drugs when they received welfare, more likely than not the parents were not supplying for their child in the first place just like
Ranee explains. If a person were to fail a welfare drug test, therefore to get money they would have to get a job and not just rely on welfare (Grovum). Therefore in the long run failing a drug test may even benefit a family with

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Mikhail Bakunin once said, “Political Freedom without economic equality is a pretense, a fraud, a lie; and the workers want no lying.” The people who apply for jobs have to take a drug test while those on welfare can violate the use of the money. Welfare is basically financial support given to people in need. Helping people that are in need can cost money because nobody knows what they are using their check on. Many individuals do not agree with the kind of action mainly because they could be the ones that do get welfare and abuse it with drugs. People have often been doing drugs and getting a welfare check, which means that instead of looking for a job they are wasting the money the government gives them.…

    • 1532 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    These negative impacts can lead to child maltreatment. Therefore, the children’s physical and emotional needs will be the last thing that their parents consider. More than likely the parent is going to support his or her habit before the children’s need. By knowing if the parents are substance abusers, the government can place the children in a safer environment until the parents are better. Director of National Affair of the Drug Policy Alliance, Bill Piper, he believes, “That drug testing recipients on welfare would be “too expensive” and risky for kids whose parents won’t return to Department of Human Service office for extending funding due to fear of a drug test” (Welfare Programs Should..1).…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Welfare Drug Testing

    • 1317 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Many states has done test runs on random drug testing welfare recipients but none has succeeded. In 1999, the state of Michigan law allowed authorities to drug test for illegal use of drugs and to randomly test 20 percent of the welfare recipients twice each year. (State 5-6) During the running trial they tested around 268 welfare recipients and roughly Twenty-one tested positive for drug use. A U.S district judge believe this was violating citizens on welfare rights to the forth amendment, which is protection of unreasonable searches and abuse. The courts ruled this unconstitutional and discontinue this law in Michigan, some others states like Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Louisiana, Maryland, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Oklahoma and Oregon tried out the some type of drug testing for welfare recipients.…

    • 1317 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is not fair for the people that really are in need and do not spend their money on drugs. If the states started drug testing welfare applicants, more money would be given to people who really are in need of money and use their money for the things they truly need. Welfare applicants should be drug tested before receiving their money; Giving irresponsible persons welfare may lead to our tax money being wasted, separation of families, and more drug addiction. Many Americans are complaining about their tax money being given to possible drug users and their money-that they work hard for-being wasted. Many Americans were unhappy with the welfare system, claiming that individuals were abusing the welfare program by not applying for jobs, having more children just to get more aid, and staying unmarried so as to qualify for greater benefits (US Welfare System 1).…

    • 1035 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For taxpayers, it gives them a lack wanting to pay taxes or even have a job, knowing that many misuse welfare to buy drugs and fuel their addictions. If people can receive money without making an effort in bettering their lives, it would also discourage people from having jobs.This will get rid of those people who take advantage and abuse the benefits they receive. The idea of drug testing for welfare makes it a highly debatable issue. Drug testing for welfare would be a good thing not just for taxpayers but also for the safety of families who deal with drug abuse. Drug testing for people to receive government assisted programs would benefit due to the fact that it would single out those recipients that abuse drugs, taxpayers ' money would go to those recipients who are really need the…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Prescription Drug Abuse Statistics “In 2005, 4.4 million teenagers (aged 12 to 17) in the US admitted to taking prescription painkillers”(Prescription Drug Abuse Statistics 0-11) and “A 2007 survey in the US found that 3.3% of 12- to 17-year-olds and 6% of 17- to 25-year-olds had abused prescription drugs in the past month”(Prescription Drug Abuse Statistics 0-11). In the book by Powell, Jillian, and John G. Samanich it said that “ one out of three 12th graders had used marijuana”(Powell 8-9). All of the statistic had young people starting drugs which will be harmful to them in later years. 6.7 percent of 12 to 17 year olds were using marijuana in 2007. In the US 94 million people have admitted that they have taken drugs at least once in their life time.…

    • 1010 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “First, the court must determine whether the search furthers a special need of the state, and second, the court must determine whether this government interest outweighs the individual 's privacy interest.” (Shaberg). Many people argue about how it is an invasion of privacy, but if there is a dangerous situation, drug testing will only benefit that person. However, what is truly unfair is that people who are employed have to take a drug test before they get a job, and welfare recipients do not. If people who are applying for a job to get money have to take a drug test, then welfare recipients should have to too. It is only fair that people receiving welfare should have the same procedures to receive money.…

    • 1791 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Alexa Erickson wrote an article titled “Drug Prevention in the 21st Century: Why we need change & the program that may help.” She stated “Children aren’t receiving drug prevention messages, and 90% of the youth suffering from a drug problem don’t receive the help they need. Federal funding for these programs is largely overlooked, despite the fact that, in 2014, 47,055 people died from drug overdoses, which was 1.5 times greater than those killed in car crashes.” When looking back on her D.A.R.E program, she didn’t seem to remember much about it. These programs are supposed to instill the theory that drugs are bad and doing them will ruin your life, but research shows that the public antidrug programs like D.A.R.E are mostly ineffective. Erickson…

    • 1604 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When children at young age use drugs, they may have huge problems with health and education. In other hands, parents should look and take care into their children for what they buy or eat from outside. In the article” Should Illegal Drugs Be Legalized? (Kathlee Parker, 2003), shows that United States spend over billions of dollars to save children from drugs addiction. Making drugs legal may save a large amount of children especially at young age to not become drugs addiction.…

    • 1483 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The supporters of the act argued that it helped those in need and that it would help drive the unemployed to find jobs. Supporters of drug testing for welfare have pointed out, “We don 't want parents on welfare using their money for drugs. Although drug abuse by anyone can endanger life and livelihoods, drug abuse by mothers and fathers may endanger their children. Who is caring for the kids when adults are under the influence” (Bodie). So in conclusion, drug testing welfare recipients has proven to be a waste of money and valuable time of the workers who have to administer these tests.…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays