Conflicting Truth Claims Theory

Amazing Essays
7

Conflicting Truth Claims Theory Name:
Institution:
Date:

There are many arguments and theories that have been advanced to argue against the God’s existence. However, these arguments and theories have been met by critics and opposing claims that seek to discredit them. One of the theories against the God’s existence is the conflicting truth claims theory. This theory is premised on the religious diversity of various religions across the world. According to this theory, there is no ultimate reality that all religious systems provide means to achieve because there is no religion that has a direct knowledge of the real. Each of these religions needs to be seen as different ways in which one can perceive the real. According to
…show more content…
It is possible to prove that truth exists but belief is almost impossible. A belief can be explained in many different ways like the different religions do in explaining the existence of God, but truth can only be explained in only one way, what the proponents of this theory expect. The concept of God’s existence is a belief proposal and not a truth. A belief proposal is not a knowledge whereas a truth is based on the knowledge. When the proponents of the theory of conflicting truths argue against the existence of God, they seem to interpret it as a knowledge and not a belief proposal, and when they fail to find the knowledge to support the existence of God, then they discredit the same existence. Therefore, their support for the theory is not based on the lacking existence of God, but lack of knowledge to support the existence of God (Hick J. H., 1983). The religious belief that God exists is a common interest for all the religions, but none has a concrete way to explain …show more content…
Therefore, the idea of what it is appropriate to say, believe, and thus accepted as truth, is peculiar to the realm of its discourse. According to the Christian beliefs, Bible and Christian traditions are treated as important sources of knowledge. Also, nothing is said in these sources of knowledge, Bible and traditions contradict or agrees with what is said in another religion. Different religious groups, adopt the use of language and concepts that belong to different contexts that are not based on rival belief proposals. In the crafting of religious knowledge, beliefs, or truths, none of the religions had the other religion at the back of their mind. Also, the differences in these religions do not only exist in the concept of God’s existence but in other concepts like the relationships of human beings and nature. For example, whatever the position of any religion regarding the relationship between mankind and nature, is purely based on the prevailing natural physical features of the origin of that religion. For example, in the Bible, it is highly likely that the Red Sea will be mentioned because it was at the center of the origin of Christianity. Also, the Buddhism will feature the natural physical

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    The Life of Pi tried to make a significant argument of why God did exists. Thomas Aquinas showed me different sides to many arguments about God. Finally, my conversation with Olivia helped confirm my opinions. I do not believe that God exists because there is no higher power that has enough control to influence the entire world. I completely disagree with everything that the book Life of Pi states because…

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    “Contingent beings require a necessary being as their ultimate cause.” (3) There are several objections to this theory. The first argument is the atheistic claim that the universe has always existed. This objection can only go against the temporal forms of the argument though. The non-temporal form of the cosmological argument does not deal with the concept of time, and is able to stand up to this objection. The second argument is that if everything in the universe needs a cause, then so must God.…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    That one needs evidence to prove that something exists and a lack of evidence against God not existing doesn’t prove that God does exist. According to this view God doesn’t exist and Dawkins proves it with logic. In sum then, the issue is whether his argument is valid or not valid. My own view is that Dawkins’ arguments that God doesn’t exist are strong, they have direct premises that back up his conclusion. Although some might object that God does exist based on their own beliefs through religion, I would reply that Dawkins provides a strong argument against God existence through his examples.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Therefore, the possibly idea of finding a missing part of history is impossible. The reality of it all is that in every hostile situation a God will exist. God existence is valid because you cannot question the faith of his name. People will not believe in God existence because they cannot see or touch him. When you have faith you will believe without being able to touch or see it.…

    • 921 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The argument that God brought about the universe is somewhat unconvincing and contradictory. Although the argument lays a clear conclusion, it potentially creates more problems than answers. Many find the argument useless, leaving people nothing, and continuing to question the initial first cause. The single most important objection given towards the cosmological argument lies within the question of who created God? Other than the clear statement that God was the initial cause for all things that exist, it appears God is exempt from causation.…

    • 1350 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    To agnostics such as Ayer or Wittgenstein, even though one may experience God, such experience is inexpressible. They do not acknowledge the possibility of revelation of God. Geisler argues that Ayer's idea is also self-contradictory because it is neither definitional nor…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Morality And Religion

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages

    There are so many religions, and therefore possible sources of knowledge. Identifying one source of knowledge becomes problematic. Finally, morality cannot depend on the commandments of God. If morality depended on the commandments of God, either morality is arbitrary or God’s command is irrelevant. After careful examination of the arguments supporting the view that religion is essential for morality, it is clear that morality can exist independently from…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    One of the hermeneutical strategies used by Nazianzus is the incomprehensibility of God. God is something that can never be fully described by human words, as the subject of God “is impossible to [express], and yet more impossible to conceive,” as no human can see the face of God and lived to tell the tale on this side of eternity. Nazianzus defines God by what God is, but does not try to “comprehend the whole of so great a subject as this,” because it is utterly impossible. Dr. Valeria A. Karras, an assistant professor of Church History at Southern Methodist University puts it perfectly by saying that “we may know God experientially at least “in part,” that is, that we may experience God to the extent humanly possible,” which gives people…

    • 1159 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Thus, they are equally baseless. Additionally, faith attitudes do not rely on empirical data from the natural world to be strengthened, so they have no business making claims of the natural world without evidence. A great number of people may personally believe in a young Earth creationist theory, but there is no definitive, objective source in the Bible to support this as the one true interpretation. Therefore, any scientific evidence against the young earth…

    • 1345 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Atheism Vs Religion

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This further opposes the inclusivity that should encompass the worship of a god as presented by religion. This ideology in a way strengthens the argument of the atheists against religion. The existence of god is seen as a subjective experience where different people have experienced god through different ways for instance through dreams, visions while some have only seen him through the angels (Honderich, 1995). This further negates the assumptions of religion. Questions have also arisen concerning the origin of god where people have found it hard to believe that god might have arisen from nothing.…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays