Kant's Pursuit Of Happiness

Great Essays
Intro:
It is safe to say that every human being in the world wants to be happy. Humans crave the feeling of happiness. Sometimes happiness clouds decision making and causes people to make choices that aren’t the best for other people around them but satisfy their needs, which is quite selfish. People can make decisions based on happiness rather than what is morally right. This can cause many issues because if everyone just does things that make them happy, the world would be filled with corruption and poverty. If everyone based his or her actions off what was morally right, the world would be less corrupted and more peaceful. Good will is the highest good because in the end the people that act only on their good will will deserve happiness.
…show more content…
If everyone tries to be the best they can possibly be they are more likely to run into opportunities that will help them succeed. Aristotle thought that a human should always strive to be do the “right thing.” This right thing might not bring you immediate happiness, it could bring you pain or you might have to sacrifice something that is important to you but as long as you do the right thing you deserve happiness. Sometimes you might not receive happiness but doing the right thing is better than doing something to just receive happiness is considered selfish. Kant believed that you have to over come your desires and Kant believed that happiness couldn’t be the highest good because it has to be a combination of happiness and moral freedom in order to be the highest good. The way that Kant believed to figure if an action is morally okay is to use the categorical imperative. The categorical imperative is central philosophical concept in which can be used to evaluate actions. Basically it states that a person should only do a certain action if they can universalize it and it can be made into a law. If they universalize it and it is contradictory to itself then maybe this act is not a good idea to do. Kant believed that actions are morally correct if these actions come from virtues that motivate these actions. Whereas Aristotle believed that you should do anything in your power to be happy. This means that as long as you are happy that is the highest good, even if you have to do something illegal it doesn’t matter because in the end you are happy and that’s all that matters. Aristotle’s point of view is quite selfish because it only talks about your own happiness. You don’t take other peoples feelings inconsideration when making decisions, you just do what is best for you. This way of thinking is very problematic

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    He says, “The greatest happiness principle, holds that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness” (Mill 52). Mill’s utilitarian ethical theory rely majorly on the self-interest rather performing an act as a duty. An ethical theory should have a reason justified for performing a specific act. The ability of an act to yield maximum happiness should not be used to determine whether the act is moral or immoral. It involves assessing what the people perceive to be moral and taking actions which will produce insignificant consequences on the people other than the individual performing the act.…

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Our will must be good to want to cause the most pleasure and minimize suffering. Since one has a good will, they will most likely carry out the right act, whether that is an effective act is irrelevant. Voice 2: And here we come back to one of our first points, one does not have to have good will to do good. Yes, the good willed are more likely to carry out an act that maximizes happiness but it is not necessary to happen. Even if the person did not mean good, if we praise them then maybe they can be persuaded to act so that it maximizes everyone’s happiness and not just their own.…

    • 1036 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By emphasizing the importance of character traits, Aristotle gives humans credit that they can be good people performing activities because of their character not just because of rules they ought to follow. The only weak point in the theory is the reliance on virtue being essential to happiness. It fails to consider that everyone is different, unlike character traits/moral virtues which can vary from person to person or culture to culture. If the ethics of virtue applied all of its components more universally, realizing that everyone is different and that some virtuous people are not happy and some non-virtuous people are, it would make a more sound…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Another negative outcome can be having envy of others when they are more successful than you are. According to Mead,“ We tend to regard the success of people close at hand , within our small groups ,as a threat (Mead,Lines 6-7).” This quote explains that we envy people who are more or as successful as we are. It all comes down to a saying that goes like this they want you to do good but never better than them. This saying says that Americans help each other's thinking that they will get repaid by being successful. People don't understand that being envious of others, will only worsen…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He also argues that a completely ethical person will not be conflicted about his ethical choice, opposite of Kant, who thinks that a person can make an ethical choice while desiring the wrong alternative. In fact, he prefers that, because it shows that the person is doing his duty, not the action just because it makes him happy. Kant might defend himself by saying that it would be too easy for a person to succumb to selfish desires if he is gaining happiness from his virtuous acts, and any action is not moral if there are any external motivators, but I will show how this defense fails near the end of the paper. Kant and Aristotle have very different opinions on what makes a person virtuous and what defines a virtuous act. My thoughts on morality line up more with Aristotle’s.…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kantian ethics, the moral philosophy established by Immanual Kant in his work Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysics of Morals, is centered around the idea of the “categorical imperative”, the principle that certain actions are strictly prohibited, despite the potential for the prohibited action to bring about more good than the alternative. Kant believed that since humans have the ability to reason, they must use their rationale to determine what these unwavering truths, or moral duties, are. For Kant, if humans act in accordance with these moral duties, and not out of preference, instinct or desire, they are in turn acting with moral worth. This ethical outline can be applied to the case of Ben and Tyler, two buddies whose friendship is…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As we have each other’s ego and pride which is also causing the disunity that if we controlled it could lead to unity. Disunity happens because people are selfish. They have their own desires, personal goals, and individual needs. Most of us thinks that choosing what's best for our own sake is the quickest way to achieving it. But in the end, this may actually hinders us from getting what we really want faster than the way we least expect it.…

    • 1007 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They wanted to know as much as possible about their future friends, even if that information is obtained in immoral ways. By being selfish, to try to learn as much as possible, and trying to benefit themselves in every way possible, people would violate privacy and often hurt others. This utter disregard for others is brought up when Lord Henry is speak with Dorian and Basil. Henry states that: “When we are happy we are always good, but when we are good we are not always happy,” (Wilde, page 57). Lord Henry means to say that a person’s happiness is most important.…

    • 1391 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mill used utilitarianism as a basis for ethics and he argued that we already do use utilitarianism as a moral standard. To Mill an action is right if it promotes happiness and it is wrong if it reverse happiness. Kant on the other hand bases his view of ethics on good will rather than the outcomes of happiness. As we read, utilitarianism focuses on outcomes of happiness, here we can concluded that it is based on ends, not on means or intentions. I do not totally agree with this however, a person could intend something bad and wrong but in the end, end up causing great happiness.…

    • 1351 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Additionally choosing one moral virtue over another shouldn 't necessarily mean that you will be more or less happy with the outcome of the virtue. If moral virtue is arbitrary in the equation, then the question of what is truly entailed in finding out how to be happy is raised. In fact there are particular virtues and traits that are are essential in society today that guarantee a happy life. Self content, conformity, patience, and self insurance are all examples of these traits, that are very important in the attainment of happiness. Without self acceptance and acceptance of reality, it would be hard to be happy in life anyways.…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays