The Different View of University tuition It is often said that students need a lot of money to graduate the university. Both the articles, “Are Colleges Worth the Price of Admission?” by Andrew Hacker and Claudia Dreifus and “A lifetime of Student Debt? Not likely” by Robin Wilson, argue that students need not go to an expensive university to avoid over borrowing. According to Hacker and Dreifus, we can get a high-quality education; nevertheless, tuition is cheap. As the authors themselves put it, for example, when the student, who attends Cooper Union free tuition college, “speak of their futures, their tone is different from students we've met elsewhere” (Hacker and Dreifus). In other words, they believe that no tuition makes it possible
…show more content…
Hacker and Dreifus puts it, “Colleges are taking on too many roles and doing none of them well. They are …dedicated to everything from esoteric research to vocational training—and have lost track of their basic mission to challenge the minds of young people” (Hacker and Dreifus). The essence of their argument is that we don’t have worth to pay tuition for University because some of universities just focus their university’s benefit, rather than student improvement. However, Wilson disagrees with Hacker’s and Dreifus’s view because most people can pay back college debt without any troubles. Wilson maintains that the problem is that some students have not enough ability to manage their money and debt. Even though most of the students can get high revenue than workers who don’t enter any universities, and return debt easily. Basically, Wilson advocates that universities are valuable because they receive tuition to get more money, the person who is struggling with debt are people who didn’t take the financial situation seriously. In discussion of a university’s worth to pay tuition, Hacker and Dreifus argues that most of recent university dosen’t have merit to pay a bunch of money. On the other hand, Wilson contends that university have worth to pay to make more money than tuition in the
Hacker and Dreifus puts it, “Colleges are taking on too many roles and doing none of them well. They are …dedicated to everything from esoteric research to vocational training—and have lost track of their basic mission to challenge the minds of young people” (Hacker and Dreifus). The essence of their argument is that we don’t have worth to pay tuition for University because some of universities just focus their university’s benefit, rather than student improvement. However, Wilson disagrees with Hacker’s and Dreifus’s view because most people can pay back college debt without any troubles. Wilson maintains that the problem is that some students have not enough ability to manage their money and debt. Even though most of the students can get high revenue than workers who don’t enter any universities, and return debt easily. Basically, Wilson advocates that universities are valuable because they receive tuition to get more money, the person who is struggling with debt are people who didn’t take the financial situation seriously. In discussion of a university’s worth to pay tuition, Hacker and Dreifus argues that most of recent university dosen’t have merit to pay a bunch of money. On the other hand, Wilson contends that university have worth to pay to make more money than tuition in the