How To Be Taught To Animals Essay

Superior Essays
Animals and humans seem to be a completely different species. Growing up, children are taught that animals are entirely unlike humans, and that they are an inferior species even though humans evolved from apes and chimpanzees. However, we are not very different. Humans need nutrients to survive; animals need food as well. Water is a necessity for animals and humans alike. Both have an intrinsic need to procreate in order to keep the species going. Nonetheless, there is one essential difference. Human beings are the only animals that can self-reflect, while non-human animals rely solely on instinct.
Animals can be taught to do almost anything a human being can do. However, they cannot assess that they are alive. A chimpanzee, the human’s closest
…show more content…
As mentioned, animals can be taught to plug numbers into a computer. However, they cannot use reason and logic to understand what they are doing. While chimpanzees may be able to add up 2+2, they do not realize that they can also use this knowledge in the real world rather than just the math problem at hand. Human beings are able to determine what is useful in different situations. They can resolve a problem by thinking about it logically. This is given to them as they know how to the self-reflect on their choices by thinking things rationally. For example, animals hunt in order to get their food instinctually. People, on the other hand, can decide a recipe they want to make, go to the grocery store to buy the necessary items, and cook it. They can even change the recipe to make it taste better, healthier, and so on through reason. In addition, animals do not have the concept of patience. They do not understand that if they wait, they might get better food. Nature tells them they must hunt, so they find the easiest kill. Whether or not it is best for them is never the question. Human beings are the only species that can think about their actions and their consequences, and in turn use logic and reason to better themselves or even figure out solutions. However, human beings also have the capacity to think past reason and …show more content…
It is not possible to teach even the smartest chimpanzee the idea of God. They would not understand that there might be a heaven and hell, a place they may go after life. Animals see the world at face value; they cannot think about what could be, what may be, and if “x” happened, “y” would ensue. These abstract ideas are limited to humans because they can self-reflect. We have the capability to acknowledge the possibilities of the unknown. In this way, we can build our lifestyle around our beliefs and values. Abstract ideas, like the existence of a God, changes the way we think about life itself. This brings us to a concept of values. Humans use morality to self-examine their choices, while animals make their choices based on instinct. This morality stems from the idea that we can distinguish between right and wrong. We know what causes pain and suffering, what the right thing to do is, and what we cannot do because of the severe consequences to ourselves and other living beings. This idea of morality allows us to think about what we do and why we do it. It also means we assess what we do wrong and how we can improve. Humans have this necessity to improve their state of being, to advance and develop into better, more intelligent intellectuals with improved living standards. Animals, on the other hand, cannot think past what is happening at the time. When they

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Christian theme of the inviolable dignity of the individual human being is present throughout Ridley Scott’s film “The Martian.” In the film, NASA astronaut Mark Watney is on Mars with a team of other astronauts. The team gets caught in a huge storm, and Watney is swept away. His team thinks that he is dead, so they leave. Watney survived being swept away, but then he is stranded on Mars and has to survive.…

    • 337 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the article written by Jeremy Rifkin titled “A Change of Heart about Animals,” Rifkin argues that researchers have found that animals are similar to humans, which changes our perspectives of them. He elaborates how the research funded by fast food franchises reveal that pigs require mental and physical stimuli to function and how that caused European countries to change the way they treat pigs. The author extends on the similar emotional and cognitive abilities of animals and humans by demonstrating studies on the conceptual abilities of New Caledonian crows and the language abilities of Koko the gorilla. Rifkin continues to describe how animals have self-awareness and understand when they die, as evidenced by observations of orangutans…

    • 119 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Rewilding Our Hearts by Marc Bekoff (2014), he addresses how humans can change their ways to contribute to the restoration of environments damaged by human action or lack thereof. He argues that though there has been a paradigm shift in the ways in which we perceive animals has changed through beginning to see non-human animals as sentient beings (Bekoff 2014, pg. 1), there is still more change that people must become more involved with. And that is to save the ecosystems and provide protection for non-human animals and the environments they live in. Bekoff (2014) presents numerous factors in how we can contribute to a successful rewilding process such as compassion (pg. 4). Douglas’ (2015) also mentions compassion in his list of steps in how to transform society.…

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What does it mean to have a heart of change? Animals are much more similar to us than the scientific community believed for a long time, but today many in the scientific community believe that they experience, excitement and depression and the same emotions as human beings. They have a surprising level of intelligence, in that they can achieve sophisticated tool making tasks and posses qualities that the majority of people never imagined. It is so hard to realize that so many human beings are treating our fellow companion with no regards. In “ A Change of Heart about Animals” Jeremy Rifkin claims that all animals have similar qualities as human beings and that they deserve as much respect as us.…

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    David Hume's Argument

    • 245 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Hume begins his argument by asserting that animals, just like humans, learn from experience and come to infer causal connections between events. Hume describes this principle by saying: “[animals] become acquainted with the more obvious properties of eternal objects, and gradually, from their birth, treasure up a knowledge of the nature of fire, water, earth, stones, heights, depths, &c. and of the effect, which result from their operation” (Hume, 70). In order to illustrate his point, Hume cites several examples: horses learn what heights they can safely leap, and dogs learn to fear the sight of a whip (Hume, 70). Furthermore, Hume claims that non-human animals certainly do not learn to make these inferences by means of reason or argument.…

    • 245 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    We All Have Them Human beings belong to the species of Homo sapiens and are of the genus homo. Because of their mental capacity and development, speaking capability, they have been distinguished from other animals. Human beings are also the only creatures that can think on 4 levels which are emotions, beliefs, facts and ideas. We have them.…

    • 1075 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    PHI 1000 Fall 2016 Prof. Drain Essay #2 Thoughts on Thought After examining the several angles to the issue of animal cognition, it is my conclusion that non-human animals are in fact capable of thought. Although humans certainly display a superior cognitive ability, I believe the cognition of animals is not of an entirely different type, and that whatever difference remains is simply one of degree. While Davidson and Descartes tend to argue that language is a necessary component for rational creatures, Hobbes and Searle give non-human creatures more “cognitive credit,” citing their ability perceive, and to have and correct beliefs, as proof of being conscious, thinking, beings. Pointing to the immense biological similarities between humans…

    • 1802 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    No two species share the exact same behavior sets but humans do share much too in common to act that humans are not part of the animal status. The only issue that makes it this argument invalid is the way we treat animals in the meat industry. These industries have changed a lot of nutrients in the meat that is found in the grocery stores. Animals are also treated with such cruelty in those industries. These industries tend to keep the GMO animals in very crowded and unsanitary cages, again making it uncomfortable for these animals.…

    • 1148 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    We use our attachment to religion, creations stories, and emotions to set ourselves about the rest of the animal kingdom. We are bound by natural law and, to a certain extent, animalistic instinct. In several ways, we can do things better than the average beaver, but in many other ways we are more…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The view that we are human animals, "animalism", is a very unpopular view. However, those who deny it face an awkward choice. They must either deny that there are any human animals, deny that human animals can think, or deny that we are the thinking things located where we are. It is a truism that you and I are human beings and that a human being is a kind of animal: roughly a member of the primate species Homo sapiens. It would naturally seem to follow that we are animals.…

    • 1800 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Maybe the only difference between humans and animals is that how we perceive the world around us. A book that explains how animals see the world is written by Temple Grandin. The book was first published in 2005 by Mariner Books in New York and Boston. In Chapter 2: How Animals Perceive the World, Temple Grandin explains and inform us in detail on the things that scare the animals because of how they see things around them. In Temple Grandin’s book, “Animals in Translation,” she uses context, substance, organization, and logos to inform the readers on how animals and autistics see the world versus how “normal” people see the world.…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The view that we are human animals, "animalism", is a very unpopular view. Personally, I am in agreement with this view. I will explain how I understand the claim that we are animals as well as make a case for this unpopular view. Eric Olson is interested in issues involving what we essentially are. His definition of animalism is that “each of us is numerically identical with an animal.…

    • 1977 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nearly 15 years ago, I was in the first grade being asked to draw the person I imagined myself to be when I grew up. My picture portrayed me and several different types of animals at a veterinary clinic with the explanation stating, “When I grow up, I want to be a vet because I want to help animals.” I grew up an only-child and was devoted to all types of animals as if they were part of my family. For as long as I can remember I have wanted to be a vet. As a child, I would pretend to do surgery by stitching together holes in my stuffed animals.…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    My thoughts on human nature can best be summed up by the character Sirius Black in Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix: “We’ve all got both light and dark inside us. What matters is the part we choose to act on, that’s who we really are.” Our ability to critically think about our behavior and make choices is what makes us human and sets us apart from our hominid ancestors. In fact, as far as other species are concerned, there is no concept of “good” and “evil”; there is predator and prey, threatening and safe, dominant and submissive. Morality is not a factor at play in the animal kingdom.…

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In their argument, Francis and Norman reject Singer’s principle, arguing that humans may give human interests greater consideration than comparable animal interest (Francis and Norman 507). Francis and Norman agree that animal interests deserve some consideration, but they argue that it is ethically correct for humans to give human interests more weight than similar animal interests. They base their argument on the premise that all and only creatures with the ability to form plans for the non-immediate future deserve equal consideration of their interests. This essay supports the stance adopted by Francis and Norman, contending that individuals only bear moral responsibilities to some animals more then others, they are ethically right in according more weight to human interests in comparison to those of animals.…

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays