The Rights Of Humans And Other Animals Analysis

Improved Essays
Do animals have as many rights as humans? When it comes to us humans we fight for our rights. Whether it is equal rights for races, similar to “Black Lives Matter”. Or how women have fought for their right to vote. Having the right to own guns and use them for defense. Even having the right of speaking our minds when something seems wrong or isn’t right. But when it comes to animals they don’t have the voice to speak against someone/thing. That is why there have been organizations and groups to fight for their rights and to take care of them. In the article The Rights of Humans and Other Animals was a good way to depict moral judgement 's and rights between humans and animals. The little introduction paragraph was a great way to portray the topic and the issue. It talks about humans moral rights, animals have those rights too but those may be more specific to scientific studying and/ or testing. ( Tom Regan- little intro) In this it talks about how moral judgement 's need to be defended, justified, and validated. (Tom Regan- pg 104, paragraph 4, sentence 5) In which makes sense, but moral judgments more have to …show more content…
When reading the difference between these two it was interesting to know the difference. (pg 107, paragraph 20) When reading paragraph 20 it was interesting to see that welfarists are more like PETA, while maybe smaller organizations solely focus on the little stuff like the rights of them always being fed.. “Although animal welfarists can have reformist aspirations, animal rightists are necessarily abolitionists.” (pg 107, paragraph 23, sentence 2) Under Animal Rights, page 109 it talks about the difference of human rights and animal rights by asking, “ Are any nonhuman animals rational and autonomous?” Then it goes on to say if primates or mammals are. But then in paragraph 33 in the last two sentences, it does say that animals too have rights just like

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Many people aren’t willing to acknowledge that animals feel pain and suffer too. Animal welfare was set up to protect animals from any physical harm done by humans such as abuse, experiments, etc. Unlike, animals rights activist, animal welfare activist sometimes support animal testing as long as the animal is cared for, fed, and treated well. On the other hand, rights activist…

    • 1540 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Goodall also states that when coming to the realization that animals have the same right as we do to inhabit the earth, but there is a big communication barrier between us. This barrier might prevent humans to further understand what steps humans need to take in order to understand animal suffrage. Additionally, there are some exceptions for treatment of all living things. People will discuss that even the smallest insect should also receive the same treatment. I think moral treatments of any living thing should just be left to what the people and our brains think is morally right or wrong.…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This controversial topic seems to never end. Should animals have human rights? A supporter of animal rights may say that animals deserve to be treated, as humans whereas a non -supporter may say animals “are irrational and incapable of living in rights” (source). Although both sides of this topic hold evidence and strong points to back up their belief, I truly believe animals should have human rights. Animals deserve rights, and these rights should obliterate animal experimentation, abandonment, and abuse.…

    • 1828 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A specific community may decide that the animals they use for many purposes including food and fur among others do not have rights, which leaves them vulnerable. On the other hand, a community that decides to protect animals rights may choose to define tough measures against those that violate those rights. Without a doubt, this theory is consequential in the sense that it prompts the conversation on animal rights, by asking people to consider animals as beings with feelings. Ultimately, what happens to animals will depend on the beliefs of a specific society since the majority will follow whatever society passes as…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Argument For Animal Rights

    • 1036 Words
    • 4 Pages

    I do not fully believe that animal rights are completely equivalent to human rights, but I hold true to the fact that animals have the right to be treated humanely because animals do have basic senses and emotions. Regan does mention that animals can feel pain and suffering, and I do agree with his view on that. So, what would be the consequences of giving animals rights? The major consequence that I see about giving animals rights is that farm factories would have to be monitored more closely to ensure that animals are being treated fairly and humanely. This means that no animal will be subjected to unnecessary pain and suffering.…

    • 1036 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dr. Adora’s argument claims animals are individuals entitled to nonhuman personhood and that holding animals in captivity, in zoos and in research, is morally wrong. Nonhuman personhood is extended to corporations, zoos, universities, and other entities. Personhood grants these beings rights like accepting monetary gifts, and making independent decisions. One of Adora’s most compelling pieces of evidence is her argument that animals, like human children, should be represented by an agent if needed. In a child’s case this is a parent or guardian, but for an animal it could be a human decision-maker or lawyer.…

    • 1044 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal welfare is how well the animals should be treated. Michael C. Appleby explains animal welfare as, “Ethical concern over the quality of life of animals” (19). If one believes in animal welfare then does one believe in animal rights also? Animals get mistreated in different settings whether circuses, zoos or factories. According to the “Animal Rights Debate” Rich…

    • 1394 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (Animals In). “Some people, including some scientists object to the practice strictly on ethical and moral grounds, refuting or rejecting any scientific evidence that animal testing is helpful to humans.” (Judson 12). However, groups opposing the cruel treatment of animals were influential in getting regulations passed to protect welfare of animals. (Judson 10). A lot of people agree that the leading con of animal testing is how the animals are treated.…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal Welfare Act Essay

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages

    It is propose that way because of the symbolic meaning we put ourselves in with other species. We assume we are the alphas and the other animals as lower than us, regarding to the portrayal, we consume them because we are in control. The issues are exactly the same from the approach that activists oppose to why it stabilize us as a society. The movement is characterized as a social movement by the collective action it has gathered from the abolitionists and welfarism activists to change the treatment towards animals or none in captivity. People fight for the propositions of laws so it can benefit animals and at least tolerate the circumstances the animals have been put into.…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There should be a bill of rights for animals because they exhibit humanlike cognitive abilities and emotions and must be protected from harmful abuse, but these rights must not blur the line with human rights. Animals must be granted a bill of rights because they possess humanlike intellectual skills and feelings. In the Los Angeles Times article “A Change of Heart about Animals,” Jeremy…

    • 1222 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays