Comparing Nietzsche's Beyond Good And Evil

Great Essays
What is right? What is wrong? Can the two even exist or are they just figments of some sort of lesser mentality? These are just a few of the many questions in the world that can not simply be answered by a single sentence as there are too many factors in context. Thus, we, as humans, are forced to reflect on the topic with our own philosophical ideas in hopes that we can piece our ideas with the ideas of others in order to solve this massive jigsaw puzzle dubbed “Life”
In every person there is an innate sense of right and wrong buried within them. This sense guides people, culture, and even entire countries to act in certain ways. Thomas Aquinas called this innate sense the natural law. Natural law is this idea that from nature we can deduce certain things, how things are, and how they should be; it is the order of natural beings that are capable of rational, moral actions, knowledge and truth. The “natural law is appointed by reason” (Aquinas IV, 94, 1) and given to everyone. While contrary to popular belief that right and wrong are relative, the idea of an absolute right ultimately makes sense. For instance, it is naturally understood at some point within all that it is wrong to
…show more content…
He states that the two are in constant battle with one another: the strong (master) fights for the will to power, while the weak (slave) attempts to overthrow the master or, at least, drag them down to their level of class using surreptitious forms of revenge. Nietzsche believed that the slave morality included forms of submission, humility, and obedience and was the attribute of Christianity, while the master’s morality was full of arrogance and pride. Nietzsche attempted to prove that the master morality was the only true path to success in life and that this success was to come at any cost, even of another, weaker

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Nietzsche divides morality into two separate parts, Master Morality and Slave Morality. Master morality having its beginning…

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In essence, God decides morality, the basis of right and wrong. If God says something is right then it is morally right; if God says something is wrong then it also is morally wrong. However, flaws in this theory have caused many people to deny it and believe in Saint Thomas Aquinas Theory of Natural Law. This theory is divided into three parts: the world has values and views built into its nature, describe not only how things are but also how they ought to be, and how do we determine what is tight and wrong. The two theories are opposite in terms of viewpoint but in today's world, but of them are rejected because of conflicting issues.…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche’s book On the Genealogy of Morals covers three different themes in its text. The first topic is morality. The second topic is punishment. The third topic is power. Based off of these topics there are different arguments that stem from them.…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Wilson Fourteen Points

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages

    What changes would wilson's fourteen points have made in a way European nations and the U.S conducted their affairs? Why would these ideas lead to greater peace and security? I. Open covenants of peace, openly arrived at, after which there shall be no private international understandings of any kind but diplomacy shall proceed always frankly and in the public view. II. Absolute freedom of navigation upon the seas, outside territorial waters, alike in peace and in war, except as the seas may be closed in whole or in part by international action for the enforcement of international covenants.…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Are you so much wiser at your age than I am at mine that you understand that wicked people always do some harm to their closet neighbors while good people do them good, but I have reached such a pitch of ignorance that I do not realize this, namely that if I make one of my associates wicked I run the risk of being harmed by him so that I do such a great evil deliberately, as you say?” (25e-26a) In Plato’s dialogue, The Apology, Socrates famously uses the argument that no man knowingly or willingly does harm in order to defend himself against due charge of corrupting the youth. Socrates believed that if he has corrupted the youth, it is involuntarily, and for that reason he ought not to be punished for doing so. Ignorance is the only thing that would cause people to do the wrong thing and cause harm against each other, according to Socrates’ belief.…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Based on one of Friedrich Nietzsche's most distinguished philosophy books ever written during the 18th century, he develops a new philosophical ideal. In the book "Beyond Good and Evil," Nietzsche inquires a philosophy of the future for "free spirits". Nietzsche describes the distinct species of a philosopher, the "free spirits" and contrasts dogmatism with the true free spirits. Through all of this, Conard argued that Bart Simpson was not Nietzsche's ideal while, on the contrary, Felder argues that Carrie Bradshaw embodies the ideals of Nietzsche's new brand of a philosopher. Conard argues that Bart Simpson does not resemble Nietzsche's ideal of the new brand of philosopher because Bart is the complete opposite of what Nietzsche envisioned.…

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Führer, on the other hand, had a more nebulous relationship with Nietzsche’s writings. While Hitler appropriated Nietzsche’s ideas into his ideology, he never actually read his works personally. There were, however, stories and rumors spread throughout Germany regarding the two. Viennese actress Rosa Albach-Petty, for example, reportedly heard a story from a friend of a young workman named Adolf Hitler who asked to borrow Thus Spoke Zarathustra and another book by Nietzsche, saying, “‘almost solemnly,’” “‘I promise you ma’am, that I will cherish the books like life itself.’”…

    • 1550 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    2) What, according to Nietzsche, is wrong with Christian/slave morality? Make sure that your account of slave morality draws from each of the three essays in the Genealogy. Are there any arguments from within Nietzsche’s own text that might place slave morality in a better light? Nietzsche’s Genealogy of Morality is a rejection and appreciation of slave morality.…

    • 1028 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dark Ghettos Essay

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Natural Law theorists argue that moral standards are based on the objective nature of the world and that legal standards derive their authority from these moral standards. Aquinas argues that law is, “Nothing else than an ordinance of reason for the common good, promulgated by him who has the care of the community.” This is very similar to Austin’s command theory, in which laws are commands by a sovereign to citizens, and commands are orders that are backed up by threats. The difference here is that the sovereign can only give orders to their citizens if they are a good person. Aquinas argues that just laws are consistent with natural law and are thus unbreakable, but unjust laws are inconsistent with natural law and are thus…

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Master and slave morality is a prominent theme in Nietzsche’s work Beyond Good and Evil. Master morality is an attitude of being to moral and appalling, respectively. Slave morality is an attitude which holds to the standard of that which is beneficial to the weak or powerless. Besides the differences, there are also similarities between them, including using this relationship as an undertake to getting to the basis of what it means to be “good” or “bad” and both types of morality being equally logical. Master morality emerges first, with slave morality being a reaction to it, as it hints in this quotation: “being noble, wanting to be by oneself, being able to be different, standing alone and having to live independently” (161).…

    • 1426 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Morality as Anti-Nature, Friedrich Nietzsche reveals his philosophical opinion on the use of morals while living and making decisions, rather than relying on innate reasoning. Nietzsche supposes morals and religion are in opposition to life’s passions. “But an attack on the roots of passion means an attack on the roots of life: the practice of the church is hostile to life.” (Nietzsche 348) His immoral views disagree with the “anti-natural morality” reared by the church and Christianity.…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the early 19th a philosopher born in Roeken, Germany showed a promising career as a philosopher. His name is Friedrich Nietzsche. He attacked morality, especially Christianity by considering a convenient tool used between groups to extend control over each other. Nietzsche’s notion of power placed him as one of the most assertive philosopher in criticizing morality. He did not know how much his ideas would travel through time and space.…

    • 1599 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Friedrich Nietzsche on Master and Slave Morality,” an explication by Dr. John Armstrong, explains Friedrich Nietzsche's view on morality that argues Slave Morality is created to restrict “superior” people. To achieve such a claim, Armstrong compares and explains Master Morality and Slave Morality, and he further reveals the flaws of Slave Morality, “[the] artificial boundaries that constrain the strong from reaching their full potential” (5). Opening his analysis, Armstrong chronicles the history of Master and Slave Morality and informs the readers about Friedrich Nietzsche and his motivation for exploring the difference between these moralities. Armstrong reveals that Nietzsche, a philologist, values Master Morality over Slave Morality since it leads to the “peak of Western civilization” (1). Yet, many religions value Slave Morality instead.…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Curtis “Stickman” Brummitt Looking at the history of humanity, one can see that we are a people whom claim to have strong ties to morality, with the ability to actively determine right and wrong, yet every day we stray further and further from the rightness we so often claim to possess. Poets and writers, already known for criticizing humanity for its every flaw, have unsurprisingly leapt at the opportunity to again berate humans for their disregard for doing the right thing. “We must cultivate our garden.” The final crew in Voltaire’s Candide meet up with a wise, normal Muslim man near the end of the book.…

    • 1700 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The concept of ‘law’ has proven itself a tricky one to articulate. Despite its relevance within society, it is hard to condense the idea of law down to its core tenets. In their quest for a concise definition, legal theorists have approached law from different angles, and have tended to divide themselves into two groups – those who believe that any summation of law must include reference to morality, and those who believe that the idea of law either can or must be completely distinguished from any moral considerations. This essay will consider the views of hard and soft legal positivists Joseph Raz and H.L.A. Hart, and natural law theorist Thomas Aquinas, in order to argue that, while all of these theories capture something of the relationship…

    • 1632 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays