Master And Slave Morality In Nietzsche's Beyond Good And Evil

Great Essays
Master and slave morality is a prominent theme in Nietzsche’s work Beyond Good and Evil. Master morality is an attitude of being to moral and appalling, respectively. Slave morality is an attitude which holds to the standard of that which is beneficial to the weak or powerless. Besides the differences, there are also similarities between them, including using this relationship as an undertake to getting to the basis of what it means to be “good” or “bad” and both types of morality being equally logical.
Master morality emerges first, with slave morality being a reaction to it, as it hints in this quotation: “being noble, wanting to be by oneself, being able to be different, standing alone and having to live independently” (161). Master morality
…show more content…
This inversion of values (which includes using the world ‘poor’ as synonyms with ‘holy’ and ‘friend’) constitutes the significance of the Jewish people: they mark the beginning of the slave rebellion in morals” (195). From this quotation, readers can see the repetition of “Jews” throughout, and this emphasis is evident that Nietzsche has a convinced desire in his text, and the readers can feel strong reactions when coming across that. Nietzsche essentially says “inversion of values,” and it led to new meanings of “good” and “bad”, which implies slave morality. The Jews, being frail and troubled, outwardly did not have a way to be “good”. Nietzsche, based off his tone, views the Jews as accountable for the rebellion that shaped slave morality. They established a negative dislike for the masters, which is called ressentiment. In …show more content…
If one cannot command, then one must follow. There is no in between. Why is it hard to be independent in this world? Independence is threatening because people are contingent on desire. Instead of grounding good and bad on the penalties of an occurrence, slaves base ethics and morals on the purposes of an occurrence. Because master morality initiates from one being strong, slave morality initiates from one being the weak, so perhaps the slaves are essentially envious of the masters. The slaves do not try to be masters and noble, but the slaves try to make the masters slaves. Master morality, for Nietzsche, is formed by the willpower to control and discoveries its morality based on whether or not something is beneficial people because “the noble type of man experiences itself as determining values; it does not need approval; it judges …” (227). The first condition of ruling is that it should come in a bare condition and have a will resilient enough. Free will, for example, is when one has done the alteration that one wants to pursue. Master morality is self-causation. No restriction. No divisions. No moral sense. Essentially, if something contributes to one’s self-esteem and self-assurance, it is respectable; nevertheless, if something or someone delays one’s and their development, it is bad, like slaves, which is why slave morality is a morality of struggling but responding to the oppression at

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Just as are some are by nature free, so others are by nature slaves, and for these latter the condition of slavery is both essential and just” (Aristotle, Right Thing To DO pp 202). In Aristotle’s mind, the difference between a freeman and a slave is that a slave is obedient and will not mind doing forced labor, while freemen would run away or rebel if he was enslaved, since it would be unnatural for a freeman to be a slave.…

    • 1441 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Society today neither fears humanity yet has no hope for its prosperity, a nihilistic attitude that Nietzsche rejects. His largest criticism of slave morality is its developing from hatred and denial. Slave morality devalues life because instead of focusing on personal ambitions and motivations, the resentful person is consumed with their hateful passions. However, slave morality still lacks discipline and self-control and breeds men less clever than the resentful man. But the dichotomy between the slave morality and master morality is too simple.…

    • 1597 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    While a utilitarian is seemingly only concerned with overall happiness, as dictated by the principle of utility, there are checks on the doctrine that Mill introduces to maintain its plausibility. First, while Mill does acknowledge the superiority of intellectual pleasures, suggesting that the above example should hold, the assault on the human dignity of the slaves, a component of happiness which Mill considers to be indispensable, actually elevates their pain to more than what an animal is capable of suffering (¶6). For example, a slave would not only feel the physical pain of labor, but they would also reflect on that pain, question their current state, and fear what is to come. It is their capacity for reason that deepens the suffering, thus their loss of dignity is actually more than what is gained by their…

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his essay Genealogy of Morality, Nietzsche suggests that there are two types of morality: master morality and slave morality. Slave morality values virtues like humility, sympathy and kindness. Slave morality sees opposite with noble man, who conceives ‘good’ in advance and spontaneity: the ‘bad’ and ‘evil’ originates from noble man arising out of insatiable hatred. This is the essential act of conception of slave morality (Friedrich Nietzsche sec. 11).…

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (I:16) Lastly, Nietzsche brings up the notion that grammar has led us to think of things as independent subject and actions when in reality subjects are nothing but actions. (I:17) With this emphasis of separation, Nietzsche sees how the slave morality, or the weak, can conceive that to be “good” is to not have strength by not killing or enduring hardship, ultimately seeing their weakness as freedom, which he notes is…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Friedrich Nietzsche on Master and Slave Morality,” an explication by Dr. John Armstrong, explains Friedrich Nietzsche's view on morality that argues Slave Morality is created to restrict “superior” people. To achieve such a claim, Armstrong compares and explains Master Morality and Slave Morality, and he further reveals the flaws of Slave Morality, “[the] artificial boundaries that constrain the strong from reaching their full potential” (5). Opening his analysis, Armstrong chronicles the history of Master and Slave Morality and informs the readers about Friedrich Nietzsche and his motivation for exploring the difference between these moralities. Armstrong reveals that Nietzsche, a philologist, values Master Morality over Slave Morality since it leads to the “peak of Western civilization” (1). Yet, many religions value Slave Morality instead.…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    At first, the masters were considered good, powerful, and wealthy, while the slaves were considered bad, weak, and poor. Overtime, morality shifted and the masters were considered evil and the slaves were considered good. This transition occurred because of ressentiment, in other words, the idea that one’s identity is dependent upon others, in particular one’s hatred of what they are not. The slaves identified through hatred and would rather blame others for their problems instead of fixing it themselves. The masters identified with themselves; they were dependent upon no one.…

    • 1081 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Where now the poor see themselves as ‘good’ and the powerful are now ‘evil’. So the moral code changed from what was ‘good’ became ‘evil’ and what was once ‘bad’ became ‘good’. The noble man’s good is precisely what the man of resentment calls ‘evil’. Justice is an invention of slave morality made out as an ideal that masters bravely disregard. Slave morality does not seek revenge, but waits for the “judgement of god” that will restore…

    • 1781 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Masters” come closest to the purest expression of the Will-to-Power5, which is Nietzsche’s variant on Schopenhauer’s view of the noumenal6. Through this depiction of the ‘master morality’ it is evident to realize why the ‘master’ might be perceived as preferable by Nietzsche. Apart from this morality, Nietzsche coins another kind of morality, opposite to the master, in which Nietzsche depicts it with a negative connotation and sharper tongue: “the slave…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Essay I of Nietzsche’s The Genealogy of Morals, ‘Good and Evil’, ‘Good and Bad’, Nietzsche attempts to study the origin of contemporary morality by examining the conditions and circumstances by which the values of morals have emerged. This investigation of his, lead him to conclude that the morals that exist in us now, are not inherent in us, but were caused by a “slave revolt” in morality through the feeling of ressentiment. In this essay, I will be discussing what ressentiment is, why and where it came from, and how it is associated with morals according to Nietzsche. Ressentiment is basically a reactive feeling to a sustained and repeated condition of powerlessness of a weaker social class against another more powerful class. Ressentiment is a kind of envy in such a way that the slave does not have the means to express it or let it out.…

    • 1815 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays