Analysis Of The Texas Vs. Johnson Case 1984 By Gregory Lee Johnson

Decent Essays
Is there a Constitutional right to burning the American Flag? Does the First Amendment give permission to destroy a pronounced symbol into ash? In the Texas vs. Johnson case, 1984, Gregory Lee Johnson burned an American flag in a protest at the Republican National Convention in Dallas, Texas . While Texas argued it as a criminal offense, the Supreme Court argued, along with the First Amendment, that even though the proper treatment of the flag is encouraged, the action could be portrayed as a freedom of speech. So, does a state have a right to uphold it’s own laws, even if they don’t align with the federal law? In favor of Texas, states should be able to defend their own laws to protect the peace, respect the veterans and soldiers who protect

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Case name: Rankin v. McPherson, 483 U.S. 378 (1987) Facts: Ardith McPherson was appointed a deputy in the Constable’s office of Harris County, Texas, on January 12, 1981. Her duties were only clerical. On March 30, 1981, McPherson discussed with her boyfriend, and fellow employee, a report about an attempt to assassinate the President of the United States. She made the remark “If they go for him again, I hope they get him”. Her remark was reported to Constable Rankin, who fired McPherson, even though she told him she did not mean anything by it.…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In January of 1983 Nancy Beth Cruzan lost control of her car on a icy Missouri road. This accident left Nancy brain damaged and was left in a “permanent vegetative state”. She could breath on her own but other than that there was nothing she could do on her own and she showed no signs of thinking capabilities. The doctors put a feeding tube into her stomach about month after the accident.…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gregory Johnson Case

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The flag is supposed to be a symbol of “nationhood” and “unity” (O’Brien 705). In Texas, treats the flag poorly than they are violating the statute. Government may not ban expression because it may be offensive. The First Amendment was ratified for that reason. In Street v. New York (1969) the Court ruled a person cannot be punished for yelling hateful words at the flag.…

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Texas police were dispatched to Lawrence's apartment complex in response to a reported weapons disturbance. Houston police entered Lawrence's apartment and saw him and another man, Garner, engaging in a consensual sexual act. The case began with the arrest of a Houston resident, John Lawrence. Lawrence and Garner were detained and held in police custody overnight. Both men were charged with violating the Texas "Homosexual Conduct" law.…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When the privacy of students comes into question there are mixed responses, especially when it comes to the contents of a student’s bag. From the landmark supreme court case TLO v. New Jersey, the privacy students have in school has inevitably come into question. Whether TLO or New Jersey was right, this court case changed the way we look at students and their privacy. Some may argue that students have no privacy in school while others may think they have too much. Has the Supreme Court already decided where they stand on this hot button topic?…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If it’s the state’s fate that’s at stake, they have the right to choose it. No one can take that away. “The crisis upon us involves not only the right of self government, but the maintenance of a great principle in the law of nations,” (Document C). As O.M. Roberts says, Texas or any other state has the right to have the choice to either secede or stay because of…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This has become an especially touchy subject with the rise of controversy concerning the confederate flag. The confederate flag has become a sore subject with the rise of racial tension within the nation. California has gone as far as to ban the Confederate flag. The question arises; is banning the Confederate flag constitutional? Flying it could be considered a form of symbolic speech and by banning it in public spaces governments could infringe on first amendment rights.…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Illegal to Burn the U.S. Flag “The Congress and the states shall have the power to prohibit the physical desecration of the flag of the United States.” That was the proposed constitutional amendment that was sent before the Constitution subcommittee on May 25th, 1995. The amendment passed the subcommittee and then was presented before the full Judiciary Committee. The amendment was in response to the Supreme Court rulings in 1989 and 1990 that demolished federal and state statutes prohibiting flag desecration. This was seen as an obstruction to the First Amendment which protects free speech and expression.…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The first amendment protects freedom of speech, but does it give somebody the right to burn the flag? Gregory Lee Johnson was sentenced one year in prison and was fined $2,000 for burning the U.S flag at a convention in Dallas in 1984. The Texas vs. Johnson case was taken to Supreme Court and the court has determined that burning the flag is a criminal offense, they also had to prove how it isn’t related to the first amendment, and how prohibiting the desecration of the flag was narrowly tailored to furthering this interest. Freedom of speech is protected by the first amendment and it basically means anyone has the right to speak their mind or express it. When Johnson doused the national flag in kerosene and lit it on fire, Texas saw it as…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The First Amendment should not defend flag desecration because the flag is venerated. Also burning a flag is an action of behavior not an act of speech. Since most disapprove of flag burning, the government should have a right to ban it (Whitman). While using flag-burning as a way to express anger towards the government, it is very controversial whether it is right or wrong. Some may believe that the First amendment should protect this action, however some believe that the burning the flag should be handled differently and not protected because it is offensive.…

    • 165 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, due to this case flag burning has been protected as freedom of speech since 1984. The actions occurred at the end of a political rally. "Taking offense" at political action is not, the Court ruled, sufficient reason to suppress speech or expression (Pearson).The Senate has rejected a proposal for amending the U.S. Constitution to allow Congress to ban burning or desecrating the American flag. According to a Gallup Poll and USA today, the majority of Americans support a constitutional amendment that would allow Congress and state governments to make it illegal to burn the Americans flag.…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Roe v. Wade was not the first point in history abortion was discussed. Prior to the court case, many states, and eventually the Supreme Court, ruled on the constitutionality of state laws which preluded Roe v. Wade. In 1879, a Connecticut law was enacted stating that any one person who attempted through medical means to prevent conception of a child should “be fined not less than forty dollars or imprisoned no less than sixty days” (“Griswold v. Connecticut…”). This meant that any form of contraceptive (i.e. birth control, condoms, and abortion) was illegal in the eyes of the Connecticut state court. In 1939, the Waterbury Maternal Health Center in Waterbury, Connecticut was raided by police for their practice which helped “married women who could not afford private…

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Eichman, it can also be seen that judicial restraint is applied. Judicial restraint can be seen in the Eichman case because the Court respected the precedent decision of Texas v. Johnson, a case ruled about a year prior. In Texas v. Johnson, the Supreme Court ruled that desecrating the American flag is protected under First Amendment rights. The Court stated that it is not acceptable for the law to criminalize an action just because it is “offensive or disagreeable” in nature. In United States v. Eichman, the Supreme Court simply upheld this ruling, with just a few more provisions.…

    • 1309 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Johnson). In the court case United States vs. Eichman, The Supreme Court reviewed a decision made by Congress to prohibit the burning of flags, determining that this is unconstitutional as one cannot be punished solely because his or her thoughts are offensive (ACLU). The Supreme Court deemed it unconstitutional for Texas to apply a law that prevented a man from expressing his thoughts just because the state believed it to be extremely offensive (ACLU). This amendment would actually increase the speculation as to how this expression should specifically be regulated (ACLU). Professor Goldstein documented only about 45 incidents of flag burning in the past 200 years between the adoption of the flag in 1777 and the creation of the Flag Protection Act in 1989, which was rejected by the Supreme Court (ACLU).…

    • 1866 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Introduction The case study involves Hernandez versus Texas this was a Mexican – American civil right case which was recorded as the first one. The case was listened by States Supreme Court this was after the Second World War. Historically it was around 1950. The case was involved murder the named Pete Hernandez who was a cotton picker was accused of killing Joe Espinosa. They were no Mexican who has served on the jury for more than twenty-five years.…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays