Introduction
The case study involves Hernandez versus Texas this was a Mexican – American civil right case which was recorded as the first one. The case was listened by States Supreme Court this was after the Second World War. Historically it was around 1950. The case was involved murder the named Pete Hernandez who was a cotton picker was accused of killing Joe Espinosa. They were no Mexican who has served on the jury for more than twenty-five years. Garcia was one of the experienced lawyers who decided to represent the accused without charging him the fee. The case ended with the defendant being the quilt.
Core Issues and History
The core issues in the Hernandez case as the history of the problem. The core issues were that the Mexican had not served on any jury for twenty-five years. The lawyer agreed to represent the accused without charging him anything. This was unexpected since the accused was found guilty. The case was heard on 11th January 1954. During this arguments, there was the need for amendment of the since Garcia argued that the law was guarantying not only the race but also the class. (Kevin, 1954) According to the Texas law, the fourth amendment only covered the white and the blacks but not the class. …show more content…
Garcia argued that this was discrimination since they were excluding the class. According to the state, this was coincident since there is no Spanish character had served on any jury for twenty-five years. He also added that this was neither a Patten nor altitude of the state. The lawyer by the name Garcia and his associate presented the evidence that there were discrimination and segregation was just normal and that the Mexican- American were treated unequally with others. This was not the best of them. (Kevin, 1954) Relevant background events, laws, etc Furthermore, the relevant background events, laws the question seek the court cases, legislation, or the executive acts and rulings that define the issue. According to Chief Justice Earl argued that the case against the accused Hernandez was unfair therefore the court ordered the reversal of the conviction. According to his the court agreed that there was a discrimination of class. He started that when the law produces a justice …show more content…
Race and discrimination judged the accused that is Hernandez. His lawyer was not shocked to see that the accused was termed as guilty but rather he went ahead to search for evidence to prove that the state laws was using the amendments which were renewed to judge the minor group.
The issues were resolved after the change of the amendments. This was after replacing the sections during 1930 to 1970. The change was made in the year 1971. This was the time that the accused was proven innocent. The state laws accepted that Hispanic was a minority group. The citizen right was achieved through challenging the court order, this by presenting the evidence that the judgment was reached through bias race and the class. After the chief judge had been convinced about it, he ordered a change through the power of the constitution. This was how the citizenship arrived together with the final judgment. The case was fair in 1971. (Handbook of Texas Online,
The case study involves Hernandez versus Texas this was a Mexican – American civil right case which was recorded as the first one. The case was listened by States Supreme Court this was after the Second World War. Historically it was around 1950. The case was involved murder the named Pete Hernandez who was a cotton picker was accused of killing Joe Espinosa. They were no Mexican who has served on the jury for more than twenty-five years. Garcia was one of the experienced lawyers who decided to represent the accused without charging him the fee. The case ended with the defendant being the quilt.
Core Issues and History
The core issues in the Hernandez case as the history of the problem. The core issues were that the Mexican had not served on any jury for twenty-five years. The lawyer agreed to represent the accused without charging him anything. This was unexpected since the accused was found guilty. The case was heard on 11th January 1954. During this arguments, there was the need for amendment of the since Garcia argued that the law was guarantying not only the race but also the class. (Kevin, 1954) According to the Texas law, the fourth amendment only covered the white and the blacks but not the class. …show more content…
Garcia argued that this was discrimination since they were excluding the class. According to the state, this was coincident since there is no Spanish character had served on any jury for twenty-five years. He also added that this was neither a Patten nor altitude of the state. The lawyer by the name Garcia and his associate presented the evidence that there were discrimination and segregation was just normal and that the Mexican- American were treated unequally with others. This was not the best of them. (Kevin, 1954) Relevant background events, laws, etc Furthermore, the relevant background events, laws the question seek the court cases, legislation, or the executive acts and rulings that define the issue. According to Chief Justice Earl argued that the case against the accused Hernandez was unfair therefore the court ordered the reversal of the conviction. According to his the court agreed that there was a discrimination of class. He started that when the law produces a justice …show more content…
Race and discrimination judged the accused that is Hernandez. His lawyer was not shocked to see that the accused was termed as guilty but rather he went ahead to search for evidence to prove that the state laws was using the amendments which were renewed to judge the minor group.
The issues were resolved after the change of the amendments. This was after replacing the sections during 1930 to 1970. The change was made in the year 1971. This was the time that the accused was proven innocent. The state laws accepted that Hispanic was a minority group. The citizen right was achieved through challenging the court order, this by presenting the evidence that the judgment was reached through bias race and the class. After the chief judge had been convinced about it, he ordered a change through the power of the constitution. This was how the citizenship arrived together with the final judgment. The case was fair in 1971. (Handbook of Texas Online,