Analysis Of Rough Justice By Alejandro Reyes

Improved Essays
Canning or death sentences, you may as well consider them to be the same thing. “Rough Justice” written by Alejandro Reyes, gives more reasoning toward the case of Michael Fay with the author's use of evidence. After carefully analyzing the two text, the reader realizes that the article “Rough Justice” has the most relevant evidence to support it because the author includes more facts and statistics which allows the reader to better side with his view. Throughout the article, Reyes provides the reader with strong facts to allow the reader to better understand what is happening. In the article Reyes states, “The Vandalism Act of 1966 was originally conceived as a legal weapon to combat the spread of mainly political graffiti common during …show more content…
For example in the Editorial, the author says, “There is a clear problem with this argument” (“Time to Assert American Values” 179). The sentence is highly opinionated because someone may not think that there is a problem with the argument that “dissidents, democrats and reformers in these countries are somehow less authentic representatives of their cultures than the members of the political elite who enforce oppressive punishments and suppress individual rights” (“Time to Assert American Values 179). This statement is bias based on the fact that democrats of our country are rebels and act out against what they do not believe in when someone may think the opposite. The author of any work can not provide the reader with their own opinions because it will be less likely that the reader will agree with what they are trying to say. In addition to the authors previous biased statements, he/she includes, “A case like Michael Fay’s is important because it provides a chance to challenge an inhumane practice that ought not to exist anywhere” (“Time to Assert American Values 179). The quote above shows us the author's view on what happen to Michael Fay when in reality, if you are trying to persuade someone to feel a certain way, you want to use facts and statistics not personal feelings. Even though the article did provide some evidence, “Time to Assert American Values” is an editorial and editorials are proven to be bias and focus on what the writer believes rather than factual

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Two cultures in different locations will not have the same perspective on topics, it’s a known idea created from deductive reasoning. “Time to Assert American Values” also presents their claim by using some fallacies. The idea that “this country was also founded by dissidents” who “believed it was wrong to punish pilferage with hanging or crimes of any sort with torture” is a hasty generalization (“Time to Assert American Values” 180). A statement like this is faulty reasoning because it doesn’t explore the fact we used to punish crimes the same way. Another example of the same concept is when explaining how Americans who are “express[ing] outrage over a punishment that causes permanent scarring” are being “culturally arrogant”(“Time to Assert American Values” 180).…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In contrast, Michael Levin advocates in favor of the latter ideology. He does not argue that torture should be used casually, rather his argument stems from the premise that nations should not be so quick to ban torture in every single circumstance. His primary rhetorical strategy is to use hypothetical extremes to prove his point, in addition, he also appeals to emotion to evoke a sense towards Utilitarianism to justify torture in certain cases. His primary downfall in his argument was that many of his hypothetical have yet to be seen in real life, in light of this, it may delegitimize his argument in certain people’s minds. Gushee’s argument was particularly effective because of his employment of historical…

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Time to Assert American Values” uses logical evidence because it shows facts and information on how punishments should be handled. “Rough Justice” uses anecdotal evidence to show how they judge people by a witness who probably didn’t even see what really happened. “Rough Justice” has many reasons of why that particular story is more credible than “Time to Assert American Values.” Alejandro uses imagery to make the reader understand what would happened if they broke the law. There are many reason to why people got punished like rape, carry weapons, and if your visa expired. This story uses Michael Fay’s story as…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For example, by describing the problem that the commission came across when identifying the immorality of the death penalty they were able to transition the paper smoothly. They explain why morality is not a good precursor for setting laws because of the erratics of social understanding. They point out the advantages of employing moral precepts yet, it is flawed as they explain and so they attack this flaw. Using a conditional they state that in a democratic society it is within the people's interests to set laws according to their shared beliefs. It seems rather contradicting to make that claim since earlier they stated that it is impossible to align the views of individuals with governing bodies.…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The first flaw in Garcia’s work is when he states “Racism, then, is something that essentially involves not our beliefs and their rationality or irrationality, but our wants, intentions, likes, and dislikes and their distance from the moral virtues. (236) The problem with this statement is how Garcia attempts to challenge the belief-based theory. Garcia attempts to disprove the counter of race being a social construction by saying that race need not be a thing for racism to still exist. His reasoning is that “People make distinctions in their hearts, whether consciously or not on the basis of their racial classifications.” (236) This reasoning is a weak way to justify the root of slavery. Racism is something that is more convoluted than a distinction in one’s heart.…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Egocentric Blindness

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages

    There are two quotes that offer an alternative view on the main points of the paper, they are, “the roadblock to enlightenment is both ignorance and the illusion of knowledge” and to help decipher that is the quote, “The antidote to ignorance is knowledge” (Scanlin, Dr). This being said, to eradicate the widespread ignorance in America there must be an influx of pure, objective information. Even though egocentric blindness can be difficult to distinguish from egocentric memory there is a key difference. To clarify, egocentric memory tendency to forget evidence and information that rivals preconceived notions but egocentric blindness is the tendency not to notice the information in the first place. To help illustrate egocentric blindness here is an artificial scenario, there is a supporter of Hillary Clinton and a Donald Trump supporter who become locked in a political argument.…

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Hart recognizes that morality and law share qualities, as in duties and obligations, but he holds that Aquinas confuses the two to an unreasonable extent. He goes so far as to equate the statement regarding the unjust law with one expressing that a statute is not a statute (Hart 8). This is not an especially strong refutation of Aquinas, if only because Hart is exercising here the same exaggeration he charges Aquinas of presenting. It is arguable that a more valid opposition would refer to the reality that what is moral alters in any society over time, and thus any reliance on morality to determine the worth of law is inherently suspect. As noted, this reality is certainly evident in American history.…

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to James Fearon’s “Counterfactuals and Hypothesis Testing in Political Science” (1991), “Counterfactuals make claims about events that did not actually occur...such propositions play a necessary and fundamental, if often implicit and underdeveloped, role in the efforts of political scientists to assess their hypotheses about the causes of the phenomena they study” (Fearon, p.169). Not only does Fearon’s definition help generate a better understanding of Barnett et al.’s counterfactual approach, but much of his essay is also deliberately cited by Barnett et al. in order to illustrate their study’s scientific validity and credibility. Lastly,…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his writing piece from paragraphs 15-22, Dr. King attempts to impress on the reader that he was righteous in his method of civil disobedience to bring around change. Dr. King uses juxtaposition and rhetorical questions as a means to help “shine a light” on his justification for his methods, and then really lay emphasis on his reasoning. Furthermore, in his use of pronouns and his gentle yet rigid, unmoving tone he helps to transport the reader into “Dr. King’s world” where everyone is the same, so as these laws is hindering some of the community, the civil disobedience underway is necessary. Finally and most prominently Dr. King really tries to reason with the reader through logos, and helps use morality to help convey how his methods…

    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Given the first example is purely impractical, the second one is blatantly a violation of the first amendment of the constitution. Ultimately, people act out of fear and from a false definition of nationalism in which people use it as a way to feel connected to the state and to its contributions to society. This arrogance that is created causes people to individualize American society as well as imagine they own a part of American culture, only to demonize beliefs that do not match up with their own (i.e. healthcare, welfare, marriage rights). This lays true when people disagree with state use of funds as they argue, “well I pay for that (or them) with my taxes”, therefore I should have a say in every expenditure that is possible.…

    • 1527 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays