People use language to express their feelings and views on something, but, the language Katie Hopkins’ uses in her article against the migrants is revolting and very insulting to many people. In the …show more content…
For example, British drivers have to pay a fine every time one of the migrants sneak into their trucks, without the drivers knowledge. People might feel sympathetic towards the drivers, being fined for something they’re not in control of. Some of the pictures she provides in the article, show migrants hiding under trucks, waiting for other trucks to pass by so they can get on one. Katie Hopkins decided to show you the complications of the migrants illegally coming to Britain, instead of making the reader sympathetic, she is trying to get them on her side.
Most migrants arriving to their desired country are the young, most dynamic generation, leaving the elderly who can’t fend for themselves behind, therefore, worsening their country’s condition. Katie Hopkins advises the migrants to “get creative” in their own country, which can possibly improve it. Leaving behind people who are not capable of caring for themselves, won’t help improve their country. It takes more than one person to change a country who might not have resources to “get creative”, but i still do agree that they should try and make a