Peter Singer Argument

Improved Essays
In this paper, I will summarize and compartmentalize the main idea and arguments made by the philosopher Peter Singer in his excerpt from How Are We to Live called The Good life. Singer starts off the excerpt asking the audience why are we so connected for our kin, and later expounds on that question by asking why is it that we are people starting to care for strangers. These questions help birth the main idea of the excerpt which is the power of the brain and how it sets us apart from all other species by giving us the ability to reason. This main idea branches off into three parts first being what does reasoning do for us, secondly, how is reason connected with the ethical, and finally, how does “the point of view of the universe” help aid …show more content…
Singer wants us to distance ourselves from our own point of view, and take on a wider perspective, which he calls “the point of view of the universe”. In this there are three different views dictated by reason the first being, the subjective view. This view puts your interests and desires as the number one priority. You care for your friends and family and push strangers’ interests and desires behind your own. The same way reasoning allows you to think subjectively it also allows you to think objectively and put yourself in the shoes of a stranger. This allows you to realize that your interests and desires are no more important than the strangers around you, essentially allowing you to see how the universe would look like with no personal perspective. Instead of viewing the universe with a subjective or objective mind set, Singer argues that a healthy mix of the two allows for the best mind set, which is conciseness. If you live too subjective the world would be clouded with desire, and if you live too objective there would be no desires, which would lead to a loss of value and ultimately a loss ethics. Your ability to reason should show you the suffering of others, while at the same time realize that it is similar to your own suffering and it matters just as

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Peter Singer Poverty

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In this essay “The Singer Solution to World Poverty” Peter Singer is trying to persuade the society that the world hunger and poverty will be solved if people from wealthy society donate the money that spend on their luxuries to the aid organization. He gives two controversies examples of Dora’s situation and Bob’s situation which help to strengthen his argument. From that examples it is also supports his arguments in favor of his altruistic position. On the other hand he also address the objections to his arguments which is “fair share” and “the limit of the donation.…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since the inception of humanity, the ongoing argument has reigned of whether man is basically evil or good. Accompanying this argument is the question: Does humanity have free will to act upon the universe as we please or are we fate’s puppet to do as fate deems worthy? In Loung Ung’s, First They Killed My Father and William Shakespeare’s Macbeth, both question and argument are laid to rest as both authors open the window to the human soul with the cruelty of humans and the differing opinions of good and evil. As philosopher Thomas Hobbes said, “Moral philosophy is nothing else but the science of what is good, and evil, in the conversation, and society of humanity.…

    • 139 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Peter Singer Ethics

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the book, The Ethics of What We Eat by Peter Singer and Jim Mason, many things are covered about the “ethical choices that surround food” (pg. 4). They follow and study three American families, whose diets, lifestyle, and beliefs are all different. While with these families, they are gathering data about the foods they eat and where they come from. In the second half of the book, they follow the Motavalli-Masarech family. Jim and Mary Ann, with their 2 daughters, are considered “conscientious omnivores” (pg. 91).…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nature has enslaved people since the beginning of time. As humans have developed they have overcome oceans, plagues, nomadism, and other organisms. Most recently scientists have created means to overcome the biological constraints of agriculture, and the plant that has contributed the most is corn. Pollan stated. “corn has done more than any other species to help the food industry realize the dream of freeing food from nature’s limitations.(91)” thesis Modern corn now is genetically changed to have the qualities wanted in corn commodity.…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The question, to what extent of responsibility each human has, on this planet, to help those less fortunate, is not easily answered. Its important to consider that each individual in the world has different morals. We were taught various values that make us who we are today. Therefore, to lump all humans together as having an equal responsibility to assist those in need, is not feasibly possible. No matter how we feel, some people will always give more than they are accountable, and others will not give at all.…

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To get into more depth of this idea of…

    • 260 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Peter Singer’s drowning child experiment focuses on this concept if a child was drowning in a shallow puddle, would you save the baby or would you leave the baby to die in the puddle? The experiment tells people to look at saving the baby based on the fact that saving this child would leave your clothes muddy or in terms of the lecture, your expensive boots ruined. Some may believe that the risk of getting their clothes dirty or ruining their boots would not make them save the baby, but most would say that the small cost of saving a baby’s life is worth more than the boots or the clothes. These material objects are not as worthy compared to a human life. After analyzing the baby in the puddle, Singer brings up the idea that if you had ten dollars and you could donate it to save a life anywhere in the world, in the video he explains donating it to Unicef, could save a baby’s life just like the one in the puddle.…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Peter Singer's Beliefs

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This article discusses whether Pete Singer is somewhat correct or incorrect in the thought process of people having the choice to murder disabled infants for their “best interest.” The author of this article seemed bias to Peter Singer’s beliefs until the end where he argues against him. The author starts the article off by stating Peter Singer’s positions and respect received throughout his philosophy. He also mentioned the people opposed to Singer’s beliefs. Then he went into detail about Peter Singer and his ridiculous perspectives.…

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They may look at different idealisms, focus on preserving their idealisms, and they may succumb to the pressure of other idealisms and truths. As a result they may come to regret, and learn the significance of…

    • 1816 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Everyday millions of people around the world suffer in circumstances, in which they could die from lack of proper care and resources. In Famine, Affluence, and Morality, Peter Singer acknowledges this issue facing humanity and argues for the moral obligation to give large amounts of money to those in need. Singer believes that all who are able should be giving up many, if not all of their luxuries to help give the less fortunate their necessities. I will begin by summarizing the argument that Singer dictates in his article and then explain my reasoning for believing his notions to be sound and valid.…

    • 2212 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    (Intro) Peter Singer’s “Famine, Affluence, and Morality” and Garrett Hardin’s “Lifeboat ethics” are contradictory philosophical works that examine whether scarce resources should be shared with the poor. Singer’s argument is that “suffering and death from lack of food, shelter and medical care are bad" (Singer, 1972); therefore all people become morally obligated to help the poor. While Hardin argues that ethics of a Lifeboat should be followed because there is a finite amount of resources available at our disposal (Hardin, 1974, pp.566). Both authors take extreme positions by providing opposing arguments on whether we should be involved in helping the famine or not. This essay will analyze the rational of both authors’ while trying…

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Peter Singer ultimately believes that we are morally obligated to help those who need help and are suffering. He provides various arguments that support his belief that everyone should help the dying people of East Bengal. He starts off by assuming one thing, “suffering and death from lack of food, shelter, and medical care are bad.” This assumption serves as a foundation for his many claims since it provides a definition for what he considers bad. Furthermore, his first claim is that we are morally obligated to stop bad things from happening only if we do not have to sacrifice something of equal value.…

    • 2138 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In All Animals Are Equal, the philosopher Peter Singer argues that we should extend the basic principle of equality to non-human animals. In order to justify this claim, the author examines the foundations of the basic principle of equality, establishing a moral system that takes into account the equal consideration of interests of living beings. Peter Singer states that in order for a being to have interests at all, one must take into account the capacity of suffering and enjoyment, or in other words, sentience. Throughout this chapter, Singer makes his readers see that if one rejects racism and sexism, one must also reject the idea of giving special consideration to the interests of one species over another one. In this essay, I will firstly reconstruct the arguments used by Singer to arrive at the conclusion that all animals are equal.…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper I will reconstruct Singer’s argument as well as argue why his argument is unsound. In Singer’s paper, Famine, Affluence and Morality, he argues that any kind of suffering from lack of food, healthcare and shelter is a bad thing. He further argues that if we have the ability to prevent something bad from happening, that it is our duty as moral beings to prevent suffering unless we have to sacrifice something of significant moral importance. In class we called it the prevent suffering principle. An example that Singer gives is of the prevent suffering principle is to imagine a young child drowning in a shallow pond.…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Plato's Apology Argument

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This widened view of the world maximizes morality and understanding, and accelerates the flow of intelligent ideas. Socrates displays this in his wisdom and his actions, and Murphy describes this with his “piece of mind” analogy. Every individual may have their own opinions about how an intelligent and moral life is lived, but a philosophical attitude allows one to reside in a world of uncertainty with…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays