Continental Congress's Decision To Revise The Constitution

Superior Essays
In this document, James Madison explains the reasoning of the Continental Congress’s decision to revise the Articles of Confederation. Many events such as national bankruptcy, tension with the British and problems in Massachusetts occurred and showcased the weaknesses of the current Articles. Madison is quick to proclaim the futility of those Articles unless a provision is placed on them. A solution which various leaders, including Madison, supported was the idea of a centralized government rather than the separate ones in each state.

The significance of the document is the information that James Madison supplies on the reasoning of the decision to make the Constitution. Madison was the chief recorder of information and a representative
…show more content…
Due to Congress having too much power over state laws and small states having less say in the national government compared to larger states, the Virginia Plan faced rejection. The New Jersey Plan didn’t fare well either so a compromise to incorporate both portions of each proposal is created.

Butler’s document demonstrates the views of federalists and anti-federalist which is significant. Picks up laws and regulations from both sides to reach an accord in which both sides have a say and can agree on them. Many important decisions relating to representatives and state legislature were solved within the convention. The document shows that the delegates were making progress into finalizing a compromise that would work for the people.

In his letter, Elbridge states his reason for not signing the Constitution. He thinks the Constitution doesn’t meet the people’s needs and fears that it may be too vague. He reason the need for a Bill of Rights,which would prevent local laws from state to state to change, would help balance the equality of all states. Nevertheless, Gerry thinks the document has prospect, but only if a few improvements are made to

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Summarize Plans from the Constitutional Convention In the reference of “Virginia Plan” by Levy, Leonard W (2000), it states that the central government was no longer able to stand against the state encroachments under the Article of Confederation. In order to solve this problem, at the Constitutional Convention of 1787, Virginia Plan, draft by James Madison, was established to centralize the power of the government and bicameral Congress, one house elected by the people, and the other one was by the first house, to be nominated based on population of a state or its financial statue. This plan enhanced the power of the legislature of the government which prevented the state legislation from contradicting the national harmony. On the other hand, state laws could be vetoed by the Congress with the agreement of the Executive and Judicial.…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of these was known as the Madison’s Virginia Plan. This was by James Madison who was from Virginia. A national form of government should be established consisting of the branches Legislative, Executive and Judiciary. This type of government was very different than that of the Confederation. The delegates were set very much in their ways that they voted to accept this after only a very little…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The author of the book A Brilliant Solution, Carol Berkin, a successful American historian that was born in 1942 in Alabama and was awarded the Bancroft Dissertation Award, from her college at Columbia University where she was awarded and an M.A. and a Ph.D. He has written many books In her book, she summarizes the key elements in the creation of our current government and constitution. She goes into detail factoring in people's beliefs and views to help generalize an individual's standpoint on an issue. In the book, Ms. Berkin is trying to argue that the creation of the constitution was not an easy process but was very tedious work. The book A Brilliant Solution is divided into many chapters but its best summarized in the parts starting…

    • 1306 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First Short Essay One thing was clear during the convention of 1787, there were an astonishing number of viewpoints that clashed wherever they could. The main topic for debate was the distribution of control. Who would make the decisions for the people the state government or national government? The worry was that if the state government had primary control over the people's interests, who would police them? The Federalists wanted to make sure that the state government officials did not influence political policy to further their own interests.…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The reason why the Articles of Confederation were adopted was because of the states. The states were so independent and they did not want any central authority. But, when it was time to pay war debts then it came the Constitution… For the country to be ran more smoothly there needs to be a change in the people. If we try to change the way people think than the country will run smoother.…

    • 211 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Revolution is over a decade past; it’s 1787, the United States is currently using the Articles of Confederation. The recent events of Shay’s rebellion show us that the Articles of Confederation is inefficient and fails to protect people's natural rights. This raises a concern that the Articles of Confederation should be replaced by the new Constitution. We should ratify the Constitution to better protect people's natural rights. Amos Singletary, a Massachusetts representative, is against the ratification (Doc1).…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Under the Articles of Confederation, the federal government was considered weak because it has no authority over interstate and foreign trade matter. States are free to conduct their own respective business and the federal government has no say to whatever states do. So, with states acting like its own sovereign nation rather than a type of government under the federal government, the relationship between the two government is chaotic. In this paper, I am going to discuss further details about why federal government was considered weak under the Articles of Confederation and the changes that were written into the Constitution of the United States that solves the interrelationship problem between the federal and states under the Articles of…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The first man to ease the fears and concerns of the people was James Madison. He promised that a Bill of Rights would be added to the Constitution as individual amendments if they would, in turn, be ratified. The greatest dissension and opposition towards the Constitution was in New York. In order to counteract the anti-federalists present in New York, James Madison, John Jay, and Alexander Hamilton wrote a conglomeration of essays called “The Federalist Papers”. These essays discussed the positive reforms that the Constitution would make, and how they would better the states as a whole.…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Articles of Confederation were documents that had immense inadequacies to unionize the American colonies when necessary. To publicize the faults of the Articles of Confederation and the assets of the proposed Constitution, the Federalist Papers were constructed by James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and John Jay. In Federalist No. 10, it is noted that the reality of living in an unstable government and the capability of the rise of majority factions worried American citizens. America was deeply vulnerable under the Articles of Confederation and were unable to combat national and international issues because of the lack of central authority.…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1776 the Second Continental Congress began to draft the plans for the government of the new nation that would be formed after the colonies gained their independance. The plan that the congress created is called the Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation created a confederal form of government, consisting of a loose union of 13 states, each with their own governments. However, despite the founder’s good intentions the government formed under the Articles of confederation is considered a failure, because it had minimal powers, did not have a chief executive or national court, and could not effectively raise funds for the national treasury. The biggest fear of the delegates at the Second Continental Congress was government overreach, and tyranny.…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of The New Constitution

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited

    In order to resolve the differences, delegates from the majority of the states met at the Annapolis Convention in 1786. But they were not able to reach any agreeable conclusion. That led them to decide to meet again later in Philadelphia. In second convention, delegates observed that there is urgent need to frame an entirely new constitution. A key issue of conflict was the structure of the new legislative branch.…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Articles of Confederation marked the death of the 13 Colonies and the birth of the United States of America, a country of it’s own after fighting with a superpower for so long. After being controlled and constrained by Britain for centuries, the now-Americans were afraid of the government becoming a second Britain. The new American government drafted the Articles of Confederation in 1777, the first law of their new country, and to avoid creating another restrictive government, the Articles were extremely limited federally and failed to provide a strong government in terms of economics, law enforcement, and government. These issues can be shown by just a few of the restraints on the federal government: the inability to print national currency,…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Separation of Powers / Checks and Balances It was a new beginning. So much was at stake when the Founding Fathers came to this country to start anew. They had a lot of uncertainty, but one thing they all fervently desired was to do it right this time! They hoped to be able to create a new society that was governed, not by a monarchy, but by the people and for the people.…

    • 1346 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fifty Federalists, with the same general idea of creating a stronger central government, all got together to draw up an entirely new charter, the modern day Constitution. Many debates occurred within the forming of this document, mainly revolving around slaves and specifications regarding the executive powers. The two main opposing members regarding the executive powers was Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson. Hamilton wanted a single man to be elected for life for executive power. The main argument against this was if one man was in charge, the government would be far too similar to a monarchy.…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays