Summarize Plans From The Constitutional Convention Summary

Improved Essays
Summarize Plans from the Constitutional Convention

In the reference of “Virginia Plan” by Levy, Leonard W (2000), it states that the central government was no longer able to stand against the state encroachments under the Article of Confederation. In order to solve this problem, at the Constitutional Convention of 1787, Virginia Plan, draft by James Madison, was established to centralize the power of the government and bicameral Congress, one house elected by the people, and the other one was by the first house, to be nominated based on population of a state or its financial statue. This plan enhanced the power of the legislature of the government which prevented the state legislation from contradicting the national harmony. On the other hand, state laws could be vetoed by the Congress with the agreement of the Executive and Judicial. The Virginia Plan weakened this state powers and empower the Congress, maintaining the harmony of the nation and push the political system to upper level.
In the paper of “New Jersey Plan” by Levy, Leonard W, William
…show more content…
Brain describes that because of the growth of the population of some small states. It was written by the Connecticut Delegate Roger Sherman, who suggested that each state should have different size of the House of Representatives based on its population, and should represent equally in the Senate regardless of its population. It also influenced the thought of James Madison who wrote the Virginia Plan. He created a role called federal judges who is nominated by the president to modify the judicial system. The Great Compromise is a composition of the Virginia Plan and New Jersey Plan building the current legislature of the United States with two houses, one based on population and elected by the people and the other house allowing two senators per

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    There are 3 main plans to replace the articles of confederation the Virginia Plan, New Jersey Plan, and the Connecticut Compromise. The first plan is the Virginia Plan this plan was introduced by Edmund Randolph and helped the bigger states. It had 3 branches the Executive, Legislative, and Judicial but it centred around the Legislative branch. It had a lower and upper house. The lower house was picked by popular vote and the upper house was picked by a list of people who were nominated by the states.…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He would represent Virginia and would inform the committee of his government plan he had to offer. He proposed a government system that consisted of three branches of government. This system was called the Virginia plan and had a legislative, executive, and judicial branch of government. Some states did not like Randolph’s proposal and declined the offer. However, Randolph was determined to get his plan to be a working system in the future for the United States.…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    James Madison, an American statesman and a political theorist, wrote the Virginia Plan in 1787. The Virginia plan called for a strong central government with three branches known as executive, legislative, and judicial. The Virginia plan also called for a bicameral (two branches) congress. The bicameral Congress would have two houses (an upper and a lower house) and the two would meet separately and would have to agree upon a bill before it became a law.…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Convention Dbq

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages

    6) After deciding on the rules that would govern the proceedings, delegates prepared to hear proposals on the critical issue that led to the convention: amending and improving the Articles of Confederation. They ended up writing the constitution. Therefore it exceeded its authority. 7) Would the United States have been better off if the Virginia Plan had been adopted as presented? a) States with a large population, like Virginia (which was the most populous state at the time), would thus have more representatives than smaller states.…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ms. Berkin also noted that George Washington was seen as a hero and a nationalist by the people, so he was very well liked. This contributed to the election of George Washington, as the president of the convention. James Madison, one of our founding father and who later serve as our 4th president, rafted a new form of government; That was presented by Governor Edmund Randolph, and named the Virginia Plan. It called for a strong central government, with legislative branches that had the right to tax. They were trying to create a government that would have the power to control trade, regulate commerce and the economy, and protect its citizens from harm.…

    • 1306 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The New Jersey Plan suggested that the principle “one state, one vote” from the Articles of the Confederation remained. It also stated that Congress would be able to require taxes and regulate trade and that everything Congress did, would be considered supreme law of the land. In addition, it required an executive office made up of people that were elected by Congress and a Supreme Court appointed by the executive office. Roger…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The New Jersey Plan Essay

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages

    What type of representation did the Virginia Plan call for? The type of representation the Virginia call for is the “proportional representation” where states that have larger population will have more representative than the states that have smaller population. It means that states with more number of people would have more to say in the politics and would receive more representatives. 3) How was the Virginia Plan connected to slavery?…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First Short Essay One thing was clear during the convention of 1787, there were an astonishing number of viewpoints that clashed wherever they could. The main topic for debate was the distribution of control. Who would make the decisions for the people the state government or national government? The worry was that if the state government had primary control over the people's interests, who would police them? The Federalists wanted to make sure that the state government officials did not influence political policy to further their own interests.…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John P. Roche gives his case that proposes that the form of the Constitution was simply a representative development involving a compromise of the interests of the state, economy, and governmental concentrations. In John P. Roche’s argument he states that the government was as democratic as possible: “My concern is with the further position that not only were they revolutionaries, but also they were democrats. Indeed, in my view, there is one fundamental truth about the Founding Fathers…: They were first and foremost superb democratic politicians…”[1]. He continues by stating that what they did was create a practical compromise that would support both the national interest and be something that the people would agree with. They started with the Virginia plan that proposed a bicameral legislative branch.…

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of The New Constitution

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited

    Small states were in favour of New Jersey Plan, under which all states would have equal representation in the legislature. On the other hand, large states advocate the Virginia Plan to form a Bicameral (two-house) legislature in which representatives would be appointed according to population. The Great Compromise between the states gave rise to a bicameral Congress in which states were given equal representation in the Senate and proportional representation in the House of Representatives. Roger Sherman played a decisive role in success of Philadelphia Convention. He is remembered as the architect of the Connecticut Compromise.…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    At the Philadelphia Convention, the federalist constitution was opposed by some representatives of the state because they felt it limited the power of the states. They believed that it gave too much power to the central government. Some arguments that were made for in favor of the federalist constitution was that a central government would better protect the rights of the American people. The Supremacy clause stated “that the national government's authority prevails over any conflicting state or local government’s claims” (Morone & Kersh 118) was self evident in proving the fact that the central government, although permitting states reserved powers, would have more power than the states. The changes from Dual Federalism to New Federalism…

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Dear J. Madison, I have the utmost respect for you, but something has been puzzling me lately, I simply cannot comprehend why you oppose the Connecticut Compromise so deeply. I despise that we are in an argument about the ways our government should work. The Constitution would not have been as grand as it is if not for you, however your Virginia Plan does not represent smaller states, such as my home in Connecticut, New Jersey, and many other states are in agreement. My idea is a compromise, which involves each state, it includes bicameral legislature, with one part proportional representation and the other half involving each state having one representative. I know you are a busy man, but I hope that you will consider voting for the good of…

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During that convention, Madison created The Virginia Plan, which “ advocated a strong central government and served as a working model for the new U.S. Constitution” (James Madison). The Virginia Plan served as a way of settling the disagreements between the northern and southern states over the legislature. The plan called for two bodies of the legislature the House and the Senate. The house would have members based on the population of a state and the Senate would have two members in each state. James Madison was fundamental in ratifying the Constitution with the Federalist Papers.…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    State power was exemplified through its organization of congress, where each state had one vote and 9/13 states had to support a law in order for it to be passed. Furthermore, the national government didn’t have an executive or judicial organization. Thus congress lacked the power to tax, regulate trade, or control coinage. With the period of discontent, economic crisis and collapse of Revolutionary expectations that came from the Articles, there was a proposition for redirecting this crumbling…

    • 1927 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They had made the wise decision to design a ultimately new political executive. In order to do this they invented the great American Constitution. Besides explaining the role of the American Constitution this book additionally mentions James Madison, the Virginian delegate and describes him. Even though the convention consisted of an abundant quantity of people, and it is essential to understand each and every one of them the reader can become confused trying to keep up with so many personal descriptions. As the reader is confused Madison’s thoughts gives a secure feeling to reduce the overwhelming information.…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays