Crofts Vs Governor Of Texas Case Study

Superior Essays
Citation: Croft vs. Governor of Texas, 562 F.3d 735 (5th Cir. 2009).

Parties: David W. and Shannon K. Croft: Parents of minor Children - Plaintiffs / Appellants Governor of the State of Texas, Rick Perry - Defendant / Appellee

Facts: In 2006, David and Shannon Croft, parents and friends of three minor children, filed a suit alleging the Texas Pledge and Minute of Silence Statute was unconstitutional. Each morning, Texas public school students are mandated to pledge allegiance to the United States and Texas state flag and observe a minute of silence. The Crofts sued Governor Rick Perry on behalf of their children who attended the Carrolton-Farmers Branch Independent School District. The Crofts argue the 2003 amended statute
…show more content…
The U. S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas granted summary judgment for Governor Perry. The Plaintiffs …show more content…
Croft vs. Governor of Texas, 562 F.3d 735 (5th Cir. 2009). Unless a student receives a written excuse by a parent/guardian, each student is required to recite the pledge of Allegiance to the U. S. and Texas state flags and observe a minute of silence. § 25.082.
The Crofts argued the State of Texas School Day; Pledges of Allegiance; Minute of Silence Statute is a direct violation of the First Amendment 's Establishment Clause. 562 at F.3d 735. The Supreme Court has determined the Lemon test, which is a three-part test to determine when a federal or state law violates the Establishment Clause and concluded for a law to comply with the Establishment Clause, it must (1) have a secular purpose; (2) have a predominantly secular effect; and (3) not foster “excessive entanglement” between government and religion. Lemon vs. Kurtzman, 403 U.S. 602

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Case: Ewing v. California, 583 U.S. 11 (2003) — Facts: George Ewing walked into a pro shop of a Los Angeles County golf course where he concealed and stole three golf clubs priced at $399 a piece. Aside from this incident, Ewing had several prior convictions, four of which were serious, violent, and/or felonious. In this case, Ewing was convicted of felony grand theft and sentenced to 25 years to life under California’s three-strike law. Procedural History: the California Court of Appeal and the Second Appellate District affirmed the trial court’s ruling. The State Supreme Court denied review, and the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari, as well as upheld the decisions of the lower courts.…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Moore Vs Texas Case Study

    • 265 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Moore sought state habeas corpus relief and argued that the decision made by the Supreme Court in the Atkins v. Virginia case should apply to his case. Moore was claiming that he was intellectually disabled and should be exempt from execution. Based on the Atkins argument the habeas court granted relief to Moore. However the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas said that Moore…

    • 265 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    CITATION Engel v. Vitale, 370 U.S. 421 (1962) FACT The Board of Regents for the State of New York authorized a short non-denominational prayer, along with the Pledge of Allegiance, to open the school day. Students were told the prayer was voluntary. Steven Engle, a Jewish student and his parents sued, alleging the law violated the Establishment of Religion Clause of the First Amendment.…

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Texas police were dispatched to Lawrence's apartment complex in response to a reported weapons disturbance. Houston police entered Lawrence's apartment and saw him and another man, Garner, engaging in a consensual sexual act. The case began with the arrest of a Houston resident, John Lawrence. Lawrence and Garner were detained and held in police custody overnight. Both men were charged with violating the Texas "Homosexual Conduct" law.…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In 2003, the court case Lawrence v. Texas, the Supreme Court ruled that state laws banning homosexual sodomy are unconstitutional as a violation of the right to privacy. The case began with the arrest of a man named John Geddes Lawrence, a Houston resident of Texas. Cops were dispatched to the apartment for some “weapon disturbance”. Instead of finding what they came for they caught Lawrence in a sexual activity with another a man known as Tyron Garner. They were later charged with violating the Texas “Homosexual Conduct Law”.…

    • 158 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The plaintiff wanted to know whether a law that authorizes a period of silence in public schools for "meditation or voluntary prayer" is a violation of the Establishment Clauses? What the Plaintiff really wants is “To suggest that a moment-of-silence statute that includes the word 'prayer' unconstitutionally endorses religion, while one that simply provides for a moment of silence does not, manifests not neutrality but hostility toward religion." The argument of the…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The ruling, which occurred during the Vietnam War, granted the students the right to express their political opinions as long as they did not disrupt the classroom. Their First and Fourteenth Amendment rights could not be restricted based on a “general fear of disruption,” which is what the administration argued. According to Justice Fortas, who wrote the majority opinion, the protest was a “silent, passive expression of opinion.” Though a few hostile comments had been made to the students who were wearing armbands, there had been no threats or acts of violence. Also, there had not been any findings that the armbands would substantially interfere with school operations or more importantly, harm the rights of other students.…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Texas vs. Johnson (An analysis of the supreme court case Texas vs. Johnson and the current repercussions of the decision) The first amendment protects many of our basic rights such as freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom of the press, etc. The framers of our constitution left a broad wording to leave room for our country to grow and change as time went on. One of the adjustments our country has made over time is to define the actions and words protected under the freedom of speech. There are three basic categories of free speech; pure speech, is communication only through words, speech plus is speech plus an aid such as a sign or a chant, and symbolic speech, an action that communicates meaning without the use of words.…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The father of this child did more to violate his sons first amendment rights than the school did. At least the school made it optional to participate in the recitation of this prayer everyday. The father basically told his son I don’t want you reciting that prayer because it goes against my religion. Then he decided to sue someone because the recitation of this prayer is contrary to his religion and what he believes, and his child also. Since when does a parent ever have the right to choose what their child does/doesn’t believe…

    • 1944 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Engel Vs Vitale Analysis

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages

    It was meant to teach good character and citizenship in the students. The ruling did prohibit schools from writing or reciting a specific prayer and requiring all students to say it. The majority stated that allowing students to absent themselves from this activity did not make the law constitutional because the purpose of the First Amendment was to prevent government interference with religion. The issue before the court was on the establishment Claus of the first amendment of the federal law, which was also included in the fourteenth amendment of the New York state constitution and violation of separation between…

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Texas Unjust Advantages

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The first amendment clearly states that the US government shall not hold higher, or provide an unjust advantage to any religion over another, while the Freedom of Worship clause much more crealy states that the residents of Texas have cannot have their freedom to practice their religion in whole taken from them. The first amendment was made to prevent the government from adopting a certain religion over others, while the freedom of worship amendment was made to protect religious practices and worship. 2. The Texas and US constitutions do not necessarily collide here. The US constitution makes it clear that the government shall not hold higher, nor provide an unjust advantage to any religion over another.…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Savitri Bhama

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Plaintiff Savitri Bhama and defendant Rajendra Bhama were married until they got a divorce in 1977, they both are psychiatrists. While married they had two kids together. After the divorce custody of both kids was given to Savitri. Which led to a custody battle between the defendant and the plaintiff. In 1981, custody of both children was given to the defendant.…

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Texas Governor

    • 878 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Though the position of governor is usually regarded as the most powerful executive position a state can have, a debate has risen between the gubernatorial authority of Texas’s governor and lieutenant governor. This can be attributed to the strict nature of the Texas Constitution of 1876 as a reaction to Reconstruction and the overpowering era of Edmund J. Davis as a governor. Consequently, the governor’s formal powers have been restricted, and relative to most other states, the lieutenant governor of Texas has considerably greater power, especially with the legislative branch (Erikson and Wallace, 2010). Currently, the governor has sufficient powers to execute their job, as previous governors have achieved many of their planned goals. However,…

    • 878 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Should free speech be Restricted for Teachers and Students? Teachers and students have a right to freedom of speech. All people have a say in things on what they believe is wrong. Freedom of speech gives people that right to express any opinions without restraint whether it’s about school uniforms, trigger warnings, and posting stuff online about your school. Free speech should not be restricted for teachers and students because one the First Amendment which gives people the right to speak their minds and two people should be honest with themselves.…

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. What were the two main findings in the PARC Case (1971)? The case of Pennsylvania Association for Retarded Children (PARC) v. the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania consists in a sue against a state law which denied access to education to children with disabilities who have not reached the 5 year old mental developmental. The two main findings in this case are the right of students with mental retardation to receive free public education and, as long as possible, include this kind of students in a regular classroom rather than an isolated special class.…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays