Advantages And Disadvantages Of The Judicial Selection Process Of Texas

Great Essays
Each state of the United States of America follows one of the particular judicial selection processes. The typical approaches to the choice of the judges are: partisan and non-partisan regular elections, merit selection and gubernatorial or legislative appointment (Chertoff, 2010). In most states a mix of those approaches is applied to the judicial selection processes within their own court system. This makes every state’s judicial selection process exceptional and unique. While all of those methods have their advantages and disadvantages, and no one of them is perfect, certain approaches to the selection of judges are more preferred than others. This essay is dedicated to the examination of the judicial selection process of the two American states with further explanation of their common and distinctive features in order to define the most efficient selection of judges. The state judicial selection processes for different court systems of Texas and Arizona were studied in this paper.
The Judicial Selection Process of Texas
Since the foundation of the Texas as a state in 1845, the judges of Texans courts were appointed by the governor with the senate consent. But starting from the 1866 all judges were elected by the voting of people. There was a trend of implementing judicial elections in the 19th century
…show more content…
There are two supreme courts in the state - the Texas Supreme Court and the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. The first one has final appellate jurisdiction in civil and juvenile cases while the latter one has final jurisdiction in criminal cases (Jones, 2007). Each court has one chief justice and eight justices. All nine judges of those two supreme courts are chosen through the partisan statewide elections for the term of six years. One-third of the judges are reelected every three years although in the occasion of a vacancy, a judge is chosen on the new elections to complete the unexpired

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    The Federal Court system has three levels: the District Courts, the Courts of Appeal and the Supreme Court. NV judges are elected by the people. In contrast, federal judges are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate. The election of judges in NV creates a conflict of interest with the public in whom they sit in judgment. Judges must raise money in order to fund their election.…

    • 1229 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Assignment Two: State Court Survey In Arizona, the majority of cities and towns have a municipal court which is sometimes also called city or magistrate court. This court hears misdemeanor and petty offense violations within their town or city. City or town magistrates preside over some criminal and civil traffic cases. Criminal traffic cases with no serious injuries and civil traffic cases that involve violations of city ordinances. They have the ability to issue Orders of Protection and search warrants.…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1998, Hugh Caperton filed a lawsuit against A.T. Massey Coal Co., Inc and was found liable for $50 million in damages in a state trial court in West Virginia. Prior to the hearing, Caperton motioned for the presiding justice in the case, Brent Benjamin, to recuse himself, seeing as though Massey’s C.E.O. had donated nearly $3 million dollars to Benjamin’s campaign. In 2009, the United States Supreme Court ruled that Benjamin’s failure to recuse himself, seeing as he had a personal connection to one of the parties in the case, was a direct violation of the Due Process Clause stated in the fourth teeth amendment (CAPERTON v. A.T. MASSEY COAL CO., INC.). The Caperton v. Massey case proposed the question, “how much power and impact does election campaigning have on judicial bias. Should state judges be appointed over elected?”…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Additionally, in this trial, the implications of an elected versus appointed judge can be seen. Judge Horton did the right thing by overturning the conviction of Haywood Patterson, he did so at great risk. Horton, an elected judge, basically ended his career with this move. It is this situation that leads me to believe that judges should be appointed rather than elected. Not every judge, especially when put in a situation like this, would have the integrity to ignore the political ramifications of their decision.…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    William Wayne Justice, he was a formidable judge that sat on the federal bench in the state of Texas. He brought forth change throughout his years as a judge and some of those changes would be major reform decisions that will change the systems in Texas. He was a judge that made decisions that influenced changes and it was noticed not only in Texas, but throughout the United States. Judge Justice was involved in many controversial cases and reforms that gained attention all over. Not only the cases were controversial, but his decisions were ones that got people talking about him.…

    • 1720 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In between are many administrations like appellant courts, district courts, municipal courts, and many other courts. The majority of judges are elected in a partisan way by Texan citizens and vacancies are filled by appointees by the Governor with the consent from the Texas Senate. Their terms vary from two years to six years. The Judicial branch has the power to judicial review and interpret the law. This branch resolves legal issues about status and addresses disputes arising between a citizen and the state of…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Texas vs. Johnson (An analysis of the supreme court case Texas vs. Johnson and the current repercussions of the decision) The first amendment protects many of our basic rights such as freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom of the press, etc. The framers of our constitution left a broad wording to leave room for our country to grow and change as time went on. One of the adjustments our country has made over time is to define the actions and words protected under the freedom of speech. There are three basic categories of free speech; pure speech, is communication only through words, speech plus is speech plus an aid such as a sign or a chant, and symbolic speech, an action that communicates meaning without the use of words.…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Judges, in Texas are elected in partisan elections for 4 year terms, and appeals court judges are elected for 6 year terms. If a position become vacant the Governor may fill the vacancy by appointing a replacement until the next…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jeffrey Toobin Essay

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Throughout the nonfiction book by Jeffrey Toobin, he talks about the justice system and the Supreme Court in the United States and how it functions and also how it has changed over the years in history. The book shows a great look at how individuals such as George W. Bush in how they hold their power and how the justice system affects that. Also giving a great understanding with Justice Sandra Day O'Connor's alienation. It also touches on the topic of a “fight” of conservatives that were taking control or trying to take control of the supreme court. Despite that there were many more republican appointees on the court it fails in the 80s and 90s.…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The power is divided among statewide elected officials of other states (Braden: 1977). These and other factors stress the need to rewrite the Texas Constitution. This leads the executive branch members to enviously protect their jurisdiction and power and undermines the group effort to govern Texas. PART II:…

    • 1023 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Models Of Judicial Decision-Making. n.p.: Macmillan Reference USA, 2008. Gale Virtual Reference Library. Web.…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The voters should realize that the judge has to make impartial decisions and serve the whole society and not those affiliated to one party. Every citizen should get some information about the…

    • 1198 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The forty-nine Circuit Court judges are elected by the General Assembly to staggered terms of six…

    • 1210 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    First, a judge has to be nominated by the President (stated in Article II Section 2 in the U.S. Constitution) Obama can replace whomever he wants to (filling in for Justice Scalia) Once the President has nominated a judge, the Senate Judiciary Committee needs to confirm and the President needs to appoint the new judge. Secondly, the Judiciary Committee has a three step process as to confirming a supreme court judge. Firstly, the Committee does an investigation into the judge’s background. Next, the Committee will hold a public hearing in which the judge is questioned and gives testimonies about everything from his or her judicial philosophy to his or her stand on abortion.…

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Throughout our history, there has been a concurring question, in which the burden has weighed heavy the shoulders of many citizens. Should Supreme Court judges be elected or appointed? In the process of this debate, a main concern of the overall argument shadows the question that if today’s method of selection is constitutional and publicly acceptable. In order to keep the public content and still have a reliable court system, there are many factors that are taken into place, which is also one of the reasons why the answer to this question has yet to be justified. In addition, there is an equal amount of supporters on either side who each claim their position is the most ethical and reasonable choice.…

    • 2056 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays