Advantages And Disadvantages Of Chelsia

Secondly, socialist and communist practices mainly govern Chelsia’s economy. Chelsian’s have the economic power in choosing where they want their money being invested in. As a result, healthcare and post-secondary education are free. Parallely to Denmark, Danes and Chelsian’s pay large amounts of taxes to afford these free luxuries. Despite these costly taxes, taxpayers happily pay their fees as taxes are seen as an investment in their future lifestyle. Through allowing citizens to control where their money is being sanctioned, the tax war is essentially eliminated through a consensus agreement. In order to stabilize the economy, Chelsia takes advantage of the positive relations inside the Scandinavian region to establish fair trade agreements. …show more content…
Consequently, Chelsia adopts communist practices where people are given resources accordingly to their needs and abilities. This means that even when people choose what their taxes are funding, a lower class still remains as companies are competing for success in trade agreements; the inevitable loser becomes this lower class. Hence an existing, but narrow economic gap as Chelsia provides the lower class with necessities. However, from a global perspective, Chelisa is virtually a classless society because their trade activity is geographically limited and the nation primarily runs on socialist practices where economic control is given to the citizens. This mix of socialism and communism prove to be effective, as citizens understand the importance in trades for a stable economy. as the primary disadvantage to socialism is a collapsed economy; Greece’s current economic state justifies the detriments of socialism. Through adopting both systems, Chelsia is able to gain the benefits of both doctrines, whilst dodging most of the ramifications following socialism and