Compare Capitalism And Socialism

Improved Essays
Two Hemispheres: A Comparison and Contrast of Capitalism and Socialism
For the last couple centuries, since the Industrial Revolution the world has been experiencing a tremendous wave of changes in the matters of society, economy and political practices. During this time, two major systems emerged as the result and/or perhaps as a response to the many challenges and opportunities brought by Industrial Revolution. The two hemispheres of power, capitalism and socialism are the two most influential systems that throughout modern history have had an impact the social structures, economic methods and political position of many nations. The importance of analyzing the similarities and differences between both systems present an insight to how
…show more content…
The dictionary of economics (Black, 2012) defines capitalism as “the economic system based on private ownership of property and private enterprise. Under this system all, or a major proportion, of economic activity is undertaken by private profit-seeking individuals or organizations, and land and other material means of production are largely privately owned”, to expand of the definition, capitalism is the lines with the laissez-faire economic view which argued that the government shouldn’t intervene in business practices except to protect private property. The timeline for modern capitalism starts with merchant capitalism from the 16th century with naval trade mainly from Great Britain and the Netherlands. Later on during the Industrial Revolution, political philosophers inspired by the analysis develop innovative ideas about how the power that resulted from wealth created by industrialization and commerce and their socio-economic impact. In his book An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations Scottish economist Adam Smith, considered the father of capitalism, described capitalism as a free market system that strongly relies on the regulation of the supply and demand by a price mechanism (Smith, 2012).The free market is separated from the government and individuals have the freedom to pursue …show more content…
This main contrast sets a myriad of opposite postures that have a socio-economic and political impact. For example, the capitalist system base individual prosperity on free market with a small government and the opposite, considers government controlled industries as a mean to social prosperity. While in capitalism companies are owned by the private sector; in socialism the government owns the companies. Individual freedom to property, competition and assets management contrasted by elimination of private property and government welfare programs that provide same social benefits. Capitalism can cause huge distance between the classes which can result in social uneasiness, while Socialism systems attempts to assure social equality. In the matter of technology both systems share the interest in scientific and technological developments, but differ in the methods. While in capitalism, the classic laissez-faire allows the private sector to develop technology and encourage entrepreneurship that consequently allow creative destruction, while in socialism the government agencies would be exclusively behind every project. The highest representation of the opposition between the two systems, was the during the Cold War, when two powerful nations, The United States representing capitalism and the U.S.S.R representing a form of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Furthermore, Mill is willing to admit that capitalism can at times depress wages, but he qualifies that remark by espousing that all wage declines mirror market fluctuations but competition will eventually revamp workers’ wages (Mill 249, 256). A large portion of Mills’ argument for private property is constructed when contrasting capitalism to the schematics of communist property. Mill asserts numerous facets that he defines as lacking in communism. First of all, managers of private property have motive, incentive, and a large stake in producing as efficiently as possible (Mill 262-263). Additionally, Mill notes that a transformation to altruistic form of shared property would be a challenging endeavor to establish universal conformity to a new economy, and that transformation in…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Liberal-pluralism has a tendency to focus on citizen as consumer, as this, as the paradigm suggests is where power really lies. Consumers can select and reject certain content or products thereby facilitating supply and demand/the invisible hand and controlling what is produced through this power. Marxism more strongly suggest a kind of naivety of the proletariat and their lack of agency under bourgeois rule. Regarding media more broadly, liberal-pluralism suggests media are independent and unaffected by external forces and do their utmost to depict fair, balanced content. Marxism suggest that media produced socially manufactured messages, that uphold and can not escape the biases of the bourgeoisie in capitalist systems.While liberal-pluralism challenges many Marxist ideas, both are focused on understanding capitalist societies.…

    • 1978 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Whilst communism and capitalism are the economic systems in one point, the main difference is the control of production instruments; whether to have collective ownership or private property. In capitalism, owning the instruments of production is free, but it is also very difficult to maintain this ownership because of the constraints to generate revenue in the perfect competition. Whereas production instruments are shared equally in the communist system, so each individual has the right to use common goods and services. Of course, it is not clear the level of sharing equally. Briefly, communism calls for an economic order of sharing the ownership.…

    • 1380 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This is seen through a variety of examples, such as, big corporations supporting cheap labour. Liberalism and Marxism support internationalism, and not nationalism. Marxism supports an international 'dictatorship of the proletariat' (Fisheaters.com, 2015), while Liberalism supports an international economy, in which the one and only value that matters, is how much profit you can make. Liberalism and Marxism have similar beliefs and values in a standard Family household. Karl Marx, in The German Ideology states that patriarchal men see their Wives and Children first as property to be exploited.…

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Merriam-Webster defines capitalism as “an economic system characterized by private or corporate ownership of capital goods, by investments that are determined by private decision, and by prices, production, and the distribution of goods that are determined mainly by competition in a free market”. Karl Marx was a socialist, born in Prussia in 1818. He is considered by many to be the father of modern day communism. Marx and his followers were very critical of capitalism for three main reasons. This essay will distinguish and evaluate the three Marxist critiques of capitalism.…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The neoliberalism is a political ideology which promotes a free market society and free market competition for labour and production. Neoliberalism is an ideology which is centre in exploiting labour and nature. (Kovel, 2007, p. 73). This form of thought renders democracy useless, where it takes away the rights and freedom that are initially given to the person by democracy. The rights and freedom are violated where the government no longer becomes the arbitrary ruler over the people but different multi-billion dollar corporation start controlling their lives through labour.…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Created by ideas that reflected the awareness of the early industrial revolution in the UK and later on Europe. Marxists believe that societies experience struggle due to inequalities like wealth, value and power. Marxism contains different views but have common policies which include. Production is to produce great benefits for a minority at the expense of the exploited majority who are the poorer class. Meaning that it exploits the labour of its employees by paying them wages lesser value than the selling value of the item.…

    • 2182 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Occupy Wall Street movement can be analyzed through the lens of Karl Marx and David Harvey. Harvey critiques the idea of self-regulating markets, or neoliberalism, because not everyone has an equal opportunity in the market and without any state intervention it becomes unfair to those stuck at the bottom. Marx writes about the class struggles between the proletariat and the bourgeois. The bourgeois have purchased the labor of the proletariat at a minimal price and therefore have alienated the proletariat from their own work, but they have also given the proletariat the knowledge of how to work the means of production, so Marx predicted a social revolution would happen where the proletariat will gain power. Well, that did not happen, but…

    • 2077 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay for Week 5 Adam Smith, Karl Marx and Lenin were influential figures and economic thinkers whose ideas have affected the world’s economy for many generations and in many ways. They all had expressed their analysis and theories of Capitalism in their past works. However, the dynamics of capitalism in their theories change; and their views on whether capitalism is optimal or not also differ. The next paragraphs will examine how each thinker evaluates capitalism, their reasons and influences on modern economic thinking. Adam Smith is considered “the father of capitalism” who theorizes about the nature of Capitalism in his renowned work “The Wealth of Nations”.…

    • 1531 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (Marx, 1867) Ironically, while capitalism flourished, the conditions of the Proletariats deteriorated (Boyer, 1998). This became what Marx and Engels called the “base/superstructure” model. For them, the foundation of society was its economy while “culture and ideology are constructed to help secure the dominance of ruling social groups” (Kellner, 2005). Marx believed that the feudal society of Capitalism caused the rigid stability of human existence. As he puts it succinctly: “Men make their own history, but they do not make it as they please; they do not make it under self-selected circumstances, but under circumstances existing already, given and transmitted from the past” (1852).…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics