Absurdism In The Stranger By Albert Camus

Improved Essays
Albert Camus contributed to a kind of writing consisting of Absurdism. In the book, The stranger, he used characters to demonstrate the absurdness in multiple ways. Albert Camus demonstrated how people who live by the rules of Christianity feel threatened by Meursault, the main character, because he doesn’t conform, in other words, he’s awkward. Meursault excludes himself from emotion in multiple events in the book, while most of the people noticed that he had minimal to no emotion at all. Meursault is an indifferent person who doesn’t care whether he is married or not, with or without a job, in love or even hated by Christians. Since Meursault is so emotionless, he is constantly asking questions involving things that had just happened in his …show more content…
In the beginning, he uses death showing his mother’s (Maman) death. “Maman died today. Or yesterday. I don’t know.” Then he uses decaying and death in Salamano’s love for his dog before and after he disappeared. “The two have been inseparable for eight years. The spaniel has skin disease-mange, I think-which makes almost all his hair fall out and leave it covered with brown sores and scabs.” along with “the people who had worked there told him that maybe he had been run over”. Then lastly Albert used the metaphor for when Meursault was taken to court and sentenced to life. “ ‘And do you really live with the thought that when you die, you die and nothing remains?’ ‘Yes’ I said.“ Meursault didn’t care for the fact that he was going to die in a cell alone and didn’t want anyone changing that because he did what he did, which shoot an Arab in cold blood, and now he was sentenced for life for it. Christians think that when you experience such things and take responsibility for such actions, you should be in deep feeling and grief, but since Meursault see’s life as painless as he does, he doesn’t feel what the Christians think is right for people to …show more content…
“ ‘Do you know what this is?’ I said ‘Yes, of course,’ speaking very quietly and passionately, He told me that he believed in God, that it was his conviction that no man was so guilty that God would not forgive him.” The crucifix symbolizes Christianity, opposite from Meursault and initially Albert Camus view. Meursault bases his life on, whatever happens, happens, which is what absurdism is. The idea that life is hopeless. In these terms, Society is opposite from absurdism. Society, including the religious side, see that there is a purpose for the people in the world and that life shouldn’t be taken as a joke in such way that Meursault does on a daily. The chaplain that presents the crucifix to Meursault did so because he didn’t need Meursault to give into Christianity, but to accept god and his ability to do so much. Albert Camus used the crucifix as a symbol along with the courtroom as well. The courtroom is known to be where the law is basically the people. These people, including the Christian’s, had the chance to speak and asks why and how Meursault did what he did and for what reasons. The jury completely notices everyone’s and takes it into consideration multiple times until Meursault was finally sentenced to

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Why is the play so amusing? What is Moliere’s secret, that has allowed him to delight readers for centuries? And finally, what is it about the cultural context in which the play was written and initially performed that makes it, as claimed at the outset of the paper, a critique of supercilious elements of society. The play seems to be amusing primarily in its extreme absurdity, especially the absurdity of Tartuffe’s speeches, both before and after he is found out.…

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the stranger, Camus argues the futility of social conformity, both sides leading to the same verdict: death, one by exile of one’s self, the other by the suicide of one’s beliefs. Camus uses and interesting scene, Meursault’s trial, to show how avoiding conformity leads to shunning by society. The trial portrays the contrast between the morals of society and Meursault’s evident lack of them, and society’s fear of a world without meaning and those who support such a prospect.…

    • 80 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Monsieur Meursault compares the chaplain to a dead man since he refuses to accept his view of life and afterlife. The chaplain is not enjoying his life or living it to the fullest, because he puts a huge emphasis on waiting for the afterlife. Additionally, he compares him to dead because he believes that the chaplain is believing in something that isn’t worth believing in. Monsieur Meursault does not truly appreciate the value of women as individuals. He sees them as a collective group, in life for his enjoyment.…

    • 188 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He claims that his mother chose Larquais as a “sacrificial victim,” (Daoud 111) and that he killed Larquais purely because he, “had to counterbalance the absurdity of our situation,” (Daoud 122). This weak justification, of taking a French settler’s life over twenty years after Musa’s death, further separates the two narrators. Meursault, whilst harboring similar tensions in regards to his mother, makes no real attempt to justify his crime to himself, choosing instead to retreat into his own memories for the sake of entertainment. Their individual manners of coping highlight a significant difference in the two…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Religion, Meursault’s differing morals, and an abhorrent jury not only influenced his trial, but killed Meursault. Meursault’s trial was too focused on his reaction after his mother’s death. The prosecutor treated his actions after his mother’s death like evidence. He said “Gentlemen of the jury, the day after his mother’s death, this man was out swimming, starting up a dubious liaison, and going to the movies, a comedy, for a laugh” (Camus 94).…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The instant sight of the gun in Meursault’s hand causes his surroundings to mute, including “the double silence of the flute” (56). The Arab stopped playing his flute at the sight of the gun, and everything around them goes silent too. The effect that the gun has on Meursault’s surroundings allows Meursault to realize that he can make the choice of using the gun or not. In other words, Meursault is embracing the idea of existentialism through the tension of the…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Albert Camus addresses the steps one should take when dealing with the notion of absurdity in order to make the choice to live without appeal. In the Myth of Sisyphus, Camus defines the clash between the irrational world and humans seeking for rational answers as absurdity. He then outlines the best solution for acknowledging the lack of meaning in life while not turning to suicide. There are many parallels to his reasoning in The Plague, where he uses the threat of sickness in a quarantined environment to showcase the different reactions humans have to an overwhelming loss of hope. In his novel, the town of Oran is forced to wake up from their habits and confront their reality.…

    • 2033 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This description emphasizes the idea that Meursault is taking into account the heat and sun during all of the events. When Meursault leaves, he says “But the whole beach, throbbing in the sun, was pressing on my back.” this is significant because it shows how the sun appears to be as a factor that caused him to head back to the creek to meet the Arab. “ the arab drew his knife and held it up to me in the sun. the light shot off the steel and it was like a long flashing blade cutting at my forehead” (59).Meursault meets the Arab and gets provoked by the heat and the sun being reflected into his eyes off the Arab’s knife and ends up shooting him 5 times.…

    • 1321 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Albert Camus was a critically acclaimed author, born in the early 1900’s. He won a Nobel Prize in 1957 for his work in literature. Camus is most known for his Novel The Stranger, which consists of two parts. The first part of the novel is about a young man named Meursault who lived in French Algeria years after the French Invasion occurred in 1830-1847, and later ending up in prison because he committed murder. While the second part of the novel follows Meursault during his trial and where his fate lies ahead.…

    • 1453 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Meursault’s society uses morality as a way to establish structure in a world that is, according to existentialists, fundamentally irrational. Humans, being mortal and having limited understanding, cannot help but make sense of their world through what they know: boundaries. Civilization has shown that humans have a propensity to change their surroundings to a more favorable, comprehendible environment, and they do so partly by instituting rules. These rules provide a framework for people to fall into and constitute what we consider conventional morality – actions and thoughts deemed socially acceptable, limits on what people should and should not do. Meursault’s society tries to make sense of his seemingly unexplainable murder by fixating on…

    • 1863 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dickens states the guillotine, “superseded the cross, models of it were worn on the breast from which the cross was discarded” (284). The author explains the multitude who once believed in the power of love and forgiveness through the cross, traded their beliefs for hatred and vengeance with the guillotine. Secularism became the new religion of France, with the guillotine as their deadly messiah. This intolerant savior held service at the new Temple of Reason, overseeing retribution on its congregation. Veneration of this entity concentrated on liberty and equality, the liberty of hatred and the equality that death bestows.…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Tarrou combats the plague by searching for a path to his self-proclaimed sainthood. Father Paneloux combats the plague by accepting it as an ultimate test of faith given to the townspeople by providence. By depicting the plight of different characters in combatting the plague, Camus defines the Absurd as an inevitable reality of the human condition and describes the importance of finding one’s own meaning in the face of an indifferent…

    • 1487 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Existentialism is a philosophy that the choices individual makes should be responsible for it and should accept their own act without consent of other people. Its beliefs are centred on the idea of finding the meaning of life through different choices and situations. In the view of existentialist, this world is meaningless and absurd. It is the way that let external factor affect us that determine who we are. As individuals we have freedom to make our own choices and that’s what life's all about.…

    • 1230 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    At this point, Raymond is wanting to know what Meursault thinks of his actions. He cares about Meursault 's opinions and wants to know how Meursault would have handled the situation. He cares about how other people see and respond to his actions. Meursault, on the other hand, does not seem to care at all about what society thinks of him. This is mostly because of his laid back style of life where he really only cares about himself.…

    • 1553 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    During his trial his nonchalant behavior after Maman’s death becomes the courts main focus and the basis determination of whether he is guilty or innocent. By using Fletcher I will explore the context of the idea of being guilty and by using Foucault I will explain the idea following the act of punishment. The way Meursault intermingles with society and who he interacts with is the reason behind the court’s guilty verdict. According to the jury, Meursault appeared guilty because he is a person that is detached from his emotions and the prosecutor made a compelling case by linking him to his friend’s (Raymond) crime.…

    • 1490 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays