Poor Richard's Almanack Analysis

Improved Essays
Apprenticed to his brother, a Boston printer, a young Benjamin Franklin was writing for his brother’s newspaper. He never got anything published under his name, and he would often compare his writings to those of other published writers. Benjamin wrote a submission and slipped it under the door. Finally, his submission was published in The New England Courant under the name of Silence Dogood, a minister’s widow. Under the pseudonym he wrote satirical comments about the Boston society, politics, and religion. Silence Dogood was not very fond of Harvard. She believed that kids being sent there were only learning how to become conceited(Dogood). He wrote 14 letters under the name of Silence, but when he stopped writing his brother wanted to know …show more content…
When Ben revealed that he was Dogood, his brother was furious. His brother made sure Franklin would not be able to get hired at another printing press in town, so Franklin left his apprenticeship, and ran off to Philadelphia where he became a thriving printer. Under another pseudonym, Richard Saunders, he published Poor Richard’s Almanack. The almanac provides literary influence in many different forms: proverbs, epigrams, rhymes, and aphorisms which was spread out throughout the calendars, weather forecasts, and even astronomical charts(PoorRichard.) He uses Poor Richard to instruct the “common people.” It showed the people how to work hard and save money. Dogood and Poor Richard seem to be autobiographical, and they are based on Franklin’s views. Dogood was a minister’s widow. She loved to observe and judge others faults. She was enemies to vice but friends to virtue. She hated arbitrary government and unlimited power. Poor Richard lived in the country and had advice on how to value hard work and simple …show more content…
It did not matter what someone believed as long as their religion contributed to a better society and made the world a more civilized place. Because of religion many thought that their sins were justified. In the article “A Narrative of the Late Massacres of a Number of Indians” fifty-seven men brutally murdered six Indians in their homes. They did not care if they were senior citizens or a toddler, they were going to get killed. The fourteen remaining Indians were taken to a work house in Lancaster so that they can be safe. Well law and security failed them because the men again assembled despite the law and they barged into the work house and inhumanely murdered them. Franklin explains that the men probably think it is justified because it is nothing less than the word of God(Franklin1764). “With the scriptures in their Hands and Mouths, they can set an naught and express that command, Though shalt do no murder, and justify their wickedness, by the command given Joshua to destroy the Heathen.” Franklin also says, “ We pretend to be Christians(Franklin1764).” The Indians were not enemies, yet the frontier people killed them all. Franklin concluded the article saying “Cowards can handle arms, can strike where they are sure to meet with no return, can wound, mangle, and murder; but it belongs to brave men to spare and to

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    It's not just Winnie in this book. I'm in it too. This book is about me!" At first I thought that it was astonishing that my dad was writing books about Winnie and I, but after I went to boarding school, I began to hate them. I didn't only hate the books, I despised being Christopher Robin and my dad for writing the stories about me.…

    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Benjamin loved books and writing and really took to the trade. One day, Benjamin’s older brother came across an essay on Benjamin’s desk that became his first editorial ever published, secretly written under another name, his brother was unaware that his brother was the actual author. Years later, Benjamin’s brother became incarcerated for disrespecting public officials, which lead Benjamin on his own journey. Benjamin had an interest in learning from failures and creating false identities to speak about issues that affected society to contest the current laws and beliefs of their leaders. For example, Polly Baker, a woman that bared five children out of wedlock faced punishment for her actions.…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Winston’s job is to alter history to the liking of Big Brother through magazines, newspapers and books, which was a job almost identical to Orwell’s when he was a BBC producer, but eventually “Orwell found himself acting as a propagandist to advance the country 's side. He loathed this part of his job and resigned in 1943” (biography.com). Thus, there are many aspects in Winston’s life that ties together with Orwell, showing his struggle in life to unnoticeably oppose Stalin, Hitler, and…

    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Now he is a street sweeper which was not his job of choice the government picked his job for him. In the book he slowly starts to go against the government and breaks the laws. Throughout the course of the text the theme of Dystopian Characteristics has progressed and developed in many ways. In the first chapter of the book Equality and his partner in street sweeping find a grill and under the grill is a staircase Equality decides to go into the tunnel with his partner International. When they go in it looks like a place form the unmentionable times which are the times that are happening now as we speak.…

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to many Christian religions “Though Shalt not Kill” is an absolute command, however, the monster violates this command or law and kills/ is responsible for the death of many characters in Frankenstein. While one could say the reason the monster is alright with killing is because he was never educated in Christian morals, however, “Tabula Rasa” states that we learn moral from our interactions with man, so because the monster is taught to act immorally he sees nothing wrong with killing. The monster experiences that killing is alright after saving a drowning girl he is shot, an act of man trying to kill him. So when the monster kills William, Henry, and Elizabeth he is doing so out of what he had been taught by man. T Goodrich says in his book The Morality of Killing “the common sense morality cannot be summed up in the pristine simplicity of ‘killing is (absolutely) wrong”, but that we have to look at the consequences of killing for example had someone killed Hitler prior to him killing six million jews this would not have been an act of immorality, however, if someone kills a father who brings home the food for the family and that family dies because of this that is an act of immorality (127).…

    • 1028 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During his time under the apprenticeship of his brother, he wrote his own articles and published them under a pen name, which his brother was livid about. Tired of his brother’s dominant behavior, he later ran away to Pennsylvania at the age of seventeen. During his time in Pennsylvania, he published the Pennsylvania gazette which was very popular among the settlers. His articles discussed society’s lack of freedom. Later on in his life, he helped draft the Declaration of Independence.…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When Proctor and Elizabeth have their meeting in the prison, Elizabeth explains what has happened to other prisoners; “Giles is dead… He would not answer aye or nay to his indictment; for if he denied the charge they’d hang him surely, and auction out his property. So he stand mute, and died Christian under the law”(IV.559-568). Giles could have prevented being wrongly killed by just lying and admitting to witchcraft, but by not speaking he retained his land and Christian values. For this, he went on to remain a well-respected figure in Salem. Hypocrisy is shown as this, as Salem went against basic American values, killing Giles before he was proven guilty.…

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Justice has to be served and when Mr. Ewell attempts to cowardly murder the children, he is stopped and killed by Boo Radley, another mockingbird in the novel . Even though Boo did technically break the law and even though it would be a very simple case for Boo to win, Mr. Tate believes Boo did a good deed for the town and covers up for him and states simply “Let the dead bury the dead”, because everyone knows Bob Ewell is responsible for the death of Tom Robinson. He also doesn’t shine light on Boo because knows it would destroy him to go out into public after so many years of seclusion and tells Atticus that “taking one man who’s done you and this town a great service an’ draggin him with his shy ways into the limelight-to me, that’s a sin.” (Lee 370)Scout understands why Mr. Tate did this and tells Atticus when he asks her if she can understand that Mr. Ewell ‘fell’ on his knife she responds with “Yes sir, I understand”, “Well it’d be sort of like shootin’ a mockingbird.” (Lee 370) Daren Felty, a critic of this book agrees with this…

    • 1415 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Franklin had to first fight for his papers to be carried by the post riders, in order to beat out the rival newsletter. Franklin wrote many works, such as Poor Richards Almanack and many more. Benjamin was able to do these things with “having learnt a little to scribble.” On the other hand, Jane’s financial situation was painful. Before Sarah Mecom was born, Edward borrowed money from a leather dresser named David Collson. Edward never paid back Collson so he took Edward to court, where Edward never showed so the case went to Collson.…

    • 1432 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Furthermore, he is a most likely former Christian that talks about Satan and God forming hell. However, he completely creates his own form of hell for the inmate students that they were basically being forced to endure. Even when they said they didn’t want to be part of it anymore, Zimbardo did not remove them immediately and actually sent them back into the experiment to give them a second thought which allowed for more damage/persuasion by the guards. Finally, they set very inadequate limits on what the guards were not allowed to do that basically amounted to no physical abuse. Still, they cross that line a few times especially when they used the fire extinguishers to get the inmates out of their…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics