South African Settlement In Australia Essay

South Africa and Australia are two of the countries that lived Aboriginal and occupied by European settlement. South Africa Aboriginals’ treatment is so different from Australia Aboriginals. Moreover, the role of these settlements and the purpose for these settlements are different, too. However, both South Africa and Australia Aboriginals had conflict with settlements and settlement brought and spread serious disease in both country. Australia was occupied by British hundreds of years ago. The main reason why British occupied Australia is they needed more land. The a growing urban underclass in its city, loss of the American colonies and British wanted to relieve the pressure on its prison, so British occupy Australia and carry thousands of people there. Soon there was filled with Britain convicted, colonial administrators and military police in New South Wales. They brought and spread disease in Australia, smallpox is one of the example. Smallpox spread terribly and decimated a lot of Aboriginals in many place in Australia. Britain settlement did not have …show more content…
However there are many differences between them, too. For examole, the settlements in Australia are convicts, colonial administrators and military police, so their main purpose is increaseing land, but the settlements in South Africa are business company, so their main purpose is earning money. Australian settlements treat Aboriginal as one of British people, they gave them education systems, but South African settlements treated Aboriginals as cheap labors and made laws to forbad them. Australian Aboriginal got human rights peacefully but South African Aboriginal got it violently. Therefore, although there are some similarities, due to these examples, Australian Aboriginals are really different fron South African