Presidential Power in the 21st Century The power of presidents in the United States has expanded in the last 50 years. There has been a shift in the expansion of presidential power that some believe to be too powerful. According to the Constitution, the president is the lead official of the executive branch and the president must make sure laws are faithfully executed. One of the most important powers of the president is as commander-in-chief. While the power to declare war resides with Congress, military strategy and growth is the responsibility of the president. Every president has gone beyond the boundaries of the constitution when they felt they needed too. Only recently has the debate started to get heated about whether or not presidential
…show more content…
President Theodore Roosevelt passed the Square Deal agenda by getting through congress. He had to receive support from the public in order to do so. The plan was to help the average American by combating corporate monopolies and industrial trusts. After WWI, Pearl Harbor and WWII, presidents sought to have more authority to effectively secure the country from future wars. The Supreme Court and Congress both halted the president’s efforts. Future presidents Reagan and Clinton pushed for more executive authority as well while Congress continually strived to manage …show more content…
The debate of presidential power will become more heated because of partisan pressure and global terrorism that has continued to threaten the United States. People opposed to power expansion believe congress and administrators shouldn’t allow the president to cross that authority boundary. Another argument they have is that power within foreign affairs has increased and that needs to change. It becomes difficult to change since the public and congress usually support the president when it comes to issues of foreign affairs. Some don’t see any change in the balance of powers which helps presidents get away with choices that aren’t technically in the constitution. Many citizens have expressed concern over this topic of excessive presidential power for the intended purposes of raising questions of whether or not it should be allowed. The public understanding of executive orders is limited, which lends to the idea of what is considered a legal and appropriate presidential action that abides by the
President Theodore Roosevelt passed the Square Deal agenda by getting through congress. He had to receive support from the public in order to do so. The plan was to help the average American by combating corporate monopolies and industrial trusts. After WWI, Pearl Harbor and WWII, presidents sought to have more authority to effectively secure the country from future wars. The Supreme Court and Congress both halted the president’s efforts. Future presidents Reagan and Clinton pushed for more executive authority as well while Congress continually strived to manage …show more content…
The debate of presidential power will become more heated because of partisan pressure and global terrorism that has continued to threaten the United States. People opposed to power expansion believe congress and administrators shouldn’t allow the president to cross that authority boundary. Another argument they have is that power within foreign affairs has increased and that needs to change. It becomes difficult to change since the public and congress usually support the president when it comes to issues of foreign affairs. Some don’t see any change in the balance of powers which helps presidents get away with choices that aren’t technically in the constitution. Many citizens have expressed concern over this topic of excessive presidential power for the intended purposes of raising questions of whether or not it should be allowed. The public understanding of executive orders is limited, which lends to the idea of what is considered a legal and appropriate presidential action that abides by the