Executive Powers Dbq Analysis

Improved Essays
Supreme law, can the president of the United States utilize his/her executive powers in ways that go beyond the bounds of the constitution? Yes, in some cases that show emergencies and or affect the safety and well-being of the citizens of the United States of America, the president should be able to use powers not authorized by the constitution. Present day and history are perfect examples of ways the presidency has handled certain intense issues over the life span of America, these examples will provide a proper understanding of how presidents that have overstepped the bounds of the constitution and helped protect the people and their liberty in the process. History is what people look back on and make sure the same things …show more content…
With president Johnson, he just got into the white house because of the assassination of JFK and was in the middle of talks about the communist regime in Vietnam. In document C, the Joint Resolution, states that " Vietnam, in violation of the principles of the charter of the United Nations and of international law, have deliberately and repeatedly attacked the United States naval vessels lawfully present in international water, and have thereby created a serious threat to international peace". Congress had actually come up with and approved the Joint Resolution with the House of Representatives and gave all the power to do so to president Johnson. In document C, the Joint Resolution states " Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in congress assembled, That the Congress approves and supports the determination of the President, as commander in chief, to take all necessary measures to repel any armed attack against the forces of the United States and to prevent further aggression". This is a recent situation where Congress and the House of Representatives gave all the power necessary to the President to take command of war powers in Vietnam. Then, in 1983, president Ronald Reagan sent a letter to the speaker of the house about the conflict in Grenada. The Prime Minister, Maurice …show more content…
The three different branches all have different powers. In all popular examples of presidents overstepping their powers, they do so in the matter of using their powers for armed forces and war. The problem most of the time is that congress is the only branch that can allow or permit war. When George Bush wanted to wage war on Iraq, congress was all with him. The general plan for this war was to protect Americans from harm after the uncertainty of 9/11. In the 1980s, Ronald Reagan ordered that armed forces go to Grenada to go protect the safety of innocent American citizens before he even told the speaker or congress. When Abraham Lincoln was president during the civil war, Congress was very unstable since half of the members, who were southern, would not even show up and president Lincoln had to take action. Lincoln took action and saved a dying nation in a situation that was a national emergency and was something that had to be done instead of waiting to see what Congress decides. That's the problem that presidents face with waiting for congress. They take forever on decisions and in extreme emergencies they don't meet or react fast enough for anything to even be done. Congress is a very important function in the United States government and serves its purpose. Although,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Analysis Of US V. Curtiss

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Many people tend to wonder the actual power of the president. Is it just a title? Or is he secretly the most powerful man; much like a dictator? Well, by going back in time to specific court cases that could have swayed either way, one can easily tell that the president has more powers than everyone thinks. Many think that issues involving wars and foreign relations are solely powers given to the President, but these powers can be tested when problems occur that are not clearly stated in his job description.…

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    American citizens have always questioned their central government. We were in a war and trying to ratify one of the most important documents to this day, the Constitution. Also, over the years, our nation wrote ment documents, constitutions, papers, and other things that contributed to our central government. During the time of 1754 to 1789, there were a lot of americans who didn't like a strong central government as shown in the the Albany plan, Articles of confederation, and the Anti Federalist.…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Commander-in-ChiefThe President is the final authority in military matters and ultimately is responsible for the entire military might of the United State. Foreign AffairsThe President has the right to conduct diplomatic missions and set foreign policy on behalf of the United States.- Executive Clemency. The President has the power to pardon or commute the sentence of convicted criminals. Emergency Power. The President has the ability to declare a 90 day period of Emergency during which he can use the full force of the military without seeking permission from Congress either in the form of a declaration of war or through funding, Veto.…

    • 5175 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Killer to our Country. Tyranny could take over the country, luckily the constitution guards against it. In May 1787 in Philadelphia 55 men from 11 states were at the constitutional convention to try to frame a government and hold states and people together. Also they wanted to guard against tyranny. Tyranny is when a small group of people get too much power and take over.…

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The War Powers Resolution Act of 1973 is said to have been passed by an “opportunistic” congress who took advantage of public opinion at a time of declining popularity for President Nixon, who was embroiled in the turmoil of the Vietnam War, Watergate, and several other high profile political gaffs (Crook, J., 2012, p. 157). The end result was a piece of legislation intended to further check the executive branch’s power as commander-in-chief to commit US forces to hostilities by granting Congress a greater role in the process. However, with over forty years of various example of executive non-compliance as well as congress’ inability to enforce sections of the resolution, one wonders why the WPRA was ever passed in the first place and why it…

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It can be argued that the president is not in charge of creating legislation, and that the president is to play a role in foreign relations, and that by giving him, the president, the power of the military, that in itself is an argument made by those that support ratification. However, the power to declare war rests in congress and not the president, in which the president is only in charge of the military when war has been declared. The imbalance of power between the three branches of government is a problem that the constitution creates, but that is not the only problem. The other problem that the constitution creates is that the federal government does not provide specific liberties within itself in which the federal government will protect. Those…

    • 915 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the book “We the People”, Lynne Cheney states that, “It's about checks and balance. That’s why congress makes the laws so the President cannot have too much power. It's total unconstitutional!” This displays that executive orders give the president too much power. Ever since the birth of this country, the purpose was to have a system of checks and balances.…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The article from the Atlantic very specifically goes in depth about the ways the powers of the President have expanded past their intended use, with the help of Alexander Hamilton. Hamilton used the first words of the Article, “the executive powers should be vested in the President of the United States of America,” to push through the restraints on the President's power and attempt to create an, “elected monarch,” that would serve for life. His views were way outside the mainstream at the time and this was obviously never put into action. Hamilton also used the overall vagueness of the Article to prescribe powers to the President that were never clearly stated, and to turn the Presidency into something that it was never intended to…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Even the President’s check on Congress, a Presidential veto, can then be reversed by a two thirds majority vote in congress. So while the President does have power, in almost every case, that power is limited in one way or…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Federalist paper 70 The federalist paper 70 is an important document that talks about the welfare of the people of the state of New York based on administration of the laws the government. This paper tries to explore the definition of a good government, for it is important for the protection of property against those irregular practices at that time which sometimes interferes with the normal course of justice; to the security of independency against the enterprises and assaults of goals, of faction, and anarchy. To be specific, the federalist paper 70 is a piece which was written by Alexander Hamilton explaining about the unified executive provided for in the United States Constitution.…

    • 1510 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although I believe that the President should have enough power to control the government at times of emergency, it is still important for the powers to remain under the consent of the Congress. The government is built upon a system of checks and balances so that the "legislative, executive and judicial powers in the American system are divided in such a way that they overlap"; thus, making the President liable to Congress. Also, Having Congressional authorization ensures the President different opinions (in support or in opposition of his view) about the issue at hand that may help him pursue a more logical path of action by providing him several options on how to view the problem. The President is elected by the people for him to represent them and so are the members of the Congress.…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Conflict between the President and Congress Efren Arambula Texas A&M International University The Conflict between the President and Congress Public policy is generally a plan of action adopted by the government to solve a social problem. The American Recovery and Reinvestment and American Jobs Acts was established Franklin Delano Roosevelt; therefore, it was his answer to resolving the Great Depression. Emergency agendas anticipated to influence the financial activity, and it required national and state governments to collaborate (Berry, Goldman, Janda, Manna, and Schildkraut, 2016). The national government proposed money to back up state relieve struggles and states were frequently obligated donate their own money to management and administration (Berry et al, 2016). President Obama was the only thing keeping American together, and we are going to die with the current dictator, 45.…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The power of the Executive Branch is limited through judicial review, which is a process where legislative action must be reviewed by the judicial branch to make sure it conforms with the constitution. Therefore, the president isn’t able to freely make decisions that could hurt the…

    • 1445 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Understanding the relationship between the president and congress is key in understanding American politics. Congress and the president cannot avoid engaging with one another, with a constitutional set up that demands they work together constructively. Congress has its roles to play in policy making as does the president. The president and congress are given certain powers in the constitution, that power is divvied up, so that neither one of these branches has too much power at one time (Fisher 2007). The founders of the constitution were very distrustful of the presidency and feared if the president was given too much power it would lead to demagogy (Dickinson 2008).…

    • 1004 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This might the most important power they posses. This would put thousands of lives, and millions of dollars in danger if one branch of government deemed it necessary. No other branch has this kind of power to affect a countries people, economy, and national relationships. Although the Executive branch can send troops abroad, they can only do it for a one-month period, after that it is up to Congress to decide what occurs next. They keep the Presidents decisions in check.…

    • 1331 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays