• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/15

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

15 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
  • 3rd side (hint)

1. Two ways of dealing with the issue of informed consent.

Obtain Presumptive Consent and Retrospective Consent.

Obtaining informed consent.

1. What's Presumptive Consent?

Asking group of people similar to retrospective participants, if they consent, it's presumed that the actual participants would.

Who is asked to consent?

1. What's Retrospective Consent?

Obtaining consent as soon as the research is done, when the aims have been revealed.

Should be obtained as soon as possible!

1. Why is obtaining informed consent a good thing?

Helps reduce demand characteristics.

Participants still won't know the aims of the study.

2. What does debriefing deal with?

Deception and right to withdraw

Can deal with other ethical issues too, but what are the two main ones?

2. When does debriefing happen and what happens during it?

Once the research has finished; true aims are told, participants asked if they want to discuss any concerns and opportunity to withdraw data.

Aims, Discussion, Withdrawal of data

2. What four criteria must a debrief meet?

Inform the pp's of aims and purpose


Make sure no harm has been encountered


Opportunity to withdraw data


No negative consequences

Ways of dealing with all the ethical issues

3. What is an ethical committee?

A committee which every institution where psychological research takes place has

It doesn't allow for any unethical studies to take place

3. What does an ethical committee do which leads to suggestions on how to deal with issues?

Weighs the benefits of the research against the cost of the participants.

Cost-benefit analysis between what?

4. Who are ethical guidelines produced by?

Professional bodies such as the British Psychological Society or the American Psychological Association.

BPS/APA

4. What do these guidelines do?

Alert psychologists of what behaviour is acceptable and unacceptable, also tells them how to deal with dilemmas

In relation to behaviour and dealing with things

4. What kind of approach does the BPS and APA use and what's wrong with it?

The rules and sanction approach, it is general

The approach is impossible to cover every conceivable situation a psychologist may encounter

4. Why is the Canadian Psychological Association better?

They present a series of hypothetical dilemmas and invite psychologists to discuss them.

This encourages discussion and absolves individual researchers of any responsibility

5. What does the BPS do if a psychologist behaves unethically?

They review the case and ban them from practising.

Affects livelihood and removes their license.

5. What's wrong with punishing psychologists?

It isn't a legal way of dealing with things, so it isn't quite effective.

Effectiveness.