Week 11 Quiz 5

Front 1

Although it is impossible for individuals to reject the moral stage they find themselves in 1-5 and although the higher stages transcend the comprehension of those in the lower stages, Principlism does offer the practical hope of being adopted by those in the lower stages, if properly prsented.

Back 1

TRUE

Front 2

A moral theory only needs to be addressed when there appears to be specification or balancing inconstancies between two or more moral principles and or intuitions.

Back 2

TRUE

Front 3

Contrary to what Kohlberg argued, Bulger believes that principles can be presented in such a way that others in the lower stages can accept them as being part of their own moral point of view.

Back 3

TRUE

Front 4

Even if the aents in Kohlberg's stages 1-5 come up with differing assessments, the fact of using the same principles for moral evaluation will be a great advancement for moral persuasion and compromise in practical reality.

Back 4

TRUE

Front 5

If kohlberg's stages of moral development are descritively true, then it shouldn't be a surprise to find that most researchers and IRB's focus oncodified bureaucratic rules and regulations rather than the universal abstract moral principles found in the Belmont Report.

Back 5

TRUE

Front 6

If the agents in Kohlbergs stages 1-5 do adopt Principlism, then there certainly will still be incommensurable disagreement with reard to beliefs and facts, that will result in differing assessments as to the specification and balancing of these abstract moral principles.

Back 6

TRUE

Front 7

If the agents in Kohlberg's stages 1-5 do adopt Principlism, then there will be no incommensurable disagreements with regard to beliefs and facts

Back 7

False

Front 8

It is possible to present Principlism as part of the worldviews of Kohlberg's stages 1-5, so that they have personal and social ownership of the moral principles.

Back 8

TRUE

Front 9

It might be possible to use a process of "inception" to get individuals in Kohlberg's stages 1-6 to adopt principlism as part of their own moral framework

Back 9

TRUE

Front 10

Kohlberg thought that it was impossible to comprehend moral rasoning more than one stage beyond where an individual currently is.

Back 10

TRUE

Front 11

Kohlberg thought that it was possible to skip stages of moral develpment.

Back 11

False

Front 12

Kohlberg thought that those in the higher stages could understand the reasonin of the lower stages but the lower stages could not understand more than one stage higher than where they were at.

Back 12

TRUE

Front 13

Mid-level principles are often perceived as being "common ground" even within pluralistic societies.

Back 13

TRUE

Front 14

Moral delemma is proof that Principles do in fact conflict with each other.

Back 14

False

Front 15

One of the benefits of Principlism is that there are no moral dilemmas.

Back 15

False

Front 16

Stage six individuals are a very small percentage of the population and therefore they have very little philosophical support.

Back 16

TRUE

Front 17

The Belmont Report is based on Kohlberg's stages of 1-4 whereas 45CFR46 is based on stage 6

Back 17

FALSE

Front 18

THe principles in Principlism are much like Rawls plitical framework in that they are in hierarchical order.

Back 18

False

Front 19

The synergistic Reflective Equilitbrium Model is synergistic because all the parts work together and the experience of the moral agent its that the whole is greater than the sum of its parts.

Back 19

TRUE

Front 20

When a moral decision seems to both promote and not promote two or more moral principles at the same time this is called a moral delema

Back 20

True

Front 21

WIth Principlism, one or more moral principles may outweigh one or more other moral principles.

Back 21

TRUE

Front 22

Match the follwing stages with the approprate "mentality"

Back 22

Stage 1:Might makes Right
Stage 2: What's in it for me
Stage 3: Good ol boy
Stage 4: What if everyone did that
Stage 5: Philosopher King
Stage 6: Moral considerability for all