• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/73

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

73 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Van Den Haag view

Pro Capital punishment

What are the two central issues about Capitol Punishment?

deterrence and justice

Haags response to uneven distribution of the death penalty

the moral status of CP and its distribution are distinct issues

Haags response to miscarriages of justice

as long as the benefits of CP outweigh the costs, then we should keep it

Haags response to the claim that capital punishment encourages unlawful killing

if this is true, then imprisonment encourages kidnapping and fines encourage burgular, which is absurd

Haags response to capitol punishment is too expensive

justice is more important than monetary costs

Haags response to CP violates human rights

it is the murderer doing it to themselves. The idea that there is an inviable right to life, is no more plausible than the possibility that one will forfeit there right to life by murdering someone

Haag commonsense argument

-If punishment 1 is more feared than punishment 2, then punishment 1 will deter more potential criminals than punishment 2


-CP is more feared than life in prison


-Therefore, CP will deter more potential criminals than life in prison

Jeffery Reiman views

Against Capitol punishment

Reiman preliminary claim

it doesn't follow solely from the fact that one deserves some punishment that we ought to administer

Reiman progress in civilization

this is characterized by a lower tolerance for one's own pain and that suffered by others

Reiman's two conditions under which we ought to not reduce the horrible things we do to others

1. it would be unjust to do so


2. It would make our life more dangerous in doing so

Reimans two responses to Haag's common sense argument

1. The 1st premise assumes that less feared punishment doesn't already deter all who could be detered


2. If the commonsense argument succeeds, then it proves too much (i.e. we ought to administer the most feared punishment)

Reimans reason for why execution is horrible

it is analogous to pain and subjugation because it is torture

Reiman's argument against the injustice of refusing to execute murderers

1. progress in civilization requires that we refuse to do horrible things to others unless refusing amounts to an injustice


2. refusing to do horrible things to others does not amount to an injustice, unless the alternative falls short of the bottom end of justice


3. life in prison does not fall short of the bottom end of justice


4. Capitol Punishment is more horrible than life in prison


5. Therefore, refusing to impose capital punishment does not amount to an injustice

Active euthanasia

involves a deliberate action intended to cause the death of a person

Passive euthanasia

involves withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining or life prolonging measures in order to allow for the death of a person

Voluntary euthanasia

with the consent of the dying person

Nonvoluntary euthanasia

without the consent of the dying person

Involuntary euthanasia

against the will of the dying person

Two common considerations in favor of euthanasia

compassion for the painfully and terminally ill


concern for human dignity and freedom of choice

Dyck

against euthanasia

benemortasia

allows for some actions and omissions that may cause or hasten death, but never because they cause or hasten death



(intent behind the act is different)

Euthanasia

intent to cause death

Benemortasia

intent is not death, but it may happen

Suicide

an act that was the immediate intent of ending life and has no other purpose

Dycks four reasons why suicide is wrong

1. It rejects the meaningfulness of life


2. It deprives others of access to you


3. It may cause years of suffering for others


4. It implies that others may commit suicide if they believe their lives to be meaningless

Dyck's intent criterion

it is always impermissable to intend harm

Objections to Dycks intent criterion

1. It's not always impermissible to intend pain as a means to an end


2. it is always impermissible to intend pain as an end

Two worries regarding the legalization of voluntary euthanasia

1. Slippery slope argument. could lead to involuntary and nonvoluntary euthanasia


2. even if we don't get bad social consequences physicians cannot take part in it because it goes against the cardinal principle of medical practice which is to do no harm

James rachels view

euthanasia is permissable

What does rachels say about AMA position

it is wrong

AMA position

while passive euthanasia is permissable, active euthanasia is not

Apparant justification for passive euthanasia

you can allow passive to reduce or not prolong suffering

Rachels response regarding active euthanasia

active euthanasia is preferable on those grounds, which is why we should allow active if we allow passive because active will take the suffering away faster

Death is a great evil

you are asking physicians to be the casue of the great evil. If death is such a great evil, it is common for the physicians to not to want to be the cause of it

Rachels response to death being a great evil

in some cases the continuation of life is as great of an evil as death

Smith Jones case

no morally relevant differnce between killing and letting die



Smith kills the child and Jones lets the child die because they would get money for the kid

Standard abortion argument

1. it is wrong to kill innocent persons


2. Fetuses are innocent persons


3. Therefore, it is wrong to kill a fetus

Argument for a fetus is an innocent person

1. There is no non-arbitrary dividing line between the zygote and the person it will become


2. Therefore, the zygote is a person

Refutation by ananlogy for the argument for fetus being an innocent perosn

1. There is no dividing line between the acorn adn the oak tree it will become


2. Therefore, acorns are oak trees

Argument 2 for fetus is an innocent person

1. All persons have a right to life


2. A fetus is a potential person


3. Therefore, a fetus has right to life

Refutation by analogy 2

1. The president has a right to command missiles


2, I am a potential president


3. Therefore, I have the right to command missiles


this is false so it refutes the previous arguemtn

Thomson's view on abortion

conditional pro choice

The extreme view on abortion

1. All persons have a right to life


2. The fetus is a person


3. The mother has the right to bodily autonomy


4. The right to life is stronger than the right to bodily autonomy


5. Therefore, abortion is impermissible

Thomson's argument against the extreme view of abortion

1. all persons have a right to life


2. The famous violinist is a person


3. You have the right to bodily autonomy


4. The right to life is stronger than the right to bodily autonomy


5. therefore, it is impermissible to unplug yourself from the violinist



this is false so the extreme view is false also

The right to life

The right to have one's life sustained

Thompson argument for rejection to the right to life

Famous violinist and Henry fonda case (touching someone's brow to get better)

The right to not be killed

you have the right to not be killed

Thompon's argument against

famous violinist and self defense

Thomson's view about the right to life

you have the right to not be killed unjustly

The right to life argument Thomson

1. The right to life is the right to not be killed unjustly


2. To be unjust to someone is depriving someone of something they have a right to


3. The right ot life by itself does not get you the right to use someone's body


4. abortion is permissible In cases where a woman doesn't grant the right to her body and she will not die from having the child, abortion is wrong

People seeds

even though you open your window voluntarily, when you take steps to prevent these seeds from coming in by using mesh and the mesh is defective you are still not granting the right to use your home

Good Samaritan

will risk harm to help others

Minimally decent Samaritan

does minimum to help someone

Warren is pro choice or pro life?

pro choice

Warren's two senses of a human being

Genetic and moral sense

Genetic

having a human genetic code

Moral

a full fledged member of the moral community

Standard anti-abortion argument

1. it is wrong to kill an innocent human being


2. A fetus is human being


3. Therefore, it is wrong to kill a fetus

standard abortion argument 1.2

It is wrong to kill an innocent human being (moral sense)


A fetus is an innocent human being (genetic sense)


Therefore, it is wrong to kill a fetus

Warrans critique on 1.2

Though both premises are highly plausible, the argument is invalid due to its equivocation on 'human being'

standard abortion argument 1.3

It is wrong to kill an innocent human being (moral sense)


A fetus is an innocent human being (moral sense)


Therefore, it is wrong to kill a fetus

Warrans critique on 1.3

valid, but the second premise begs the question


standard abortion argument 1.4

It is wrong to kill an innocent human being (genetic sense)


A fetus is an innocent human being (genetic sense)


Therefore, it is wrong to kill a fetus

Warrans critique on 1.4

valid, but he 1st premise begs the question

Five attributes warren associates with being a person

1. Conciousness


2. Reasoning


3. Self-motivated


4. Capacity to communicate


5. Self-awareness



(dont need all to be a person, but if you have none you are not a person)

Warren's claim regarding early stage fetuses

They aren't people because they do not have any of the 5 traits

What are the 2 objections to Warren's claim regarding fetuses

1. Fetus's are like a person


2. Fetuses are potential people

Warren's response to fetuses are like a person

1. The late stage fetus is no different than an animal


2. The late stage fetus is no more person like than a fish


3. A late stage fetus is no more person like than a new born guppy


4. A large stage fetus is no more person like than many other creatures to which we don't attirbute personhood

Warren's response to fetus's are potential people

the rights of actual person's always override the right of a potential

Marquis: What's wrong with killing? What explains the misfortune of premature death?

1. Not the loss of biological life


2. The loss of one's conscious life, but not just any conscious life


3. The loss of the "future goods of "conciousness"

Marquis Future like ours (FLO)

friendships, intellectual pursuits, completed projects, aesthetic enjoyments, physical pleasures, achievement of our goals