• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/68

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

68 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Top 5 Mortality in 1900
1. Pneumonia
2. tuberculosis
3. diarrhea & enteritis
4. heart disease
5. chronic nephritis
3 Temporal patterns
• Short-term: Brief, unexpected outbreaks
• Cyclic patterns: predictable
• Secular Trends: Long-term changes in Morbidity and Mortality patterns
Epidemiology
Distribution and Determinants of disease frequency in pop
Epidemic
at a grand scale (in group- increase in # of what is normally expected) – excess of normal expectancy
Pandemic
international borders (worldwide epidemic)
Endemic
Habitual present of disease in an area or constant presence and normally expected
Hippocrates
• 1st epidemiology
• rational vs. supernatural explanation
• Disease not only affects individuals but also pop.
• Differentiated between endemic and epidemic
• Associates between environment and diseases
Edward Jenner
smallpox vaccine
John snow
cholera --> contaminated water
Ignas Semmelweis
childbed fever and washing hand
Florence Nightingale
statistic hygienic standards
Louis Pasteur
microbes cause disease & vaccination can control disease
Robert Koch
Germ Theory of Disease
2 types of risk factors:
1. Non-modifiable: characteristic cannot be changed.
Example: sex or age
2. Modifiable: characteristic can be changed.
Example: obesity, diet or lifestyle factors
Types of preventions:
1. Primary prevention
2. Secondary prevention
3. Tertiary prevention
Primary prevention:
a. Prevent the development of disease
b. Does not have the disease in question (yet).
i. Therefore, you can immunize that person.
c. If disease is environmentally induced: we can prevent that person’s exposure to the environmental factor
Secondary prevention:
a. Focus on early detection and fast treatment of disease- the purpose is to cure or slow the progression of disease.
b. Use test to screen:
i. Breast examination
ii. Mammogram
iii. Eye test
iv. Blood test
v. Etc.
Tertiary prevention:
a. Therapeutic and rehabilitative when disease is established.
i. Change lifestyle with rehab or hospital program, or medication
Different stages of Disease (Dz):
1. Clinical Dz: signs & symptoms
2. Non-Clinical Dz:
List the types Non-Clinical Dz:
• Preclinical Dz
• Sub-clinical Dz
• Persistent (chronic) Dz
• Latent Dz
Preclinical Dz
disease that is not yet clinically apparent, but destined to progress to clinical disease.
Sub-clinical Dz
Not yet clinically apparent and NOT destined to become clinical apparent.
Persistent (chronic) Dz
persists for years or lifetime
Latent Dz
Person infected w/ Dz but do not show signs and symptoms
Active immunity
when the body produces antibodies when you are infected or by vaccine
Passive immunity
when you acquire immunity by:
a. Injection of serum
b. Placental transfer
c. Breast feeding
Acute (Active) Outbreak
can be deductive or inductive
deductive
You go backward to see what cause Dz
inductive
You go forward to see what the Dz can cause.
Steps to define acute outbreak:
1. Define the epidemic:
a. Define the # of cases (numerator).
b. Define the population at risk (denominator).

2. Examine distribution of cases by: Time, place and time-place interactions.
3. Examine combinations of relevant variables.
4. Develop hypothesis.
5. Test hypothesis.
6. Control measures
2 type of measure of disease frequency:
PREVALENCE
INCIDENCE
1. Cumulative Incidence (CI)
2. Incidence rate (IR)
PREVALENCE
snapshot of proportion who exist with disease @ point in time.
Interpreted as the probability that person will have a disease at a point in time.
PREVALENCE (P) =
P = # of persons existing w/ disease
# of persons in total pop.
INCIDENCE
development of disease who are at risk over a period of time.
2 type of measurement of incidence:
Cumulative Incidence (CI)
Incidence rate (IR):
Cumulative Incidence (CI):
the portion of people who become disease over specific time.
CI is an estimate for the risk (probability) that a person will develop disease in a time frame.
Cumulative Incidence CI =
CI = # of new cases developing in specified time / Total population @ risk
Incidence rate (IR)
the rate at which new cases of disease occurs in a population at risk for disease.
Incidence rate (IR)=
IR = # of new cases developing over study period / Total person-time of observation
Duration
Once they get the disease
Prevalence is proportional to incidence and avg. duration.
Prevalence (P): P = I x avg. D ***under steady state***
What does the prevalence Data measures?
It measures the disease frequency
To determine if study is valid:
1. Chance
2. Bias
3. Confounding
Chance
a. Result due to random sampling variability
b. To measure the effect of chance is by doing a test of statistical significance.
Null hypothesis (Ho) =
NO association
Case control
Selection on basis of DISEASE status.

Investigator go back to determine if they had/had not exposure.
Cohort
Selection on basis of EXPOSURE status.

Investigator start with exposure status and track over time to see what happens to disease.
Prospective cohort study
study in which disease has not yet occurred at initiation of study.

Begin at midpoint and track to FUTURE to see what happens to dz upon exposure
Retrospective Cohort study
Dz occurred in the past prior to initiation of study.

Start w/ exposure status and track BACK to examine effect of exposure or non-exposure on dz.
Intervention Study
Comparison of an outcome (e.g. morbidity or mortality) between two groups of people deliberately subjected to different dietary or drug regimes.
CI (exposed)
# exposed cases/ # exposed

a / (a+b)
CI (non-exposed)
# non-exposed cases / # non-exposed

c / (c+d)
Relative Risk (RR)
indicate a measure of the strength of the association between an exposure and a disease.
Risk ratio:
CIR (cumulative incidence ratio)

CI (exposed)/ CI (non-exposed)
Rate ratio:
IRR (incidence rate ratio)

IR (exposed)/ IR (non-exposed)
Risk Ratio = ?
Rate ratio
What is Relative Risk (RR)
Tells those who are exposed have X times the risk of developing the outcome than the nonexposed
What defines Relative Risk?

Hint: 4 things
Ranges from 0 to infinity
Null value = No association:RR= 1
RR>1 = indicates a + association w/ increase risk of disease

RR<1 = indicates INVERSE association w/ decrease risk of disease
Relative risk formula:

RR = ?
RR = CI(E)/CI(ne)
Can relative risk (RR) be calculated with case-control study?
No, but RR is approximated by odds ratio (OR) = ad/bc

so calculated OR & interpret as relative risk
ecological model
Explain disease causation by imbalance of host, agent, & environmental factors
designed for communicable dz
In ecological model, what factors affect human disease ?
host characteristics
types of agents
environmental factors
What are the steps in investigating an active outbreak?
defining the number of cases
defining the pop. at risk
examining combinations of relevant variables
developing and testing hypotheses
How do you calculate Relative risk?
take the
CI (Exposed) / CI (non-exposed)

CI (exposed) = #of expose case/
# of exposed
a/ (a+b)
CI (non-exposed) = c/ (c+d)
what is the difference between case control and retrospective cohort?
case control: INVESTIGATOR goes back see when or not exposed

retrospective cohort: start w/ EXPOSED and go back when or not exposed.
What method can you use to control variables in a study ?
1.Randomly selecting the subject
2.remove the variable from the study
3.Match subjects in comparison groups by criteria
4.randomly assign subjects to either control or experimental group
What does the null hypothesis mean?
It means that the independent variable does not have an effect.
What is the purpose of a control group?
allow the researcher to determine the influence of external factors that are not suppose to influence the results of the study.