Let’s look at activism as the catalyst to achieve the common purpose. To be a civil society, you need to be active civil society. Our modern world has shown that activism champions a good cause. Activism encourages politicians to listen, scientists to listen and hopefully inspire them to come together for the common good.
Question at Issue: In this particular assignment, we must cross-examine whether sustainability is more about politics or science.
Information: We must look to investigate a better management of resources without excluding technology transfer and funding. Investigations and negotiations should be concluded before approaching heads of state with the initiatives. And the money required for implementation will show up when the …show more content…
I think ignoring these can have the potential to affect their future long term returns.
Implications and Consequences: I believe institutional investors can really affect the balance of power in sustainability. And when I say investors, I mean large investors like pension funds, foundations and endowments. The problem is many politicians and investors think investing in sustainability is expensive. I think it’s less complicated than they think. Many investors may shrug their shoulders are this present reality because they’re environmental issues, but they’re really also economic issues and THAT makes them relevant to risk and return.
Have you seen that show “Shark Tank?” Have you noticed when they’re looking at a company before they invest, they want to know financial data. They immediately ask about the sales growth, cash flow, what are they going to get for their investment. They’re not really looking at things in this approach environment, social and governance, are they? But what I notice about them is that they focus on the here and now. But as sustainability matters more financially today, and a lot of science indicates more tomorrow, shouldn’t they begin
Question at Issue: In this particular assignment, we must cross-examine whether sustainability is more about politics or science.
Information: We must look to investigate a better management of resources without excluding technology transfer and funding. Investigations and negotiations should be concluded before approaching heads of state with the initiatives. And the money required for implementation will show up when the …show more content…
I think ignoring these can have the potential to affect their future long term returns.
Implications and Consequences: I believe institutional investors can really affect the balance of power in sustainability. And when I say investors, I mean large investors like pension funds, foundations and endowments. The problem is many politicians and investors think investing in sustainability is expensive. I think it’s less complicated than they think. Many investors may shrug their shoulders are this present reality because they’re environmental issues, but they’re really also economic issues and THAT makes them relevant to risk and return.
Have you seen that show “Shark Tank?” Have you noticed when they’re looking at a company before they invest, they want to know financial data. They immediately ask about the sales growth, cash flow, what are they going to get for their investment. They’re not really looking at things in this approach environment, social and governance, are they? But what I notice about them is that they focus on the here and now. But as sustainability matters more financially today, and a lot of science indicates more tomorrow, shouldn’t they begin