The Pros And Cons Of The Atomic Bomb

Superior Essays
Register to read the introduction… Truman was the most important in the deciding factor of this situation. He was immediately thrown into this position after President Roosevelt's death on April 1, 1945 (Jennings). Though Truman didn't know much about the situation, he was one hundred percent confused, he knew the war had to end so American lives could be saved, even though he was aware that alternatives to using the bomb existed (Bird). If Truman had been more informed on the atomic bomb, he might have made a better decision, the right decision. Truman was informed on the atomic bomb mostly by James Byrnes, also known as "Mr. Atomic Bomb" (Jennings). Byrnes and General Groves had a big impact on the matter. They basically manipulated Truman into doing whatever they said because they knew everything there was to know about the atomic bomb and Hiroshima (Hunt,403). Henry Stimson was another figure involved. He along with Groves were the two who wrote the order for dropping the atomic bomb, even though Stimson was very cautious about it all (Jennings). Finally Truman had decided in Potsdam to use the bomb after a successful …show more content…
The scientists were servants, paid to complete what the U.S. want them to (Morley). Only a few people who worked on the bomb actually knew what they were doing with it (Thomas, 23). The scientists had to think of the morality of the subject. They believed Japan should not have to go without warning that an atomic bomb would be dropped. In the end, Japan was warned from leaflets that bombs would be dropped, but not until the city was in ruins which makes the bombing even worse. People think everyone involved was pro bomb, but this is far from the truth. Dwight D. Eisenhower knew Japan was defenseless and was completely against using the bomb. Henry H. Arnold, Commanding General of the U.S. Army Air Forces, also knew Japan was hopeless because they had lost control of their own air, as well as the importing of food, oil, and industrial supplies needed to carry on in a war (Freeman). Even General Marshall, who was one of the three most important people, questioned the bomb because it would destroy America's image (Jennings). Henry Stimson was haunted by the bomb according to Evan Thomas. He would refer to the bomb as "the thing", "the dreadful" and "the awful" (Thomas, 25). We have to remember this was someone directly involved in the situation. Robert Lewis, co-pilot, had even said, "My God, what have we

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In Document K Secretary of War Henry Stinson says clearly, “The decision to use the atomic bomb was a decision that brought death to over a hundred thousand Japanese… But this deliberate, premeditated destruction was our least abhorrent alternative”. America had been bombing civilian and industrial cities for almost a year which alone caused many more deaths than the bombs. Also, the operation to invade the Japanese mainland would have ended in a bloodbath of millions of civilian deaths including those in Hiroshima and Nagasaki because the Americans had already planned to bomb those industrial cities months before. It was fair for the Japanese to fear occupation but anyone could tell that the germans and the americans were some of the nicest…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On August 6th 1945 United States Harry S Truman made the 20th century’s most impactful decision; dropping the Atom bomb on Hiroshima and later Nagasaki. Truman considered the Japanese that would die, but he ultimately saved American lives. Truman also was thinking about American POW, and took their deaths into consideration before dropping the bombs. Lastly Truman dropped the atom bombs in order to protect the world from Russia’s widespread communist ways.…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Firebombing Dbq

    • 1692 Words
    • 7 Pages

    One theory is that dropping the atomic bomb was absolutely necessary. There are several key points to this argument, that the Japanese would never surrender unconditionally, that war would drag on, that a land invasion would be costly, long, deadly, and the bomb was needed specifically to end the war swiftly and with as few casualties as possible. “At the time, there was a wide consensus in support of the decision to strike among the members of the committee. Stimson was very adamant that the bomb be used”.⁴ A key part of the problem was the belief that the Japanese would never surrender.…

    • 1692 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The decision to drop the bombs was not carried out by the decision of President Truman alone. When he succeeded the Presidency after Roosevelt died, he honestly insinuated to the press that he was not confident to take the highest position of the country. Much to his surprise presumably, when he was briefly informed about the Manhattan Project. Roosevelt did not share the secret project to Truman before he died. Nevertheless, Truman’s inexperience in foreign policy, urged him to seek advice from the members of the cabinet, luminaries, and selective leaders of the United States’ allies.…

    • 1911 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The bomb saved lives, also the Interim Committee supported President Truman, and Japan were given warnings to surrender. The nuclear weapon was used to save American lives. American lives were in danger as well as American soil. The Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor, moreover killing over 2,000 Americans.…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    From an astounding amount of examples against the idea that the U.S. only used the bomb to attack japan the answer is no. The bomb was used also, to intimidate the Soviet Union. In document H, as stated before Truman talks about why we must use the bomb to stop japan, but everything he says could also be applied to a future war, one with the Soviet Union.…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On August 9th, 1945 a second bomb was dropped by the United states, at Nagasaki resulting in a final surrender from Japan. General Leslie R. Forests, the man in charge of sorting out the Manhattan Project, which tackled the issue of creating and conveying the atomic blast, evaluated that another iota bomb which would be prepared to use against Japan by August 17th or 18th, however council members who were ambitious in ending the war decided to drop the bombs earlier and dote on Japan’s abdication. Ahead of schedule in 1939, the world 's academic group found that German physicists had taken in the mysteries of part a uranium iota. Fears soon spread over the prospect of Nazi researchers using that vitality to deliver a bomb equipped for…

    • 1007 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    First, I investigated the sources that were against the use of the bomb before the bomb was dropped including the intentions behind the bomb, and concerns from the Interim Committee . Then I looked at the evidence against the bomb after the bomb was dropped, including Henry Stimson’s concerns, and the horrific loss of Japanese life due to the bomb. It is interesting to see the difference between the worries before the bomb and after the bomb. The first document I looked at was Dropping the Atomic Bomb was Neither Necessary Nor Justifiable by Gar Alperovitz. In his essay he argues one of the reasonings for the use of the bomb was to scare the Soviets and to prevent an invasion of the Red Army in Manchuria.…

    • 1359 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    From a military standpoint it was not necessary as the Japanese were ready to collapse; it was only necessary in order to allow the US to get what they want. Document H speaks to this, dismissing the American claim that its use was necessary to end the war and thus causing the Document 's critique of the decision as making America "the arch-enemy of humanity" to be not far off the mark, as the evidence suggests that America cared not for Japan or its people but only for how to advance American interests. From a scientific standpoint, the power of the bomb was already known and needed not to be tested again, let alone on actual people. Finally, any positive diplomatic effects the bomb might have brought about were either nonexistent or overshadowed by the cost of the moral high-ground the US enjoyed before its use: tensions with the Soviets worsened, the Cold War became inevitable, and millions of people were affected. Thus the use of the atomic bomb was a diplomatic blunder to say the…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Decision to Drop the Atomic Bombing in Japan In August 1945, the United States dropped two atomic bombs, causing major destruction and life threatening issues, over the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Everyone has their own take on what really happened and have their own perspective on controversies regarding the United States’ decision to drop the bombs. Perspectives that I will be discussing today are from three disciplines: scientific view (Leo Szilard), journalism view (Wilfred Bruchett), and historical view (a writer of an article called “The Decision to Drop the Bomb” and Bernard Feld’s article “Lessons from Hiroshima and Nagasaki”). Each have their own unique approach on the atomic bomb and it’s affects.…

    • 1803 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Decision to Drop the Bomb During the summer of 1945, things were looking pretty grim for Imperial Japan, as they were the last axis power left and had been under constant firebombing for the United States, President Truman chose to drop two atomic bombs, one on Hiroshima on August 6th and one on Nagasaki on August 9th. Since before either of the two bombs had been dropped, it has been debated whether or not it was the right decision. Truman stated that the bombs were dropped to save American lives, but many argue over the government’s other motives at the time. Many bring up valid points over why the bomb should not have been dropped and that the government public justification for dropping the bomb was based off of false information, but ultimately the motivation behind dropping the bomb, hidden by the government or not, outweighs the reasons for not dropping the bomb.…

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    being President for two weeks and he had already had a significant decision to make. The bomb was first tested in Alamogordo, Mexico and was successful. In July of 1945 Harry Truman had the decision to drop the bomb on Hiroshima on August 6, 1945 . There are two sides to using of this bomb, the traditional and revisionist.…

    • 1233 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As it is essential to recognize that not only was Japan ready to surrender and were given no choice to modify its unconditional surrender. But also destroyed two cities which were limited in military value and had civilians out number Japanese troops, but also were destroyed simply fro power in politics between the U.S and the Soviet Union. The facts from the presidents administrators, secretary of war and even Truman’s chief of staff all stood together and stated that it was unethical, barbaric and abhorrent. Many historians have fought continuously over which was decision was right or wrong to choose, but most evidence indicates that it was the wrong thing to do morally. Furthermore, the bomb was used for several wrong reasons such as causing fear to both Soviet and Japanese governments, in order to put an end to the war and be capable of unconditionally place restrictions at both governments basically holding both countries hostage until their demands were…

    • 1429 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many people argue whether the US’s decision to drop the Atomic Bomb on Hiroshima was a justified action or not. In my opinion, the bomb was justifiable in its actions since it accomplished a goal that could not have been done without it. The dropping of the Atomic Bomb shortened the war and with it saved many lives on both the Allied side and the Japanese side, it also justified the expense it cost to make the bomb and prior to the bombing, the Japanese were given numerous chances to accept unconditional surrender. In short it is a justifiable act since it brought benefits with it’s actions that could not have been achieved through conventional terms. The Manhattan Project was the codename for the US led effort to develop and successfully use an Atomic Bomb.…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    On the morning of August 6, 1945, the people of Hiroshima watched as two B-29 planes flew over the city. Many continued on with their day, not giving the planes a second glance. Other spectators continued watching in curiosity as the sight of the planes diminished into the sky away from the city and parachutes came down from them. Within seconds and without a trace of sound, the city of Hiroshima was completely destroyed.…

    • 1780 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays