Australian Legal System

Great Essays
Legal systems can be dated back to the ancient peoples. There are many different legal systems that have evolved in other parts of the world. There are two types of legal system, the secular and religious legal system. It is argued that the Australian legal system is radically different to other legal systems. This, however, is not the case through findings and comparison with the Madayin legal system and Talmudic Jewish legal system. There are many similarities found such as the outcome that all legal systems thrive to achieve, the authority figures, the adaptabilities of the laws, origins of laws, and the teachings.
There are many wonders in life in which asks the bigger questions such as the origins of moral judgment in humans. It leads
…show more content…
In order to support this idea, the history of the Australian legal system should be discussed. Australia is a common law country and the history of the Australian legal system stems from English common law system.2
Common law is judge made laws that are created based around areas that are not included. The judges are required to interpret legislation if there is a dispute about the meaning or how to apply an Act in a case. These interpretations then become part of the common law.3 The Australian legal system arrayed during the First Fleet, in which the British Parliament passed legislation and Letter Patents to create the criminal and civil courts when colonies were set up in Australia.4 Furthermore, it also granted the colonies to set up its own local system of government, called the ‘responsible government’, in which it allowed the colonies to create its own
…show more content…
However, even though there are various sources that protect the rights of humans in the Australian legal system, there are many cases in which issues, gaps or ambiguities are found in legislation and common law. In order to combat with issues such as these, the courts can incorporate international concepts and norms into domestic law.13 An example of this would be the case of Toonen v Australia, a
Tasmanian homosexual complained in 1992 to the United Nations Humans
Rights Committee regarding the Tasmanian Criminal Code, in which it

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    VICTORIAN CIVIL AND ADMINISTRATION TRIBUNAL (VCAT) The Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT)is organized under the Victoria Civil And Administrative Tribunal Act 1998 and it started functioning on the date of 1st July 1998.VCAT has 15 boards and tribunals to offer and conducts hearings in some areas in Victoria specifically in suburban and regional. Its location was in 55 King street,Melbourne. VCAT vision is to render service to Victorians people in a fair,low cost and efficient way to help resolved disputes. Providing a low cost,accessible,efficient and independent tribunal who deliver a high quality resolution is the purpose of VCAT.Through the years,It has progress to take in new jurisdictions and functions under various acts,rules…

    • 1102 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Polarising the nation, The Queen v Baden-Clay case demonstrates the extent to which the Australian media can adversely affect the success of legal proceedings. The Australian adversarial system enforces strict rules of procedure, which are imperative to achieve equality and adequate protection in society. Although it is deemed effective, imperfections are evident (Skwirk Online Education, Nd). The Gerald Baden-Clay case highlights the strengths and weaknesses of the criminal justice system through the efficiency of the standard of evidence, rights of the accused, precedent and appeal used within the relentless trial to prove an accused murderer guilty.…

    • 1121 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Compromised of its own handling of various matters illustrates how the legal hierarchy is an important measure of the Australian legal…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    International crime involves any act or omission that has international consequences on nation states. This includes transnational crimes, which are crimes that take place across international borders such as, human trafficking and people smuggling across borders, arm trafficking, fraud, cybercrime or terrorism. Unlike transnational crime, crimes against the international community are a collection of offences that are recognised by the international community as being of universal concern, such as genocide and war crimes. However, international law is difficult to enforce due to state sovereignty preventing the legal system to effectively deal with international crime. International measures implemented to combat crime include the international…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Laws need to be constantly reformed even if the decision only helps out a certain group in the society, as it creates a neighbourly atmosphere in the society. It also allows minority groups to feel self belonging, in a world where many people are trying to abolish same-sex marriage many people can consider Australia a safe zone where they feel accepted which in fact helps cultural diversity and increases the countries tourism. The ‘De Facto’ includes same-sex marriage in 28 different pieces of…

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Australian Sentencing

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Hypothesis: although indefinite sentencing appears to ignore the rights of the individual in favour of the protection of the community; as one item of choice in a raft of sentencing options, it has improved the capacity of the criminal justice system to protect individual rights and keep peace and order in society. The Criminal Justice system is a system of laws and rulings aiming to protect community members and their property. It determines which events causing injury or offence to community members are criminal offences. Criminal offenders may be punished through the law by fines, imprisonment or community service.…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Olaf Dietrich: Case Study

    • 1537 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Once you have chosen a case, begin conducting your research. Your research should cover the following details: 1 The individual or group that had their rights infringed—who were they? Olaf Dietrich had his rights infringed. 2 Which right(s) was infringed? How was the right(s) infringed?…

    • 1537 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In a criminal trial, a jury is a group usually comprised of twelve randomly chosen adults, whose role is to hear evidence, apply the law as directed by the judge, and then collectively decide if the defendant is guilty or not guilty of the crime they have been accused of, based only on the facts given. Juries have played a significant role in Australia’s justice system for quite some time, though in more recent years the role of juries has been reduced. In 2011, the NSW government changed the law so that accused persons could apply for judge alone trials and, with consent from the Director of Public, avoid juries entirely (Whitbourn 2013). Currently there is much debate as to whether or not the jury system should be scrapped entirely for criminal trials in NSW.…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In Australia Aboriginal people are far more likely to be arrested than non-Aboriginal people, and account for a quarter of all deaths in custody. It has been said that “the Justice system of Australia still has a long way to go in responding effectively to the needs of Indigenous people trapped in the cycle of the criminal justice system and, more particularly, in preventing deaths in custody (Corrin and Douglas, 2008, p.531). Reasons for this can be attributed to the mistrust of the police, laws around drinking that are seen as unfair by the community, perceived double standards of those working in the police force, the failure of the justice system to implement alternatives to detaining and holding arrested people in custody, failure of police to assess health of people being detained, investigations that seem to be biased and not carried out ethically, and the failure of the justice…

    • 1483 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dworkin on Judicial Discretion in “Hard Cases” Lu Zhao Boyu (Bozy) | A0127866R In the standard courtroom, one could reasonably expect the judge to be the one responsible for the holding of a case. However, does and should the judge exercise his own discretion when deciding cases? Prominent legal theorist H. L. A. Hart claims that judges do exercise discretion, especially in “hard cases”, where there is no pre-existing or unambiguous rule. To this matter, Hart’s brilliant student Ronald Dworkin offers an alternative theory, which argues that judges do not have discretion and should follow principles instead of rules, even in “hard cases”.…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Constitution was drafted in 1787 and ratified by the states in 1789. In the Case of Marybury v. Madison, the Supreme Court ruled that it had powers to interpret the Constitution. According to legal resources, constitutional law deals with the fundamental principles by which the regime exercises its ascendancy. In some instances, these principles grant concrete powers to the regime, such as the puissance to tax and spend for the welfare of the population. Other times, constitutional principles act to place limits on what the regime can do, such as enjoining the apprehending of an individual without sufficient cause.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It is supposed to give back a voice to the people, and stop any corruption in governments. But the question to ask is whether the absolute separation of power actually exists in the Australian legal system. We can begin by looking at the billing process as a good example…

    • 1362 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    American Legal Tradition

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Legal traditions within a country are important to understand because they are directly related to the type of justice system the country will formalize. The United States criminal justice system is known to have derived from the Common Law legal tradition, which is one of the four major families of law (Dammer and Albanese, 2014, p. 42). It should be noted that most legal traditions originated from the type of religion practiced in the region or country. Originally Common Law originated from when William the Conqueror captured England and became its King. He faced difficulty trying to rule his subjects as he was French, and due to some other anticipated obstacles when conquering a country.…

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    EXPLAIN THE MAIN DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE LEGAL SYSTEM OF ENGLAND AND WALES AND THOSE OF CIVIL LAW COUNTRIES AND EXPLAIN THE MERITS AND PROBLEMS OF THESE LEGAL SYSTEMS A HISTORY OF TWO TYPES OF LAW The two main systems of law in the world today are common law and civil law. The system used in England and Wales is common law which has an evolving history dating from the Norman conquest of England in 1066 and the local customs of the Anglo-Saxons. English common law spread throughout the world during the growth of the British empire between the 16th and 18th centuries.…

    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The history of Equity in New Zealand, its relationship with common law, and the ‘fusion’ debate The equitable jurisdiction was defined in 1932 as “that body of rules administered by our English courts of justice which, were it not for the operation of the Judicature Acts, would be administered only by those courts which would be known as courts of Equity”. The New Zealand legal system is based on English common law and therefore the principles of Equity as they stand today are rooted in English history. However, following the implementation of the Judicature Act 1908 (NZ) and subsequent legal developments, the views of the New Zealand courts with respect to the intermingling of equitable and common law remedies can be observed to now be markedly…

    • 1208 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics