Australian Sentencing

Improved Essays
Hypothesis: although indefinite sentencing appears to ignore the rights of the individual in favour of the protection of the community; as one item of choice in a raft of sentencing options, it has improved the capacity of the criminal justice system to protect individual rights and keep peace and order in society.

The Criminal Justice system is a system of laws and rulings aiming to protect community members and their property. It determines which events causing injury or offence to community members are criminal offences. Criminal offenders may be punished through the law by fines, imprisonment or community service.

The human rights in Australia have been developed under the Australian Parliament and fortified by institutions of
…show more content…
There is a maximum penalty set for each crime normally with a greater penalty brought forward if the offence takes place with aggravation. In some cases the Australian Government may introduce special legislation to fight a particular type of crime, for example, hooning in an area where a special legislation has been passed. A hooning offence has a maximum of 40 penalty units or 6 months imprisonment and the vehicle you were driving can be impounded or immobilised for 90 days.

The Australian sentencing legislation includes a list of traditional sentencing purposes without according to any propriety to a single purpose. For example, in the sentencing acts 1991 (Vic) the only purpose for which a sentence may imposed are punishment, denunciation, rehabilitation, community protection and deterrence or any combination of two or more of those purposes.

The criminal code act of Australia is generally supervised by individual jurisdictions in the Commonwealth of Australia. The jurisdictions include the six sates, with only a small subset of criminal activities reserved for Commonwealth government to

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Commerce law assessment task 3- Lachlan O’Malley Mandatory Sentencing in New South Wales 1. Mandatory Sentencing- a mandatory sentence is a court decision where legal discretion is limited by law. Most frequently, people convicted of certain crimes such as armed robbery or murder must be punished with at least a minimum number of years set in prison. 2.…

    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the most recent couple of years the verbal confrontation about whether obligatory sentencing ought to be nullified, and judges utilizing their own carefulness ought to happen has turned into a well known dialog in the United States. I see upsides and downsides for both sides. Mandatory least have filled the correctional facilites and penitentiaries with an excess of peaceful, first time guilty parties which brings about prison/jail packing and more obligation. President Obama expressed in a discourse "We have to lower long obligatory least sentences or dispose of them totally. " Opponents of compulsory least sentences contend that: Minority litigants are excessively detained contrasted with Caucasian respondents under the compulsory least…

    • 248 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    In 1976, A. L. Guenther put forth the notion that our criminal justice system is “unfair, harsh, and biased,” as well as saying that we have a criminal processing system and not a criminal justice system. While these statements may have been made four decades ago, they still ring true today. I agree with Guenther’s comments, as our criminal justice system is unfair to the offenders they deal with, carries out harsh penalties on these members of society, and is biased to different groups over the history of America. Offenders are usually treated like statistics, not like members of society.…

    • 1708 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Group based correctional services are set up for delinquents giving them a chance to reintegrate back into the community to serve their remaining jail time (Antonacci, 158). After the delinquent has served a segment of their time in jail, the delinquent is evaluated for the risk or danger they may cause the community and recidivism, then after that they are permitted to serve the remained of their time in the community, if the evaluation goes well (Antonacci, 158). The house arrest of Martha Stewart resulted in much public debate about this community corrections approach. Some people in society believed this was not an acceptable punishment to be given to Martha Stewart for her actions, as they believed that the punishment appeared to be light…

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mick Gooda, Social Justice Commissioner for the Australian Human Rights Commission, has described justice reinvestment as ‘sensible, practical things that can be done on the ground to make communities safer and reduce offending’. What is justice reinvestment, how does it work, and what are some of the ‘sensible, practical things’ proposed? In March 2010, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social Justice Commissioner, Mick Gooda, explained the concept of justice reinvestment in a speech titled: “Justice Reinvestment: a new solution to the problem of Indigenous over-representation in the criminal justice system’ to the advocacy organisation Australians for Native Title and Reconciliation.…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Punishment in contemporary society is concerned with managing crime at an acceptable level rather than correction (Disagree) The Australian criminal justice system today focuses on rehabilitating offenders to reduce recidivism rates. Rehabilitating offenders is not only beneficial, it is a cost-effective means of reducing society’s incarceration expenses and lessens further harm to that society. This essay briefly discusses these programs and demonstrates through studies the effectiveness of offender programs in reducing recidivism rates and how these programs help offenders reintegrate back into society as law-abiding citizens. If Australian society stopped caring about rehabilitation, offender programs would cease and imprisonment certainly becomes a punishment without any redeeming features.…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The issues in federal sentencing plan to alleviate the disparities in sentencing. Usually, the guidelines are often misused in the imposition of extreme sentences on persons who have a crime that does not deserve long-term prison or sentencing. This results in overcrowding in the prisons. The overcrowding comes as a result that most of the criminals are subjected to long-term prisons having committed crimes that do not deserve sentencing hence overcrowding example in Canada. There is the issue that some of the judges treat these guidelines as fast and hard rules that are imposed against a criminal especially the drug offenders.…

    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This essay will discuss the different models of the bill of rights adopted in other countries to demonstrate how Australia is isolated from global trend. It will assess human right protection…

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The phrases non-custodial sentence, community sentencing and alternative sentencing are commonly used interchangeably to refer to the same concept. Community sentencing is phrase used in criminal justice to punish offenders that have been convicted without using either capital punishment. Community sentencing is subdivided into different categories such. The first type of community sentencing is compulsory work where offenders are required to work for a local community for up to 300 hours by performing tasks such as; removing graffiti from buildings and collecting litter. The second type of community sentencing involves taking the offender through a series of programs that can change his behavior.…

    • 1288 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Indigenous Australians are grossly over-represented in the criminal justice system. However, the true extent of this over-representation differs between individual areas. Despite indigenous Australians only making up two per cent of the population, they accounted for over twenty seven per cent of the total prison population in 2014 (ABS). This high rate of imprisonment is not due to indigenous people being more likely to commit crime than other Australians, but rather indigenous Australians are over-represented due to a higher rate of offending and recidivism and also largely in part due to the fact that they have a lower rate of referrals to diversionary programs. This is largely due to the discriminatory practices by the police and the judicial…

    • 1204 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    AFFIRMATIVE I affirm: Resolved: The abuse of illegal drugs ought to be treated as a matter of public health, not of criminal justice. I define the following key terms: Treated- to act or behave toward (a person) in some specified way to consider or regard in a specified way, and deal with accordingly: 2. to consider or regard in a specified way, and deal with accordingly 3.to deal with (a disease, patient, etc.) in order to relieve or cure.…

    • 1305 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    1. The purposes of criminal punishment can simply be divided into two schools of thought: retributionists and preventionists. Identify, define, and discuss the several criminal law key term words that are associated with these two schools of thought and conclude with your opinion of which is the most effective.....or why all are concurrently effective. Be thorough since this is important concerning the purposes of punishment in a modern society. 1.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Criminal Sentencing Essay

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The criminal justice system maintains different goals when attempting to correct deviant and illicit behavior. In accordance to the sentencing guidelines established by United States Sentencing Commission (2011), punitive sentences are to incorporate a purpose for the sentence. Criminal sentencing can be categorized into six areas with distinctive goals: general and specific deterrence, incapacitation, retributive, rehabilitative, and equity/restitution. The sentencing goals are not exclusive and at times overlap in achieving its purpose. Furthermore, one goal is not better than another, but rather one would be more applicable in certain situations than another.…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The criminal justice system is structured in such a way that the legal apparatus provides freedom to the judges to practice discretion. The legal apparatus used is based on the provisions of the Criminal Justice Act [1993] and the various amendments that have been made to streamline the law. The Irish Constitution of 1937 has been an instrumental force in the creation of court systems regarding the sentencing procedures. The provisions of the Criminal Justice Acts enable judges to determine the sentence alongside the guidelines of the law. Factors like the level of cooperation with the court procedures, the impact of the offences on the victims, the criminal history of the concerned individuals, and facts of the alleged offence.…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    These views are the variables that model the criminal justice system. Defining crime is very broad. However, to simplify the subject matter, the traditional meaning states that a crime is an offence that results in community punishment. The current situation exists because what crime is depends on the community. To further elaborate, the reason defining crime is not simple is due to the fact that what is considered right and…

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays