Civil Disobedience In Henry David Thoreau's Quiz Show

Improved Essays
Life is flustered with a mountain of decisions that can shape people’s lives for either the better or the worse. Children are told the importance of standing out from their peers and to be themselves, yet Children tend to assimilate to their peers ideas, customs, and behaviors. Some may argue that assimilation is outgrown as those children reach adulthood, but sadly that is not the case. The 1994 classic film “Quiz Show,” follows the journey of different players deciding to be unlawful and follow the money, or to stick by their virtues. Peer pressure and the desire for power can sway any person’s judgement, but it is up to them to decide if they should keep up the lie, or tell the truth. Ralph Waldo Emerson wrote “Self Reliance” in 1841 …show more content…
In his essay, “Civil Disobedience,” Henry David Thoreau, spoke about the lack of facts behind voting within the government. Thoreau said, “All voting is a sort of gaming, like checkers or backgammon, with a slight moral tinge to it” (Thoreau p. 22). As a Middle-class citizen, Stempel was laughed at by the court for expressing the truth. First-class citizen, Charles Van Doren, however, was revered and praised for finally telling the truth. This verifies Thoreau’s beliefs regarding voting and court situations. Those who religiously watched “Twenty-One,” criticized Stempel for his truthful claims. Dan Enwright said “He blames Charles Van Doren for his downfall. And of course, the real downfall of Herbert Stempel has always been Herbert Stempel.” People targeted Stempel because he had not been born into a wealthy family and a luxurious lifestyle and therefore, they assumed that he was only speaking up for the fame and money. Thoreau commented that “A man has not everything to do, but something; and because he cannot do everything, it is not necessary that he should do something wrong,” (Thoreau p.25) referencing that men do not have the powers of the divine, otherwise, they have the power to lie and dominate

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Civil Disobedience Thoreau declares, “The only obligation which I have a right to assume is to do at any time what I think is right” (Ogunye). He ostensibly acknowledges no authority other than that of his own moral sense. In this essay, civil disobedience will be defined as the unwillingness to obey civil laws in an attempt to prompt change in governmental law or procedure, demonstrated by the use of nonviolent methods. The matter in question, then, is whether such civil disobedience is justified in a democratic society. The value of this essay’s argument is fairness; that is, defending human rights and granting each his or her due.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The ideas and the moral views seen among Thoreau and King differed mainly because of the timeline in which the essay and the letter was wrote. Thoreau lived during a time when negotiation was non-existent that is he met the government ,”I meet this American government, or its representative, the State government, directly, and face to face, once a year- no more- in the person of its tax-gatherer..” (Thoreau). But on the other hand the King had the capability to gather groups and strength themselves which did not have any violence this led to increased their success in the Civil rights movement. King had four basic steps for his nonviolent campaign,” collection of the facts to determine whether injustices exist; negotiation; self-purification;…

    • 144 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since Henry David Thoreau coined the phrase “Civil Disobedience” in an essay, the term has been assigned to a number of movements throughout history. The essay’s ideas have inspired several significant figures throughout history, including Mahatma Gandhi, Martin Luther King, Jr., and Nelson Mandela (Source A). These three men led non-violent struggles in which unjust laws were disobeyed, and they each finally won profound and positive societal changes. But not every act of civil disobedience is successful. There were specific factors that allowed certain movements to triumph and others to be crushed.…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Governments are created by the people to protect their rights. When a government is corrupted and fails to do its job, the people rally against it because it has strayed from its purpose. Many different people have different viewpoints on their government. An excerpt of “Civil Disobedience” shows Henry David Thoreau’s ideal government, and how his current government went against the ideals he believed in. In Chapter Seventeen of “The Grapes of Wrath”, John Steinbeck explains how the camps of the migrant families create a union and a government, even for one night.…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    From the opening paragraph of the essay Thoreau believes and moral were clearly understood in the Civil Disobedience. He states that “That government is best, which governs least"(Thoreau).…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Henry David Thoreau’s essay “Civil Disobedience” discusses why man should resist the oppressive government and the evil inflicted upon him in the form of law. He illustrates that this evil will never cease to exist as long as man lets it, so the only way to stop the it is to disobey, resist, and rebel in order to bring a change to the government. Thoreau advocates for the idea of rebellion by saying, “They think that, if they should resist, the remedy would be worse than the evil. But it is the fault of the government itself that the remedy is worse than the evil” (2). The government's solution for revolution is to punish those who oppose them with incarceration and/or violence, which is worse than the consequence they receive if they just…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Both Henry David Thoreau and Martin Luther King Jr. define the profound difference between just and unjust in their writings, “On the Duty of Civil Disobedience” and “Letter from a Birmingham Jail.” While the two men have a different sound throughout each of their own pieces, there is much that they agree upon about civil disobedience once clearly thought out and read. With that being said, this paper will, respectively, discuss the general content of both writings, as well as the prominent similarities and differences noticeable in the two pieces. An example of political/cultural problems the United States is facing today that emulate civil disobedience will also be presented that link to both pieces. Towards the end of this paper, I intend…

    • 1571 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As former President of the United States, Thomas Jefferson once said, “We hold these truths to be self-evident: that all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” Thoma Jefferson implies that the people are not to be controlled nor deprived of their rights, no matter their skin color or race. In Henry David Thoreau’s essay, “On the Duty of Civil Disobedience,” he influences the people on the fact that a government is not made nor ruled by government officials, but by the people of the country. Henry David Thoreau provides coherent details on why he wants a government who works fast and is organized.…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Henry David Thoreau, born July 12, 1817 in Concord, Massachusetts, was known to be an American transcendentalist and philosopher. Thoreau became known for the essay he wrote when he spent a night in jail due to his refusal to pay taxes in objection to slavery and the Mexican War. The essay was published and titled “Resistance of Civil Government” but also known as “Civil Disobedience.” It is unsurprising that the government is dirty and corrupt so the purpose of the essay was to influence readers to not fear but protest government laws and commands or vote them out.…

    • 1663 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout history, there have been individuals and forms of government lacking a moral conscience, and this will most likely continue to occur. Many argue that this is merely a facet of human nature - we, as human beings, are inherently greedy and corrupt. However, there are those who contrast sharply with this view, crying out against the wrongdoings of certain powers, pushing for change and reform. Henry David Thoreau is a prime example of these individuals. Using personification, forthright and cynical diction, and rhetorical questions, Thoreau criticizes the American government, and certain aspects of society in “Civil Disobedience” and the inability of individuals to reach their true potential in “Walden”.…

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Henry David Thoreau’s “Civil Disobedience” was a well written excerpt from 1848, which discussed the many issues on the power, process, and abilities of the United States government. One of the main problems he talks about is the problem of the government overruling the majority to their own legislative consciences. He believed that because of this, the American government was corrupt and faulty. He states: “The standing army is only an arm of the standing government. The government itself, which is only the mode which the people have chosen to execute their will, is equally liable to be abused and perverted before the people can act through it”.…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Henry David Thoreau’s Civil Disobedience and Plato’s Allegory of the Cave reveal differences and similarities on their outlook on government and solutions to rid their prospective states of certain problems. These solutions focus on freeing oneself from conforming to societal norms in favor of seeking “enlightenment” and awareness. The aforementioned great minds of their times both argue variations of the same views on human existence and an individual 's role in their respective societies. At their core, these two political philosophies urge humanity to threaten the safety of the status quo; they push man to dare to be skeptics, dare to climb out of the depths of their limited perspectives, dare to question what is true reality…

    • 1355 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil Disobedience Essay Civil Disobedience is an essay written by Henry D. Thoreau in 1849. In his essay he uses rhetorical question to engage his audience, and he uses those questions to make a statement how a government should be run. Thoreau is quoted in the paper saying “I heartily accept the motto, "That government is best which governs least". Using this argument, Thoreau uses rhetorical questions to prompt the reader into thinking of the idea of rebellion. They are used well in the essay, because they display his pathos, logos, and ethos.…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Henry David Thoreau, in his essay “Civil Disobedience” argues that American citizens should not be loath to disobey their corrupt and useless government, using metaphor as a rhetorical device to prove his point and provide a call to action for readers. In the essay, Thoreau describes the government as a corrupt, immoral, and often useless agent, and strongly criticizes the American population for following it so blindly. He encourages readers to act in protest of their unjust government, urging them to act with their consciences and not based on what the law dictates; he also insists that they engage in civil disobedience, and refuse to pay certain taxes. By using metaphor in the essay, Thoreau makes the piece more readable and relatable,…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Individual’s Moral Obligation to stand for what is Right In “Civil Disobedience” by Thoreau asserts that government seldom shows itself sufficient and that it often derives its power from the majority; who are its subjects. Furthermore, Thoreau underscores that the state, just as corporates have no conscience, but through its citizens, can be viewed as conscientious or reckless. Consequently, it is up to the people to practice conscience when endeavoring into their activities.…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays