Hegel: The Liberalist View Of Freedom

Improved Essays
One of the main critiques of Hegel in regards to the liberalism view of freedom is that the view of liberalism is only a partial view of freedom. By referring to liberalism as a partial freedom, Hegel is referring to its subjectivity. To Hegel, liberal freedom is a subjective freedom. In other words, it is a negative freedom, it is a system of rights. This is because according to Hegel, freedom is the “the worthiest and the holiest thing in humanity” where the core of freedom lies in free will (Par. 215). Hence, for Hegel, without free will, individuals do not possess freedom. This is why Hegel refers to freedom as an abstract concept, as freedom by itself, is just an abstract right. As a result, when an individual thinks to himself “I will”, …show more content…
In this way, the rights of individuals and subjects are objective in the sense that they are integrated into a type of system and are clearly outlined, as opposed to having a subjective sense, where the rights of persons are changeable and can easily be overcome. With that said, Hegel says individuals can be fully free only when they participate in what Hegel refers to as “the ethical life”. Ethical life “is the Idea of freedom in that, on the one hand, it is the good become alive – the good endowed in self-consciousness with knowing and willing and actualized by self-conscious action – while on the other hand self-consciousness has I the ethical realm its absolute foundation and the end which actuates its effort. Thus ethical life is the concept of freedom developed into the existing world and the nature of self-consciousness” (Hegel’s Philosophy of Right, 142). The ethical life is divided into 3 important parts; family, the civil society, and the …show more content…
On the other hand, the civil society and the state portion of the ethical life is more substantial. In regards to the former, civil society is a domain where individuals interact with one another through social means and other various methods, where it further corresponds to a “system of needs”. The civil society is a significant concept to Hegel’s ‘ethical life’, and as a result contains and represents three main things: the political economy, administration of justice and/or laws, and corporations. In regards to the political economy, civil society is the realm of the market economy, capitalism. It is the sphere which is dedicated to needs of individuals and the finding for the satisfaction of these needs. In other words, civil is the society is the realm where individuals pursue their private interests. (Hegel, 289). Furthermore, it is also the realm of necessity, in the sense that every individual is committed to the means of achieving the necessary means to secure their existence by attaining economic success. In other words, it is a sphere where there is a lot of competition amongst individuals’, which leads to not only struggle, but leads to a sphere where individuals are motivated to seek economic success.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Struggles with Awareness To be fully real, one must first be recognized by another person of equal or higher prestige in society. Only through proving one’s self, can such awareness be achieved. In a typical Hegelian struggle, two equal opponents face one another and battle for dominance. One will succeed and become the Master, and one will fall short to become the Bondsman.…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This text relates to the CIT question, “What does it mean to be human?” Merton reflected on his past and as a result, had a big readjustment in his values. Throughout life we are faced with many situations which shape us into the person we are. We must learn through our experiences; this is personal…

    • 352 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Politics and ethics are two vital components of a functioning society. When these two components are carefully balanced a sate/society can remain organized and fair to its citizens. In a realistic society the idea of what political ethics and human nature consist of varies, but in an idealistic society political ethics and human nature possess a common ground. Political ethics and human nature were a mutual understanding at some point but as societies grew, citizens began to think as individuals instead of as a collective. As a result of this self-serving behavior, inequality and the mistreatment of others quickly followed.…

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Arendt’s Freedom and Social Contract of Rousseau Freedom has been defined in many different ways by many different theorists. People in our modern world usually think of freedom as the ability to do what you want and to be treated as an equal to other people. In other words, these people are strong believers that everyone has free will. Not only to do what we want, but to be able to think and speak what we feel as well, without limitation. But the philosopher Hannah Arendt views this idea of freedom differently.…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Liberal Restriction

    • 252 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Of course, all liberals understand that the privileges of freedom are not unrestricted. A major restriction on the freedom of the individual is that using it should not interfere with the freedom of other individuals. I however, don’t this this is not a controversial restriction. I think the real restriction might come from the idea that although the lack of external coercion is accepted as necessary for freedom, coercion may also be internal. If individuals are affected by compulsion, addiction, irrational prejudices, or uncontrolled passions and if the choices they make are informed by ignorance, stupidity, manipulation, or propaganda, then they lack freedom as much as if they had experienced external coercion.…

    • 252 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What is freedom? How can we define it? Five authors: Patel, Plato, Mill, Marx and Le Guin write on topics such as this. Through analysis of their work freedom is better defined, and therefore challenged by what society has shown us over centuries. Three increasingly thought provoking questions on freedom remain: is freedom the ability to do whatever one wants?…

    • 1853 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Most ethical arguments do offer claims that can be taken as universally valid or true, there are circumstances when individual’s have to adhere to such position and at times turn to developing favorable as well as unfavorable feelings towards such argument. In other words one has to adjust towards the ideals promoted by the argument. When we analyze Arthur Mill’s work he offers an ethical argument as to what an ideal government ought to be and that needs to be taken as a universally accepted truth. In this case, Mill is against the monarchy forms of government. On that, he views them as where one man is viewed as superhuman being who may be having say divine mental power that he will use to govern the entire life of some mentally passive people.…

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    INTRODUCTION Underlying Adams’ quote is the important question as to whether society is progressive and has positive implications for humans, or whether its implications are negative and corrupting. Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Émile Durkheim are two political theorists who battle in their writing to determine what is bad and what is good about society. This essay will consider how progressive or corrupting society is and in what ways, according to Rousseau and Durkheim. The essay will explore Rousseau’s argument about the ‘chains’ of society, and look at Durkheim’s contrasting view of the value of community in society.…

    • 2119 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hegel’s philosophy of history incorporates his reasoning of how world history exists within the realm of the Spirit. He explores the actions of men and women, and concludes that they are driven by the Spirit. “Hence it is of interest, in the course of history, to learn to know spiritual nature in its existence, that is, the point where Spirit and Nature unite, namely, human nature” (Hartman). Hegel goes on to explain the purpose of human activity by using great men in world history and what drove them to carry out their purpose and goals. People that are driven to reach a goal, are the ones that are internally self-driven to accomplish great things in the world.…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    11 Hegel Antinomies Essay

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Freedom is therefore viewed for Hegel as a certain form of "self-relation" and "relationship with others" which is ultimately characterized as a state of "mutual recognition".13 This state of concretized freedom is rather one in which I identify myself with my projects and that they are experienced in me, as my own.14 It results, from the fact, that for Hegel, freedom as a concept needs to be concretely realized in one way or another. While Kant posited that freedom as uncaused causality was possible, and that this was the sufficient demand for freedom, Hegel's culminates by arguing that freedom is rather a state to be realized rather than one of uncaused…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hegel who is a German philosopher and an important figure of German idealism believes that consciousness of objects mention some awareness of self, as a subject, which is isolated from the recognized object. But Hegel argue that subjects are also objects when we look at the other subjects. In ‘the Phenomology of Spirit’, he tries to point out that self-consciousness is the awareness of another individual’s understanding of oneself. One of the most important pieces he wrote is called the dialectic of the master and slave. In today’s world, there are many social conflict that can be analyzed by the help of the perspective of Hegel’s master slave dialectic.…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Free will is a voluntary act and by definition, it is being able to act on one’s own beliefs and desires. The question of whether or not humans have free will is one that has been discussed for centuries. Do we, as humans, have the ability to act at one’s own discretion? Before getting into free will and all the topic has to offer, it is important to understand the topics of freedom and determinism. When we discus freedom, we usually discuss the idea that each and every person has control of their own mind and body.…

    • 1054 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The novel begins off with this idea of a dystopian world where the society, known as the World State, is based on this motto of "Community, Identity, and Stability." The engineered people of this society follow these qualities to the fullest extent. The procedure of this is achieved and maintained by the community of the people, however, the motto is arguable in the novel. In the Brave New World by Aldous Huxley, the idea of community, identity, and stability in the World State is proven to be wrong by the experiences of characters and the attempts to achieve their so-called "happiness" in society. All of society in the Brave New World is based on this thought of coming together as a community.…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    OPINION In the essay presented by Isaiah Berlin who argues in favour of negative freedom , in my opinion the concept of negative liberty has been tactfully interpreted so as to avoid it from losing the debate between positive and negative liberty. It is wrong of Berlin to suggest one can be free if the agent is not impeded by any physical obstacle, but that real freedom is both internal and external. I feel that those who defend the positive notion do not want to force others into our way of life, but simply to help others realize themselves so they can best utilize their negative freedom. These two concepts are not incompatible, but positive liberty goes beyond the goal of negative to argue that there must be more than just leaving people alone for them to truly be free.…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Humans are social animals and have since the beginning sought together to bear the burden of life, thus society was born through our nature. No matter how independent someone claims to be, they will always rely on the one persistent institution that defines them: the state. It is common knowledge that the state’s sole purpose is to benefit its present and future persons. It is by the people and for the people. This is because human instinct tells us we are more likely to reach our destination if we work together.…

    • 1027 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays