Isaiah Berlin's Argument In Favor Of Negative Freedom

Improved Essays
OPINION
In the essay presented by Isaiah Berlin who argues in favour of negative freedom , in my opinion the concept of negative liberty has been tactfully interpreted so as to avoid it from losing the debate between positive and negative liberty. It is wrong of Berlin to suggest one can be free if the agent is not impeded by any physical obstacle, but that real freedom is both internal and external.
I feel that those who defend the positive notion do not want to force others into our way of life, but simply to help others realize themselves so they can best utilize their negative freedom. These two concepts are not incompatible, but positive liberty goes beyond the goal of negative to argue that there must be more than just leaving people alone for them to truly be free. Therefore, I reject the notion that negative freedom is the ‘truer’ form. It is part of true freedom, but it is not necessary and sufficient.The concept of positive liberty is meaningful and direct. Again, a knowledgeable society is the only society that will be able to counter a government or other force that is limiting freedom by imposing a collectivized mentality and common-good that is untested
…show more content…
The idea of freedom as an opportunity concept is perfectly able to acknowledge that there are valuable and less valuable opportunities.the action of doing what you please does not necessarily constitute self-realization – human beings can have bad desires, they can even have desires they know to be bad themselves. Therefore, it very hard to hold the Berlinian position that a person can be free if they are being weighed down by internal, unhealthy desires – no matter how few physical constraints they

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Hard determinism arguing that life without free will is not bad, but, Accepting hard determinism is about inconceivable. It also argue that if people have freewill then, they do not have any moral responsibility and people were fully free to do anything. Nor is it clear that one could stop believing in free will (pg. 119-120). Whereas, libertarian is opposite to hard determinism and called indeterminism.…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If morals are only true in the cultural context they are found in then individuals have no need to strongly defend those morals. People only face the obligation to be moral in accordance to their cultural norms as long as these systems serve the people. Viewing morals as nothing more than cultural norms promotes tolerance towards foreign viewpoints because viewing one 's own moral perspective not as an absolute truth but rather as simply the way things are done around here cause there to be no need to firmly defend one 's morals. The undermining of moral confidence caused by relativism is not a defect of the theory but rather a benefit because moral confidence isn 't always a beneficial. Confidence in an ideal can lead to arrogance.…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Free Will Vs Determinism

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages

    A neutral stance to this is the claim that “ one can be held morally responsible for one’s actions only if one could have acted otherwise in a given set of circumstances.” (The Philosophical Review, page 440). Determinist would disagree with this claim because it is if an agent is never in control of the situations that they are forced into, how can they be morally responsible. Free will does not easily tie into the premise because if we choose our own action then we should be held morally reasonable for them, but if one said that “X” did Y because she/ he could it fails to prove moral responsibility and seems as if our action or arbitrary or random. However if an act is described as “not determined” or “uncaused” that means that free will cannot be used because the action is random therefore not in the agent’s power, thus making morally responsibility invalid. Simply, without the just the agent being the cause of an action, they cannot be held to moral…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    D’Holbach is on the Materialist side of the spectrum, whereas I fall on the Dualist side and therefore I can not agree with the view that human life is reduced to the physical brain and not the free soul. The problem with d’Holbach’s viewpoint on free will is that if there is no freedom of choice or free will, then there would be no meaning in our lives. Humanity would be diminished to existing as automatic machines subjected under the orders of external factors. But, humans do have a certain amount of freedom in the Compatibilist concept of free will. In d’Holbach’s concept of free will, all is condensed to the physical brain and subject only to external influences rather than a soul, and consciousness.…

    • 1345 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The meaning to be truly free is related to a good will. Freedom is not to do anything that you want. Freedom is also not to live concurring to a law designed by someone or something else. This is because what you “want” is obligated on you by strengths separate from yourself. Meaning, someone is given their wants and they are therefore not selected freely.…

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are more cases regarding those whose desires do not coincide with their self-interest and these contradict the theory of psychological egoism. In cases where a psychological egoists would claim that everyone would expect even just a little bit of benefit, does not take into account pessimistic people or people who know that the action will not benefit them at all (Shafer-Landau, 2015). Using sincere love as an example, the claim that our actions are motivated our strongest desire would not hold up because our self-interested desires would not be our priority; rather, you would want the other person to be happy even if it caused you pain (Jorati, 2014). There are times that people go after their own self-interest, however if they did it all the time, there would be no sense of morality. Even Shafer Landau (2015) states “If all we can do is look out for Number One, then there is little point in demanding we do otherwise.” (pg.104).…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    A statement of morality like this requires an explanation. Greene partially agrees with me. He offers forth the idea that impartiality is the more morally rational thing to do, but chases it with the caveat that it would not be rational to try and convince our culture that they should stop behaving as they do (Sommers, 300-301). That is to try to convince them that it is not the…

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    People who believe in positive freedom believe that they shouldn’t be able to make decisions for another human being since they do not know what is right or wrong for that individual. They believe that someone should be their true self as explained by Berlin, and they don’t believe in ignoring someone else’s…

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Negative freedom is the removal of interference that allows people to act in a way they believe is best for them. It is referred to as ‘negative’ freedom as it is the ‘absence of external restrictions’ on the individual (Heywood 2012:31). Removing interference of the state over the private lives of individuals is a form of negative freedom however it falls short as it does little to provide individuals with equality. This form of liberalism finds it difficult to answer critics concerns of structural inequalities that exist in society. Another form of freedom, that of positive freedom, goes some way in resolving this.…

    • 1119 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    One, instead, should be able to criticize the beliefs of others. James is correct in claiming that one should use their will when forming certain beliefs; but contrary to what he thinks, this process does not lead to the maximization of true beliefs. Preconceptions heavily influence what one wills to believe. If these preconceptions are tainted by false knowledge, formation of new true beliefs becomes difficult. James’ theory would be effective at creating many new beliefs but his process does not emphasize the creation of true beliefs, as he desires.…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays