Determinism Vs Compatibilism

Improved Essays
Free will is a voluntary act and by definition, it is being able to act on one’s own beliefs and desires. The question of whether or not humans have free will is one that has been discussed for centuries. Do we, as humans, have the ability to act at one’s own discretion? Before getting into free will and all the topic has to offer, it is important to understand the topics of freedom and determinism. When we discus freedom, we usually discuss the idea that each and every person has control of their own mind and body. With this, a person is allowed to do whatever he or she wants, legally, as long as he or she does not harm or oblige another person against their own will. Philosophers ask many questions pertaining to freedom which consist of …show more content…
Soft determinism, also known as compatibilism and self-determinism, is the theory that determinism is true and that it is also compatible with freedom and responsibility. In other words, our actions are free when we ourselves are the causes of those actions. We act based on our desires, wants, and intentions, therefore our actions are considered free because we act based on our choices rather than external forces. Keep in mind that just because a person’s actions are acted out by their choices rather than external factors, does not mean that what a person wants is not determined by those external forces. Extrinsic coercion determines what a person desires, but as long as their actions are constant with their choices, their actions will always be considered …show more content…
Although I agree with this theory, I disagree with the statement “same past, same future.” For the most part, a person’s past experiences will have a major influence on what a person does or does not do. These experiences are what shape us into the people we are today and with that, it is difficult to say that those experiences would not have any effect on how we go about our beliefs and desires. Extrinsic factors do in fact play a role in a person’s desires and intentions, but a person is not always going to act based off of those factors. This is where the libertarian statement comes in, “same past, different future.” Based off prior experiences that we have come across within our lifetime, we as humans have the time to reflect and figure out how we want to act out our beliefs and desires. Whether the actions a person takes are necessary or unnecessary depending on the situation, is truly based off of their better judgement. Not everyone will have a “better judgement” when it comes to making decisions, but that is where the personal responsibility from soft determinism comes in. There are always going to be consequences for any bad choices a person makes and everyone is going to be responsible for their actions whether those actions are good or

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Lastly, Compatibilism or soft determinism believes that that all actions have a cause and that free will is compatible with determinism. Compatibilists according to scientist believe that freedom can be present or absent in situations for other reasons and has nothing to do with the logics behind it. Ultimately, free will exist despite the help from…

    • 1628 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If determinism is true, then it is impossible for a person to have free will because a person that could not act otherwise than he did does not act freely. This view is also known as incompatibilism. However, according to a soft determinist, one who believes that humans are determined and still free, the first mistake about the argument of incompatibilism is that freedom and determinism oppose each other. Soft determinists believe that determinism conflicts with freedom because of the misconception of freedom.…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Human behaviors, actions, desires and memories are all subjects that are discussed in everyday philosophy. Philosophy is defined as the study of the fundamental nature of knowledge, reality, and existence. Philosophy has a lot to do with the future. When it comes to philosophy the future is already set and no one knows what will happen until the time comes and that is called hard determinism. Hard determinism is a theory that human behavior and actions are determined by external factors, and therefore humans do not have genuine free will or ethical accountability.…

    • 1821 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this article, W.T Stace defends the view of compatibilism, which is also known as “soft determinism.” He argues that every event in one’s life is inevitable and is the result of past affairs, which also leads him to the belief that free will is indeed consistent with determinism. Near the end of the article he also explores the notion of moral responsibility and it’s compatibility with free will. Stace begins by briefly outlining the significance of free will because if someone has no control over their actions how can they be punished or rewarded for the way the act? He believes that many people entirely deny the concept of free will.…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The problem of free will has and will continue to be discussed as it is near impossible for any one side to prove that their view is the correct one. Due to this, they can only discuss why theirs would be the most logical possibility within the grounds of reality. With this said, I believe that my view of compatibilism within the problem of free will is in fact, a logical possibility. I believe compatibilism is a logical possibility because I believe there are rarely situations in which topics/arguments are so one sided; and that the truth is usually a mix between varies sides. My view of compatibilism encompasses this idea because both determinism and free will are in play simultaneously by having causes produce a variety of predetermined…

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the matter of free will indeterminism and libertarianism provide for the existence of such an idea. Although both account for free actions beings those in which were chosen from an array of choices that also could have been made, there is a subtle distinction between the two. The former suggests that some actions are not determined but rather due to randomness or chance and the latter suggests that those actions which are not determined are the result of free will (Chaffee 161). William James' modest perspective of libertarianism claims that because people seek to better themselves and the world around them and seek out morality proves the existence of free will. He believed that we live in a world of possibilities in which the future cannot be predicted or otherwise known until it happens.…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Soft determinism was coined by philosopher William James. Soft determinist believe that human freedom and determinism are compatible positions. Soft determinist are also known as compatibilists who believe in combatilism. They feel that the determinism argument is true, but they refuse to give up on the idea of human freedom and responsibility. The problem soft determinists face is the idea that life and our actions can be both predetermined to an extent but also be factored by freewill and…

    • 1642 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I have gained knowledge pertaining the connections and differences between the concepts of free will, determinism, indeterminism, compatibilism, and fatalism as well. Now, I can distinguish between them clearly and I have a good background regarding these concepts. The first thing I have learned is about the contemporary philosophical language in utilizing the concept of compatibilism as big category instead of soft determinism or hard determinism. The concept of compatibilism is crucial to avoid the confusion and keep things straight in our mind.…

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I would concur that individuals can settle on decisions that shape their lives, but at the same time, individuals align their beliefs with society and therefore, a person's conduct can impact others despite the how insignificant they can be. I believe that an individual’s actions and mindset is influenced by a combination of what is learned from passed events and the environment they live in, and how we act upon circumstances. Determinism can be boiled down to an individual's behavior being explained to be affected by surrounding influences, and that seems more tangible than free will, and believing that an individual has the ability to make most of their own decisions without any outside influences.…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cahn's Argument Analysis

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Soft determinists still believe in a predetermined world, but contrary to a hard determinist, a soft determinist believes that free will does exist. Soft determinists argue free will on the language that it is used. An example used is of a person walking down the street, where the person is not sleep walking or being pushed, but instead acting on his or her own accord. That person is walking because he or she chooses to, not by force. Cahn states “even if the action is one link in a casual chain… nevertheless I am free with regard to that action, for I wish to perform it, and if I did not wish to, I would not do so" (174).…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper, I argue that Ayer’s reasoning of compatibilism is false. The reason this is true is because his explanation and reasonings of the topic are completely contradictory. Throughout the essay, I will call into question what Ayer believes to be true, while at the same time, try to “take a walk in his shoes,” to see where he is coming from and to dig deeper into why Ayer believes his theories on the topic are correct. Ayer holds the belief that free will and determinism can both be true at the same time. He states his belief of free will as when, “it is implied that I could have acted otherwise,” and believed that I could have acted otherwise, then i am said to be morally responsible for what i have done (Ayer).…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This philosophical question is still not unsolved, but in this essay I will argue that a freedom of choice cannot be had by an agent in a deterministic world. Determinism thesis states that all events in the universe are determined by previous events. In determinism, every even is determined to happen by the laws of the the system.it is assumed that once the laws are set and the systems are decided, everyone following the event in the system is also decided. This assumption proves that humans are not free to chose how they act, but are determined by prior events over which they have no control over. The freedom that is precluded by determinism is the freedom to act without recourse to prior events, which means not having a choice determined and is able to act many different ways in any situation regardless of the cause.…

    • 1305 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For instance, you turn on the faucet in your house to get a glass of water. The event of turning on the faucet was caused because you had a sudden desire to drink some water. A hard determinist would say that you had no choice and that you were always going to get that glass of water, a soft determinist would say that while an event had caused you to get the water you still freely chose to get up and fill your glass with water. One of the main arguments against soft determinism is that it is an inherently flawed argument because soft determinists change the definition of free will to make it compatible with determinism. In Cahn’s “Freedom or Determinism” he discusses how the definition of free will differs between a soft determinist and a hard determinist.…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Free Will Vs. Determinism

    • 2021 Words
    • 9 Pages

    A large and important topic in philosophy is the idea of what us, as humans, are in control of throughout our lives. Are we in control of every moment in our life, or is our life completely mapped out for us. This question leads us to two critical terms used by philosophers, free will and determinism. I will analyze these two theories and discuss different viewpoints that philosophers have regarding free will and determinism. I will explain how they interact with one another in an attempt to confirm my belief that yes, we have free will even if determinism is true.…

    • 2021 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Free Will and Determinism have been discussed by philosophers for many years. Free will is associated with moral responsibility, and alternative actions that “could have” been taken over the one chosen. Determinism is the opposite view, and is associated with universal causation, and a lack of free will. Determinists believe that a person’s actions are inevitable, they are dictated by a person’s experiences, they believe nurture, nature, and even a person’s genes determine their future actions. Because of this determinists believe people hold no moral responsibility for their actions.…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays