Hegel therefore believes that the Kantian antinomies therefore have to be replaced with a syllogism that does not depend on transcendental idealism. Rather than viewing the unconditioned as provided by reason as an extension subservient to the categories of the understanding, Hegel proposes that both, by themselves are inadequate. He proposes instead that they neither have truth in themselves and that only through the understanding's and reason's sublation and their manifestation as concrete, can the resulting concepts possess any real truth.11 Hegel therefore criticizes the transcendental dialectic in order to lead to his own dialectic.
It is from this critique of the antinomies in general, that Hegel criticizes the antinomy concerning freedom, which Hegel views as a conflict between self-determination and determinism.12 Rather than the arguments for the possibility of freedom and absolute necessity being self-sufficiently true and then cancelling each other out, Hegel proposes that the concept of freedom unifies both tradition libertarian and traditional compatibilist arguments in order to exist as a whole. This is not a …show more content…
Freedom is therefore viewed for Hegel as a certain form of "self-relation" and "relationship with others" which is ultimately characterized as a state of "mutual recognition".13 This state of concretized freedom is rather one in which I identify myself with my projects and that they are experienced in me, as my own.14 It results, from the fact, that for Hegel, freedom as a concept needs to be concretely realized in one way or another. While Kant posited that freedom as uncaused causality was possible, and that this was the sufficient demand for freedom, Hegel's culminates by arguing that freedom is rather a state to be realized rather than one of uncaused
It is from this critique of the antinomies in general, that Hegel criticizes the antinomy concerning freedom, which Hegel views as a conflict between self-determination and determinism.12 Rather than the arguments for the possibility of freedom and absolute necessity being self-sufficiently true and then cancelling each other out, Hegel proposes that the concept of freedom unifies both tradition libertarian and traditional compatibilist arguments in order to exist as a whole. This is not a …show more content…
Freedom is therefore viewed for Hegel as a certain form of "self-relation" and "relationship with others" which is ultimately characterized as a state of "mutual recognition".13 This state of concretized freedom is rather one in which I identify myself with my projects and that they are experienced in me, as my own.14 It results, from the fact, that for Hegel, freedom as a concept needs to be concretely realized in one way or another. While Kant posited that freedom as uncaused causality was possible, and that this was the sufficient demand for freedom, Hegel's culminates by arguing that freedom is rather a state to be realized rather than one of uncaused