On Liberty By Patel, Plato Marx And Le Guin

Improved Essays
What is freedom? How can we define it? Five authors: Patel, Plato, Mill, Marx and Le Guin write on topics such as this. Through analysis of their work freedom is better defined, and therefore challenged by what society has shown us over centuries. Three increasingly thought provoking questions on freedom remain: is freedom the ability to do whatever one wants? Do certain qualities, lifestyles, morals or even physical characteristics determine who is free? And finally, how do we progress in the name of freedom through society and its members? Patel, Plato, Mill, Marx and Le Guin offer insight, and possible solutions to such pressing questions. Mill stated that his book On Liberty is “about the importance, to man and society, of a large …show more content…
Mill argued that popular belief does not always mean correct. In order for a society to be successful everyone must realize this, both the rulers and the ruled. Instead of a tyrant stealing from and fighting against the people which he rules over, the tyrant must act out of benevolence towards the citizens in society. This concept can be applied to the upper class towards the lower class as well, instead of one being seen as superior to the other, they must work together to progress. Eboo Patel’s movement is bringing together people of all walks of life together in order to get surpass stereotypes, oppression and discrimination. The tyranny arises from such things, and drags down those in the society. In order for progress to occur, everyone must acknowledge this. Patel recognized the power difference between individuals can bring upon a society. This society can become the perfect society that Plato dreamed of in his republic. He said that if everyone did what was right in their eyes, there would be no need for laws. Does this include all in a society? One wouldn’t think so, since every city or town seems to have criminals. These people are seen as less, much like how Mill views them. They need to be shown the right way to do things guided by reason. He expresses that the perfect state would be under the rule reason, in this case he thought it should be a philosopher. These great thinkers are found in each generation, so education is necessary to progress as a society. Plato recognized

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    “For to be free is not merely to cast off one’s chains, but to live in a way that respects and enhances the freedom of others. ”- Nelson Mandela. The definition and laws of freedom have changed over the many year’s arguments and wars have broken out over it. But there has and always been a selection of voices that stand out and change our perception of freedom and its values for the better of everyone on this earth or sometimes for the worst.…

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Elvis Rodriguez Fall 2015 Civil Liberties Final Freedom is a condition in which people have the “opportunity” to speak act and try to pursue happiness without any unnecessary restrictions. Freedom is important because it leads to expressions of original thought, increased creativity and a high quality of life. The idea of freedom is complex and it’s not so easy to understand. In the United States “essential” freedom are “guaranteed” by the Bill of Rights, a part of the constitution.…

    • 1627 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Freedom. The power or right to act, speak, or think as one wants without hindrance or restraint. It might be a matter of course for us to enjoy this. However, to the people who lived from 15th to 19th century, freedom was something they aspired most. From now on, I'm going to talk about a woman who achieved this by herself.…

    • 228 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Freedom The idea of freedom can be seen in collection 2 of our textbook. Freedom is shown in the Speech I Have a Dream by Martin Luther King Jr.…

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    All of their actions are a ‘matter of common concern’ and affect the society as a whole (Hobhouse, 1911:120). In this sense, the author argues with Mill’s “Harm Principle”, as Mill claimed that ‘the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others’ (Mill,1859:14). In contrast to that, Hobhouse suggested that there is no aspect of the life of an individual which is indifferent to the society and can be ignored. According to his beliefs, “humanity lies deeper than all distinctions of rank, and class, and colour … and of sex” (Hobhouse,1911:121). This means that there have to be certain conditions in the society of human growth, as “the foundation of liberty is the idea of growth”(Hobhouse,1911:122).…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    He believes that tyranny of the majority may allow society to infringe on individual freedom will lead to conformity and oppresses and threatens an individual’s freedom, helping it to promote social censorship. For example, Mill stated that tyranny of the majority is more horrible than political oppression because it will affect and permeate people’s lives more, (Mill, Pg. 4) This shows that regular people such as family, friends, colleagues, and classmates will have more of a direct impact on an individual than people at the political or national level, showing that it is not the government or society that needs to be in check, but the other individuals or group of people that are harming the individual. Mill explains that people who wants freedom from social tyranny has to resist social conformity and moral behaviors that does not fit with their ideals, beliefs, or lifestyles, in which society at this point is a tyrant that enslaves the soul. Protection must be made on the basis of principle and can only stop if the individual do harm to society…

    • 1913 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mill saw the problem with modern society as resulting from the power of both the tyranny of the majority but also the tyranny of public opinion. He believed that public opinion had grown too strong to the point where “At present individuals are lost in the crowd. In politics it is almost a triviality to say that public opinion now rules the world.” (On Liberty, chapter III). The “lost in the crowd” metaphor is a powerful one that illustrates Mill’s view.…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Freedom is the power to express yourself without being restricted. Our society has an erroneous definition of freedom, since we are not free. As citizens we are tight to certain laws that control the way we act. Frederick Douglass once acknowledged that knowledge is valuable because it is the key to freedom.…

    • 391 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First the citizens must give themselves up to the law of the society, they must allow restrictions and limits to be placed upon them for the society to run effectively. Secondly the citizens must put themselves under the protection of the society and trust that they will be defended and taken care of. When this trust is given to the society and the government then they can effectively protect and ensure “the peace, safety, and public good of the people. This is contrary to what Mill would argue as he does not believe citizens should submit themselves to society and give away their rights. He believes that as an individual citizen you should fight for your opinion and never give into society.…

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    He states, “In all such cases there should be personal freedom, legal and social, to do the action and stand the consequences” (Mill, 64). But, in defining freedom, as expressed earlier,…

    • 1838 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    This opinion incites rage in them and evidently they might act violently to others (e.g. towards the corn dealer) (Mill 52). In these situations, is important to recognize that it is not the entirety of the opinion that one must pay attention to, but the context in which the opinion is shared. For the benefit of all Mill’s writes, “the liberty of the individual must thus far be limited; he must not make himself a nuisance to other people. But if he refrains from molesting others in what concerns them,…

    • 2454 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are various definitions of what freedom means. Each individual has his own understanding of the word freedom. Freedom is having the right to experience your opinion and to live life in a manner consist with your beliefs and interests without judgement from others. Many people may say that freedom is about being accepted as well. This understanding of freedom is demonstrated in the short story “The Strangers That Came to Town” by Ambrose Flack.…

    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mill Vs Rousseau Analysis

    • 1418 Words
    • 6 Pages

    John Stuart Mill the liberal and Jean-Jacques Rousseau the republican, are two political philosophers whom focussed on the integration of political liberty with the relationship found between that of the individual, society and the state by the means of power or authority. Both of these political thinkers formed their arguments in their writings, namely; On Liberty (1859) by Mill, and The Social Contract (1913) by Rousseau. On a more specific scale, their views differed in much contrast, whereby Rousseau claims that people and individuals of society may only acquire the entity of freedom through a transitioning process from the natural state to the civil state, whereby they would have to conform to the general will as the common good. On the…

    • 1418 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “Freeing yourself was one thing, claiming ownership of that freed self was another.” Freedom is the state of being free or at liberty, rather than in confinement or under physical restraint. Since birth, we learn to adapt into a life of restrictions and limitations. Although some countries are considered to be ‘free’, we are still bound by the oppressive chains of society and government. We follow the rules and if we choose to be disobedient we suffer the consequences.…

    • 1385 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Knowledge – The Key to the Locked Door of Freedom The Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass and The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn both suggest that knowledge is the key to freedom. Freedom means something different to each and every one of us. For the most part, freedom applies to rights, religion, speech, or just plainly to be all that you can be. Without those core fundamentals of freedom, one’s hands are tied to try and become most anything.…

    • 1569 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays