This “act of treachery against god” is breaking the covenant relationship with God since “any king other than YHWH is an intruder into the pristine covenant relationship” with his people. Levenson makes the point that, “Israel as a nation and the Israelites as an individual stand in the position of royal vassals of the divine suzerain.” This is interpreted to mean that by creating a relationship with the human king, the people of Jerusalem break the contract previously made with God by creating a new one with a mortal king. The form of the contract takes one of suzerainty, with the Israelites being vassals to only one divine king. The very notion of wanting a king other than God results in God’s disappointment and grieving in the face of rejection. In the view of God, he literally created the people and redeemed them with the Sinai covenant and as such has valid claim to be their only king, yet the people treat him with disrespect by searching for someone who could do
This “act of treachery against god” is breaking the covenant relationship with God since “any king other than YHWH is an intruder into the pristine covenant relationship” with his people. Levenson makes the point that, “Israel as a nation and the Israelites as an individual stand in the position of royal vassals of the divine suzerain.” This is interpreted to mean that by creating a relationship with the human king, the people of Jerusalem break the contract previously made with God by creating a new one with a mortal king. The form of the contract takes one of suzerainty, with the Israelites being vassals to only one divine king. The very notion of wanting a king other than God results in God’s disappointment and grieving in the face of rejection. In the view of God, he literally created the people and redeemed them with the Sinai covenant and as such has valid claim to be their only king, yet the people treat him with disrespect by searching for someone who could do