Happiness in Nicomachean Ethics and Living the Rule of St. Benedict Today
From pursuing pleasure to avoiding pain, life seems to ultimately be about achieving happiness. However, how to define and obtain happiness has and continues to be a widely debated issue. In
Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle gives his view on happiness. According to
Aristotle, different types of people pursue different ends. “The many,” or ordinary people, pursue pleasure, whereas politicians seek glory. However, people of superior refinement seek happiness. Happiness is the highest goal because it is an end desired entirely for its own sake, and it is selfsufficient.
In order to define happiness, the function of man must be considered.
Aristotle says that what makes man unique is his ability to …show more content…
An alternate view of happiness is found in Joan D. Chittister’s Living the
Rule of St. Benedict Today. According to Chittister, Benedict’s Rule is a guideline for ordinary people. Unlike Aristotle, who believed that only the superior seek happiness, Chittister says that anyone can attain spirituality and happiness. One of the main ways to achieve happiness, according to
Chittister, is by working. While Aristotle says that the ability to reason makes us human, Chittister says that working makes us more human.
Furthermore, unlike Aristotle, in Living the Rule of St. Benedict Today,
Chittister minimizes the need for contemplation and maximizes the importance of work: “Adam was put in the garden to till it and to keep it, not to contemplate it.” This statement clearly flies in the face of Aristotle’s belief in the importance of contemplation. However, like Aristotle,
Chittister believes that work needs to be pursued as a mean between the extremes of workaholism