Formal Analysis of Galatea 2.2 Essay example

1003 Words 5 Pages
Formal Analysis of Galatea 2.2

The novel became important in 19th century as the middle-class became more educated and desired entertainment. With the coming of 20th century and its sophisticated technologies, the form of the novel expanded to include science fiction: a genre that combines mankind's awe of new technology and the age-old attribute of fantasy. Writers of science fiction found it necessary to employ the traditional style of the novel in their modern works. This is one of the main points in Richard Powers' "Galatea 2.2". He combines realism of the traditional English novel with fantasy of the future world.

"Galatea 2.2"’s fantastic is not a concrete one: the fictional plan appears here to be natural. As an
…show more content…
But let's return to the novel itself. As we read the beginning and ending of the novel, we find it to be circular in structure. It uses time as the unifying element between paragraphs. "I lost my thirty-fifth year. [...] My other years persists [...] Each year is a difficult love [...]" (3). At the end of the narrative, this discussion returns, but this time is in the dialogical form: "How old are you?" (Lentz), "Thirty six" (Powers) (328). We can hear the echo of time (age) throughout the entire novel. Age is an important element for Artificial Intelligence. It grows from A all the way to H, finally saying that "Helen [was] far too old" (326). It seems that through the time or age element, Powers wants to suggest the passing of time: from past to future, where Artificial Intelligence will not be innovation, but it will be "far too old". It is time that makes this smooth connection between reality and fantasy.

It is also time that makes a transformation in Powers during his relationship with C., Helen and then later with A. When we read the text more closely at the end of the novel, we will not see the twenty-one year old teacher in love with his student C. We see now an adult who knows that life is not only successful writing, but also is deception (C., then A.), sickness (Audrey) and death (for example his father's death, then the death of his teacher, Taylor). His manner, his way of speaking and also his way of thinking changed. Yes, he is still

Related Documents