William The Conqueror Analysis

Improved Essays
Show More
The sources are beneficial in terms of learning how military of Normandy worked and they give an insight of the character of William the Conqueror. All three sources, were about the invasion of England by William the Conqueror. The Medieval sourcebook tells us the battle between English King Harold and Duke William of Normandy. It portrayed image of hardworking soldiers and the leader which conquered a country. The Anglo-Saxon Chronicle: Assessment of William I, is more about what kind of a man William was, intelligent and significant. The Bayeux Tapestry, on the other hand, shows a visual art of what actually happened and more of Norman’s point of view, how they prepared for the invasion. From all three sources we can understand that the military of Normandy was strong and William the Conqueror was portrayed as cold; however, at the same time, brave and intuitive man.
In The Anglo-Saxon Chronicle: Assessment of William I, King William is …show more content…
At that time, England’s authority was in Normans hands and the ruler was son of William, Henry I. The source portrays both William the Conqueror and King Harold as courageous and significant. Malmesbury tries to mark that while English became soft and unprepared, the Normans worked on their military and process of success. The Normans had communion, a Christian festival recognizing Jesus' Last Dinner before his execution. He utilized this reality to bring up that the Normans were get ready for the up and coming fight, while the English squandered their energies celebrating. Some medieval history specialists may have guaranteed that the Normans won since God was on their side; Malmesbury, by difference, recommended that the Normans won as a result of their genuine mentality. His talk of the circumstances and end results relations overseeing the result of the fight uncovers the brain of a genuine history

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Battle Of Bouvines Essay
    • 1753 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Battle Of Bouvines Essay

    The Magna Carta was part of a counter-revolution against the image of a ‘Golden Age’ of Edward the Confessor and William the Conqueror’s support of the cultural reforms of Harold’s predecessor. A growing and powerful move by Norman Barons, many of whose families had held English lands before the Norman Conquest and who now sought to eradicate the memory of Anglo Saxon rule, creating a Norman alternative to the saintly Confessor, based around the strong but decentralised rule of Henry I.…

    • 1753 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Bayeux Tapestry
    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Bayeux Tapestry

    The 14th of October 1066 began one of history’s most memorable battles to ever be recorded. All thanks to an incredible piece of artwork called The Bayeux Tapestry. The Tapestry tells a story of events leading up to The Battle of Hastings. In such remarkable detail that it 's mostly why the battle is still known so well even today. Its thanks to that very detail that we can better understand the factors that contributed to Harold Godwinsons loss to the Normans. Did a simple mistake cost hime all of England? Could it have been prevented? Or was it as William thought “divine intervention” (Howarth,167).…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    An Analysis Of An Ideal King In Shakespeare's Henry IV
    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages

    An Analysis Of An Ideal King In Shakespeare's Henry IV

    When Hal makes his promise to his father that he will end the rebellion, William Shakespeare tells his audiences that the prince starts his transformation to become an ideal king in Henry IV, Part 1. These lines illustrated Hal’s plan to become an ideal king with some concrete steps, such as meeting Hotspur on the battlefield and washing his shame with the blood on his face. It is hard to believe that a prince who spends all his time with highwaymen can come up with a serious plan and quickly identify a chance to express it to the king. Moreover, Hal is given a variety of options to start his transformation to become an ideal king, but his response indicates that he will only achieve this goal by regaining his “honor” on the battlefield. What are the factors contribute to Hal’s decision to make this promise and how do they reflect the “honor” that Hal is trying to obtain? It seems like the prince has a general direction to pursue his “honor” and some sort of stimulation push him to make this particular resolution. As Shakespeare guides his audiences to the…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    In The Court Of The Conqueror Analysis
    • 1027 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In The Court Of The Conqueror Analysis

    Imagine a world where there weren’t consequences to the decisions that have been made regarding the “discovery” of the Americas and the unethical treatment made towards the Native Americans. Would the indigenous people have more rights? Would they be more successful as a nation now without the involvement of the white man? Surely the answer would be yes, however it is too late to ask ourselves questions like that. This essay will look at two court cases described in Walter Echo-Hawk’s book, In the Courts of the Conqueror, a book that details ten of the most negatively impactful court cases in Unites States history regarding the treatment of Native Americans and how they are still being impacted to this very day by the rulings of those cases.…

    • 1027 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Bayeux Tapestry Research Paper
    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Bayeux Tapestry Research Paper

    The original Bayeux Tapestry has 626 people, 190 horses and mules, 35 dogs, 506 other birds and animals, 33 buildings, 37 ships and 37 trees or groups and trees, and 57 Latin inscriptions. The borders of the tapestry are filled with mythological figures, lions, dragons, and scenes from fables. As we know the main character of the tapestry is William the Conqueror. From looking at the pictures on the tapestry we can tell about life during the time of the invasion. We can see what weapons and amour and horse tack were used, what happened at the battle, what Norman ships were like and what they were used for. We can see that they moved men and horses. Spears, axes bows and sword were used in the tapestry. The horses were carried by boats to battle. We can see the eleventh-century carpentry was like by looking at the scenes of ship-building and what hairstyle people had and the way they dressed. Hair styles in the Bayeux Tapestry are used to differentiate between Englishmen and the Normans/French. The shaved heads behind the ears is typically Norman. The Englishmen are universally long-haired, and most sport mustaches; some later portrayed with beards as well. We can see on the tapestry that the Norman knights had horses unlike the English who were on foot. The Normans had an advantage by using horses in the battle.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Battle Of Agincourt Analysis
    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Battle Of Agincourt Analysis

    The Spanish were feeling confident about their chances and, in the words of Keegan, were “certain of victory” (94). Yet even an army of at least 20,000 men with strong beliefs that they would win fell to an English army half of the Flanders’ size. This was due to the emotional state of the English Army – one that highly valued honor and spiritual commitment. Before the Battle Agincourt had even begun, the English Army turned to spiritual rejuvenation above all else, confessing their sins and attending mass prior to dressing for war (Keegan 82). This prioritization of emotional assurance among the English not only achieved unity under God but under their King who set the standard for religious devotion, two aspects not seen in the Army of Flanders. Henry V was found participating in “Mass three times in succession before the battle, and took Communion, as presumably did most of his followers” (Keegan 114). Additionally, the presence of Henry created a feeling of honor within his own ranks. This differs from creating a culture of honor between the English and the Spanish, a task the English King failed to accomplish once he ordered his Spanish prisoners to be executed. Nonetheless, once soldiers witnessed their King “visible to all and ostentatiously risking his life in the heart of the mêlée”, the honor Henry expressed was desirous of all (Keegan 114). An army of 8,000 archers and 2,000 men-in-arms who were weary and surviving off of nuts and berries during the battle (Keegan 89) wouldn’t have been able to defeat the 20,000 strong Army of Flanders without the instilled desire to fight for one another and their cause of the Hundred Years’ War. Not only this, but the atmosphere of honor provided the additional feeling of seriousness among the English Army, an emotion that couldn’t be…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    1066 The Year Of The Conquest Analysis
    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages

    1066 The Year Of The Conquest Analysis

    1066: The Year of the Conquest is a book by David Howarth trying to express the year 1066 through its battles. Specifically, the peace that the battles disrupted and the people involved such as the dukes, kings, earls, nobles, and the commoners. His goal is not to provide facts on what happened, his goal is to show his readers- whether they are scholars or those who enjoy history- the drama that unfolded that year, with as many reliable sources as possible. Howarth describes the year by referencing the “Bayeux tapestry, the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, The Carmen, Hastingae Proelio, Gesta Guillielmi, the Domesday, De Gestis Regum Anglorum Vita Wulfstani, and Historia Ecclesiastica” (Howarth, sources page). Howarth wrote this with as little bias as he could as he mentioned in his introduction and revealed to us the driving questions that prodded him to write this story.…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    King Arthur: Annotated Bibliography
    • 116 Words
    • 1 Pages

    King Arthur: Annotated Bibliography

    "King Arthur Biography. " Bio.com. A&E Networks Television, 3 Aug. 2016. Web. 03 Aug. 2016.…

    • 116 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Medieval Battels
    • 2089 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Medieval Battels

    One of the most famous medieval battles was the battle of Hastings, in which William the conqueror of France defeated King Harold of England, this…

    • 2089 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    King Henry V: A Good Christian King
    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages

    King Henry V: A Good Christian King

    He led his men in exceeding faith; he empowered his men with the strength of God, they stood fearlessly and wiped the French on the Agincourt’s field. They faced minimal losses, and won. Could Henry V be a bad Christian king and win out of such enormous odds, stacked up against him? No is the answer, for He was outnumbered 4 to 1, his men were mostly Yale men not cavalry like the French Knights he was facing were. The English were tired, sick and had been on campaign for a long time unlike the fresh and ready French and King Henry was still able to beat the French. This proves Henry as an honorable candidate for a good Christian…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Philip Of Macedon Vs Alexander The Great Essay
    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Philip Of Macedon Vs Alexander The Great Essay

    Although no two events are exactly the same, there are many instances in history that are very similar. History does not repeat itself in a perfect sequence, but over time similarities can be seen throughout different events. Two events that are very similar are the rise of Philip of Macedon and the rise of Alexander the Great. Although these two individuals are related, they both led similar events. Philip of Macedon was ignored when he began to show power (though forewarned), as well as Alexander the Great who was not taken seriously from the beginning.…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Henry V Changing Tides
    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Henry V Changing Tides

    Henry V is full of confusion and changing tides. The play opens up with the king Henry V who used to be the wild Prince Hal in Pt. 1 of Henry IV, but now he is a valiant and aggressive monarch who does what is “right” for his English nation. History goes back and forth between who should rightfully have the French crown: the English or the French? The English army also fluctuates between honorable men fighting a glorious war and those who are fearful and doubtful of the war’s necessity. Is this war glorious or exemplary of the horrors and ugliness of war? Both of these battles are fought and won with words.…

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander The Great Literary Analysis
    • 1069 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Alexander The Great Literary Analysis

    Stories are often reshaped in order to for different people, religions, and cultures to relate, but it can be assumed that not any as much as the tale of Alexander the Great. Alexander the Great was crowned king at twenty years old after his fathers’ death, and for most of his kingship, he traveled on a military campaign in hopes of conquering all of the known world. Considering the tale of Alexander the Great is so prevalent throughout the world, many have molded it to fit their own cultures because of his powerfulness. Therefore, problematizing dichotomies of the East and West differ throughout each version. Richard Stoneman’s, translation of the Pseudo-Callisthenes focuses on Alexander the Great’s domination from Greece to Africa and Asia.…

    • 1069 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Battle Of Agincourt: A Narrative Analysis
    • 1750 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Battle Of Agincourt: A Narrative Analysis

    It is true that there are some differences in the accounts. According to de Wavrin, before Henry V even made it to the French coast, a fire broke out among his fleet and destroyed three large ships (de Wavrin 183-184). The account by de Monstrelet failed to mention this event. It is uncertain if he simply was not aware or if he deemed it not worthy of note. According to de Wavrin, the fleet that left England numbered eight hundred ships (de Wavrin 184). According to de Monstrelet, the fleet numbered one thousand and six hundred ships (de Monstrelet 332). According to de Wavrin, in regards to the number of men that left England, “they numbered, as it was then said, about twenty thousand fighting men, of whom more than ten thousand were archers” (de Wavrin 181). According to de Monstrelet, in regards to the same matter, “The kings army was composed of about six thousand helmets and twenty-three thousand archers” (de Monstrelet 332). Neither account states from where the chroniclers got these numbers for the English army before they left England. According to de Wavrin, during the night before the battle, when both sides lodged in adjacent villages, the English were silent and the French were loud (de Wavrin 201). However, according to de Monstrelet, on that same night, the English were the ones who were boisterous…

    • 1750 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Shakespeare And Branagh's Adaptation Of Henry V
    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Shakespeare And Branagh's Adaptation Of Henry V

    Shakespeare’s representation of Henry V shaped war as patriotic and courageous, attributed primarily to the previous success of England in the Hundred Years’ War. In order to emphasise the triumph of nationalism war achieves, Shakespeare shaped Henry as a rousing and inspirational character preceding the Battle of Agincourt. Henry proclaims his outlook on war as he asserts, “But he’ll remember with advantages, what feats he did that day.” The effective foreshadowing incorporated by Shakespeare enabled Henry to project the fulfilment his troops would attain through partaking in such battle, thus communicating to his audience the significance of war in gaining such pride. Shakespeare continues to emphasise the patriotic sense of war through Henry by signifying the familial relationship formed as a result. As reflected in his speech, Henry proclaims, “We few, we happy few, we band of brothers.” Through the effective incorporation of emotive language and the rule of thirds, Shakespeare effectively reiterates the united brotherhood war enabled, thus persuading his troops and his audience implicitly to perceive war as an embodiment of pride and courage. These language devices utilised by Shakespeare in the St Crispin’s Day Speech portray his perception of war as patriotic, clearly an embodiment of the success granted during the Elizabethan…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2023 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings