1066 The Year Of The Conquest Analysis

Improved Essays
1066: The Year of the Conquest is a book by David Howarth trying to express the year 1066 through its battles. Specifically, the peace that the battles disrupted and the people involved such as the dukes, kings, earls, nobles, and the commoners. His goal is not to provide facts on what happened, his goal is to show his readers- whether they are scholars or those who enjoy history- the drama that unfolded that year, with as many reliable sources as possible. Howarth describes the year by referencing the “Bayeux tapestry, the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, The Carmen, Hastingae Proelio, Gesta Guillielmi, the Domesday, De Gestis Regum Anglorum Vita Wulfstani, and Historia Ecclesiastica” (Howarth, sources page). Howarth wrote this with as little bias as he could as he mentioned in his introduction and revealed to us the driving questions that prodded him to write this story. Anglo- Saxon England, according to Howarth, espeically before the Normans, was very easy-going and “self-sufficient”. Most people had plenty to eat and drink and they had enough space to maintain a healthy lifesyle, involving hard work and rewards. England had been at peace for a while and a middle class was beginning to appear. Villages had fences for protection for their vast …show more content…
Howarth goes to explain how the villages attempted to resist William and his army and how the barbarians burned their crops, stole their animals, raped and pillaged as they pleased. The people became scared and grew to fear them. Howarth does make a comment about how he speculates that William would not have been able to stop this from happening, especially because of all the promises he made to his men. However, resistance in London was strong as Howarth points out in one of his last chapters. The people were very adamant about having an English ruler and would try to do anything to stop William from being

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    In 1215, The Magna Carta was brought up in a field in England known as Runnymede. The Magna Carta was a charter that was targeted against the deranged king of England at the time, King John. The Archbishop of Canterbury wrote up the charter to make peace between King John and barons who despised him. Dan Jones explains the history of King John and the Magna Carta in an article he had wrote for the Smithsonian. In his article, “The Mad King and Magna Carta,” the author Dan Jones begins with a short narrative of when he had visited Runnymede.…

    • 1327 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It seems that the Carolingian Empire was a safe and peaceful empire because they had a king who actually cared. Out of all the kings I read about in history, Charlemagne seem really great to me because he cared about his people, he was kind and smart, and was great at…

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The French Indian War, or the Seven Years’ War as it was known in Europe, was the be all end all for France and England. By winning this war, it would assure either country’s dominance, political power and possible bragging rights. At first, things looked pretty grim for the British. When attempting to rally up colonist and to learn more about the public’s opinion of the war at the Albany Congress, their feedback was less than anticipated. At best, the colonist’s opinion were lackluster, and only feigned absolute support.…

    • 1756 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    War caused these soldiers great fear and Thomas persuaded the colonists to fight because he showed how all nations were frightened by war. They didn’t continue their bravery, they became scared. His…

    • 1256 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He had many conflicts with the British law and proved himself to be a true revolutionist. One of his many contributions to the war was his engraving of the Boston Massacre. He created his own propaganda of the event. He made it seem like the colonists were not fighting back against the British, and that the colonists had done nothing to deserve an open fire response from the soldiers. This made the people hate the soldiers even more, since they thought that the soldiers had just begun to shoot the colonists for no reason.…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Settlers, pushed ever further into the borderlands between the colony and Indian territory came in to greater and greater conflict with their new neighbors and saw government attempts at conciliation and peace as unacceptable, they wanted retribution, they wanted someone to blame (Morgan, p. 258-60). The rebellion began with crusading zeal, killing Indians without regard for tribe or affiliation, supporters eventually defining enemy Indians as “any that left their towns without English permission” (Morgan, p. 263). The focus of the rebellion managed to stay on the Indians for much of its length, but eventually in the face of government resistance, the discontented began to finally see the colony 's establishment as their true enemy and began to run amok, plundering the estates and lands of the wealthy, servants and slaves promised freedom flocked to the rebellion 's banner eventually burning Jamestown and forcing the governor to…

    • 1433 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Libya, Gaddafi has caused a huge impact on the citizens. He had killed many and he was hated by the citizens and the citizens want him to leave. Many of his own ministers are also against him because they fear their safety and want to help save Libya. Critics state that “several ambassadors, and key ministers, including the justice minister and Gaddafi’s No.2 man, one of the army officers who joined Gaddafi have [side] with the protestors.” (“Libya’s Tyrant Must Depart”). In a similar manner, “Macbeth’s soldiers and his thanes also sided with the English army” (Shakespeare 5-2) to help take Macbeth down.…

    • 1119 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The colonist model of war shocked the Narragansett and Mohegan’s, they went into that battle believing they would capture and adopt the women and children. Instead the colonist go into the village blazing, believing their god wanted them to fight this war in a mode of “too furious and slays too many people,” (Taylor,…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The act of handling these animal products was offensive to the Muslin and Hindus faiths of the sepoys’ and they refused to do this, resulting in the imprisonment of many and then the military mutiny began. Large numbers of mutineers joined by many rebels from civil unrest, destroyed the prisons as they freed prisoners. This caused many problems for British Imperialism and resulted in much blood shed for both sides and therefore more distant relationships followed the mutiny (Anderson,…

    • 1707 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    I think the actions of Odysseus against the wooers' was justified. Odysseus acted against the wooers' only because of the injustice that was taken place in his home. The wooers' would not leave and treated the people of Ithaca horribly. They even plotted to kill his son to get him out of the way as next of kin. Odysseus fought for his honor and his family who he desperately tried to get back to.…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays