After he was additionally canonized by Pope Alexander III, Henry II accepted his part as the one responsible for the murder (even though his participation was indirect). Submitting to the punishment specified by the pope, he walked to Canterbury Cathedral clothed in sackcloth and ashes and allowed himself be whipped by the monks there. To recover his popular image, he built extra monasteries in France. For a time he even neglected the court authority problem. Since the author of The Golden Legend is aiming to convince us that Thomas Becket should be considered a saint of the Catholic Church, he pictures him in a good light and his opponents, including Henry II, in a dark light. In general however, The Golden Legend seems to depict an accurate view of King Henry that is supported by historical records. Both sources present him as a sinister personage, an unpopular ruler, and a hindrance to the Catholic
After he was additionally canonized by Pope Alexander III, Henry II accepted his part as the one responsible for the murder (even though his participation was indirect). Submitting to the punishment specified by the pope, he walked to Canterbury Cathedral clothed in sackcloth and ashes and allowed himself be whipped by the monks there. To recover his popular image, he built extra monasteries in France. For a time he even neglected the court authority problem. Since the author of The Golden Legend is aiming to convince us that Thomas Becket should be considered a saint of the Catholic Church, he pictures him in a good light and his opponents, including Henry II, in a dark light. In general however, The Golden Legend seems to depict an accurate view of King Henry that is supported by historical records. Both sources present him as a sinister personage, an unpopular ruler, and a hindrance to the Catholic