Pros And Cons Of Dropping The Atomic Bomb

Improved Essays
The decision to use nuclear weapons

The decision, made by the United States of America, to drop nuclear bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki may not have been the most popular or best choice for the planet; but however, it was the choice that needed to be made to end the war in the pacific. This decision was made so that both sides would suffer the lowest number of casualties possible. The United States had a conference with Japanese leaders to attempt to bring the war to an end peacefully, however the Japanese had made it very clear to the United States and president Truman that they had no intention of abandoning the code of honor they live by and would fight until the last man. After this conference the Decision to drop
…show more content…
The American government did not want to completely slaughter the Japanese people. They knew most of them were innocent, however the war in the Pacific needed to come to an end. America also knew that a land invasion would result in a massive loss of life for both sides, and surrender from the U.S. would be nothing but weakness in the eyes of Japan and the Soviet Union. On top of this there was a large amount of consideration about what this would do to Japan’s economy, ecosystem and future as a country. President Truman was also concerned about the way that the United States would be viewed by the rest of the world in the time following the use of a weapon that would destroy an entire city in an instant. He was worried about the United States being viewed as a nation of inhumane and savage people by nations that are not involved in that particular conflict. This would make trade with said other countries nearly impossible and could have created tensions between some of the other world superpowers of the …show more content…
Their mission was to reach the city of Hiroshima, activate and drop the bomb, escape the blast radius and return to base. In doing this they changed warfare forever. When “big boy” was dropped on hiroshima the city was destroyed as soon as the bomb detonated. The equivalent of 15,000 tons of TNT exploded and instantly killed over 80,000 people and vaporised almost everything in the city. In the weeks after the bombing, thousands of people would die from radiation poisoning due to the fact that atomic bombs emit massive amounts of radiation. In the days following the use of the first atomic bomb the United States pleaded with Japan to surrender and start rebuilding. However, the Japanese would not give up the fight even after such a massive loss. this showed Truman that he could not hold back any longer and decided to send in a second atomic bomb to destroy a second Japanese city. The second atomic bomb was to be dropped on the Japanese city of Nagasaki and like the first atom bomb, would kill tens of thousands of people. This ultimately would be what led to the surrender of Japan, but only if the country could keep their emperor as a leader. This was because of the fact that tradition is so deeply ingrained in Japanese

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    The United State’s decision to drop the atomic bomb on Japan during World War ll is one of the most arguable controversies in American history due to the questionable reasoning behind its use, and the horrific effects it had on Japanese citizens. At the time of the bombing it was actually supported by a vast majority of the American public. During 1945, the decision to use the bomb was not only supported but encouraged. In August of 1945 opinion polls given to the American public showed 85% of Americans supported bombing Japan (Hadley, 21). On the contrary, historians such as Gar Alperovitz have argued Truman used the bomb merely to gain political status and power over the Soviets.…

    • 1359 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When Harry S. Truman grounded the success of the Manhattan Project, he knew he would be the one making the decision to discharge this terrible weapon, the atomic bombs. After four years American soldiers and civilians were distressed, yet the powerful Japanese army that consisted of two million soldiers that were refusing to give up their fight. Truman still deciding whether he should drop the bomb was the hardest decision and would be purely be a military decision. Before the decision was made the United States petitioned an allied demand of an unconditional surrender to the leadership of Japan. The Japanese army responded steadfast, rejecting the appealing surrender.…

    • 1007 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After several years of fighting , it was no surprise that each nation was feeling the toll of the conflict, which is why the U.S. wanted to put an end to it. As stated by Taketo Suzuki in ‘Why Was the A-Bomb Dropped on Hiroshima’ “One reason for the atomic bombings given by the United States was to hasten the end of the war.” When dealing with foreign conflict it’s safe to say that a government’s priority should be protecting the lives of their citizens. Continuing to send troops would have resulted in more casualties on the American side, which is why their choice to drop Hiroshima and Nagasaki is deemed admissible, given that the Japanese had already claimed thousands of American souls during WWII, and preventing any more was in the United States best interest. All of the bloodshed from the atomic missiles could have been avoided if Japan had agreed to the allies terms of surrender.…

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    DBQ: Dropping the Atomic Bomb on Japan The decision President Truman had to make regarding dropping a fission bomb onto Japanese cities in order to end the war would have been too hard for most of us to handle. America was weary after 4 years of almost total war with Germany, Italy, and Japan and the war needed to end. At this point, Japan was alone and dragging its feet after many losses. From the history we know, the decision was justified as it ended a devastating war with no end in sight and it saved more lives than were lost.…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A few days later, the Japanese surrendered and World War Two ceased to continue. The one man accredited to the droppings of both bombs was United States President Harry Truman. He never regretted his decision to drop the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki even though he could have chosen alternatives for winning the Second World War. President Truman was not justified in his decision to drop the atomic bomb and could have chosen better methods such as waiting for the Soviet Union’s aid, continuing conventional war tactics and modifying the terms of surrender for the Japanese.…

    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    During WWII, President Franklin Delano Roosevelt approved the development of the atomic bomb, a project that became known as the Manhattan Project, out of fear that the Nazis would try to build and use a nuclear weapon. After FDR’s death, President Truman inherited the most powerful weapon in the history of mankind and was left with the choice of using it or not. Undoubtedly, his decision changed the world in so many ways, and is largely thought and taught that dropping the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was necessary to end the Pacific War. Conversely, there were a number of alternatives the United States could have considered to avoid exposing our world to nuclear weapons while still triumphing in a Japanese agreement to an unconditional…

    • 1859 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Japan’s economy was down and running out of resources, but by the U.S. dropping the bombs it ended the war and allowed Japan to rebuild its country. The atomic bomb did cause fatalities, but it saved more lives that if the war was to be…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The dropping of atomic bombs is Hiroshima and Nagasaki was one of the most catastrophic bombing is history. It resulted in hundreds of thousands of deaths and the destruction of more than half of the cities infrastructures. Nonetheless Harry S. Truman and his advisors saw it as the only way to lead Japan to an unconditional surrender. While this is simply the opinion of the United States Commander in Chief and his advisors, there is a lot of controversy as to if it was truly a necessity in forcing Japan to surrender and ending the war. In the “Yes” article, “The Biggest Decision: Why We Had To Drop The Atomic Bomb” by Robert James Maddox argues why dropping atomic bombs in Japan became a necessity when land invasions and the Russians’ mediation were not effective.…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What were the motives behind the United States decision to use atomic bombs against Japan and what arguments have been made against it? WWII was fought between the Allied powers composed of USA, Britain and the Soviet Union, and the Axis Powers, comprised of Germany, Italy and Japan, and was one of the deadliest conflicts in all of history. The vast amount of casualties on both sides totalled to 6,000,000 deaths – about 3% of the global population in the 1940s. The use of atomic bombs was to put an end to the war. Leading up to Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the Manhattan Project influenced the course of history.…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Truman Hasty Decision Dbq

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages

    From order of President Truman, the United States dropped two atomic bombs on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, thus ending World War Two. President Truman’s hasty decision is not one to be honorable. This choice by the president was made with ignorance, lack of empathy, and lack of critical thinking. The bombing is unjustified due to Japan’s inevitable surrender, the amount of civilian casualties, and alternative opportunities to the bombing.…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It had appeared that the Japanese were not going to surrender the way America wanted them to. Of course a big reason why the bomb was used is that if Japan would have been invaded, the death toll could have potentially reached half a million or more instead of the hundreds of thousands that were killed by the atomic bomb. It is said that if the war had continued the amount of American lives lost could have greatly diminished the amount that was killed by the bombs. It is hard to tell what could have really happened but it is certain that if the war had continued so would the loss of…

    • 1537 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    These alternatives unfortunately were too costly in American lives to be pursued. For the first motive as an alternative, November 1st, 1945, British and Commonwealth countries were prepared for invasion to break Japan’s will to win attitude. But before the attack could be made, Truman felt such an encounter would cost too many American lives and casualties. Instead, bombing and blockading the Japanese cities by American Air force and Navy, felt like a better choice to make for an invasion.…

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq Analysis

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The use of a second atomic bomb was because Japan did not surrender after the first. This is why the option to only demonstrate the atomic bomb to Japan would not have worked (Document E). A demonstration would not have brought Japan to the bitter end like the two bombs being dropped on their cities did. The other options presented to Truman included a mainland invasion as well as a blockade combined with traditional bombing.…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Decision to Drop the Bomb During the summer of 1945, things were looking pretty grim for Imperial Japan, as they were the last axis power left and had been under constant firebombing for the United States, President Truman chose to drop two atomic bombs, one on Hiroshima on August 6th and one on Nagasaki on August 9th. Since before either of the two bombs had been dropped, it has been debated whether or not it was the right decision. Truman stated that the bombs were dropped to save American lives, but many argue over the government’s other motives at the time. Many bring up valid points over why the bomb should not have been dropped and that the government public justification for dropping the bomb was based off of false information, but ultimately the motivation behind dropping the bomb, hidden by the government or not, outweighs the reasons for not dropping the bomb.…

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The debate over whether President Truman should have dropped the atomic bombs over Hiroshima and Nagasaki has occurred over decades. There are many people who the favor other options to dropping the bomb, because they feel as if the thousands of innocent Japanese citizens who lost their lives could have been spared. They believe dropping the bombs were not necessary to winning the war. However, this researcher has come to the conclusion that, though this incident was tragic, nuclear warfare was the best decision in the end.…

    • 1046 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays