1. As noted in table 1 of Hensen et al., the dependent variables are:
• fear of cyberstalking by intimate partners
• fear of cyberstalking by friends/acquaintances
• fear of cyberstalking by strangers
2. The age coefficient in regarding fear of cyberstalking by an intimate partner as noted on table 2 is –0.11. Furthermore, the value associated with age in the section of intimate partner is noted with a single * so we know that p is less than or equal to 0.05. The value associated with the age coefficient (-0.11) is less than the level of significance (0.05). As a result, the null hypothesis can be rejected concluding that the age coefficient is significantly statistically related for the fear of cyberstalking by intimate partner. …show more content…
(The age coefficient related to to fear of cyberstalking by a friend/acquaintance in table 2 is given the value –0.10 Much like the previous question, the value associated with age in regards to the category friend/acquaintance is set with an *. Because of this, it is given that p is less than or equal to 0.05. When relating the two values we see that the value reflected by the age coefficient (-0.10) is less than the level of significance (0.05) or p. As a result of this the null hypothesis should be rejected. As a result it is known that the age coefficient is statistically related for the fear of cyberstalking by a friend or acquaintance. Because the age coefficient for fear of cyberstalking by a friend/ acquaintance is - 0.10 a one-unit change in age would show a decrease of
• fear of cyberstalking by intimate partners
• fear of cyberstalking by friends/acquaintances
• fear of cyberstalking by strangers
2. The age coefficient in regarding fear of cyberstalking by an intimate partner as noted on table 2 is –0.11. Furthermore, the value associated with age in the section of intimate partner is noted with a single * so we know that p is less than or equal to 0.05. The value associated with the age coefficient (-0.11) is less than the level of significance (0.05). As a result, the null hypothesis can be rejected concluding that the age coefficient is significantly statistically related for the fear of cyberstalking by intimate partner. …show more content…
(The age coefficient related to to fear of cyberstalking by a friend/acquaintance in table 2 is given the value –0.10 Much like the previous question, the value associated with age in regards to the category friend/acquaintance is set with an *. Because of this, it is given that p is less than or equal to 0.05. When relating the two values we see that the value reflected by the age coefficient (-0.10) is less than the level of significance (0.05) or p. As a result of this the null hypothesis should be rejected. As a result it is known that the age coefficient is statistically related for the fear of cyberstalking by a friend or acquaintance. Because the age coefficient for fear of cyberstalking by a friend/ acquaintance is - 0.10 a one-unit change in age would show a decrease of